Uncensored NASA Moon Images!!

Originally posted by stikkinikki
Please for the love of ALL THAT IS HOLY please, oh please, I am on my knees...

Ok..Ok! I think the crew got yer point!!

What do you think about my idea that the hollow framework looking thingy below the spire matches up pretty well with the ramp between the framework and the spire? Does anyone know of any other images of this site?

Yes! It IS pretty intriguing! You're right when you say that Hoagland would go NUTZ for this stuff!

Also check out what IronDog posted which is very interesting too.

Originally posted by IronDogg
When I first seen this photo, I thought, "Drilling Rig!". The more I look at it, the more I think it is a rig site.

Check out the similarity between your pic and the second one (diagram) that IronDog posted above!

I think this is the most mysterious image. But then it may also be possible that the tower is a result of light and shadow! But darned if I know for sure!

Cheers!

reply to post by stikkinikki


Did someone say something?

Just kidding.

Sorry, stikkinikki, I'm not quite seeing what you want us to see. What do you mean by hollow framework? What is that supposed to be? I got the ramp part, but what about the cube in front of the ramp?

Originally posted by mikesingh

Originally posted by Willbert
I usually find Mike to be quite detailed.. and leaving this fact out seems a bit odd.

Hi Willbert! That's a goof up by me which is inexcusable!! I was so preoccupied with those images, that I forgot to include the refs for each image. Instead I just listed them out in Word and then forgot which ref belonged to which image!

Can there be a bigger mutt on planet Earth? No!

However, I have provided the image links to the specific images asked for, but they're all over this thread! Anyway, let me know which particular image you are interested in and I'll get to work.

Apologies once again!

Cheers!

Any word or ideal what crater that is by those "tracks" ?

No need to apologize.. I understand you're giddiness. ^^

reply to post by stikkinikki


Those "towers" do not look like vertical features, they look like features of the ground.

Also, the resolution is not that good to try to find what those things look like, and resizing the images doesn't help either.

I will try to find a photo to show what I mean.

Hello Mike S. Don ' t yet read all replies , but very interesting post , so far !

I'll check that site and come back to give my impressions .

How was that trip to France ?? Remember I invited you for some good meal here at home , but you hadn't time ... Hope all was all right !

Cheers

This is amazing pictures btw those tracks are very weird indeed possibly human who knows i dont think they are from the lunar rover like someone said earlier.

reply to post by mikesingh


Well, Im just hoping the google lunar X prize blows all of this wide wide wide open.

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by stikkinikki

 

Those "towers" do not look like vertical features, they look like features of the ground.

Also, the resolution is not that good to try to find what those things look like, and resizing the images doesn't help either.

I will try to find a photo to show what I mean.

I am interested in the one tower not all the cone shapes. Those look more natural. In fact it is what is below the one tower that I find most interesting.

MikeSing: Aye ai aiii! Yes it looks similar to what IronDog posted. Very much so. The spire/tower pic that I am so interested - that you first posted is in my top ten non-terrestrial annomalies. Anymore information we can get about that image will be great.

board: sometimes I get carried away - like that martian butt behind the rock photo. Turns out it was most likely a rock but due to the cameras compressed view of the landscape it looked like it was right behind the rock.

Pictures like the tower and the artificial structure below the cliffs on Mars really distract me from my day to day work and remind me of how much fun exploring can be.

Cheers everyone! Eyes on the prize!

reply to post by thrashee


This info was already posted. I guess you might have overlooked it.

ser.sese.asu.edu...

reply to post by RegionalChaos


It's been updated and modified and others have already given me the file name, but thanks.

Man I have to say its getting more and more amusing listening to the skeptics these days, Ive noticed some particularly aggresive "debunking" attempts on this thread, well it doesint take a genius to realise there IS something going on on the moon, and no were not "seeing what we want to see".
God that has to be the funniest on.

Or the old "I dont see anything of interest" line, when its clear as day.

Anyways enough of that, some great pics, particularly the tower looking one.
The evidence is really piling up now.

Oh and the fact that NASA is run by 3 orginisations that are twoing and froing with internal problems and agendas could possibly explain how some pics get out in the first place for the skeptics.

So mike were are the HD pics of the moon from Japan of these areas or any areas of weirdness.

reply to post by Outlawstar


What's clear as day to you may not be as clear as day to others. That's kind of the point: it's a matter of interpretation, which is exactly what this thread is for.

The one thing we do know is that none of these conjectures really proves anything, so our only honest answer is, while we can certainly exchange opinions, we just don't know.

reply to post by Majorwood


Although I am not mike, I will answer that the HD images from Kaguya are not HD photos, are HD video, and will only be available next year, if I remember it well.

And there's at least one thread about Kaguya and its images.

If these lines are tracks, and I myself do think they are indeed tracks, then the question should be what's in that crater...

Maybe nothing; whomever laid them down might just have been out and about looking for a prime spot to kick back and smoke a phatty.

I do not see the tracks actually heading into the crater, so that kinda threw out the idea that a base of some sort is down there...

It would be nice to know the slope on that area of the crater - we could then try and figure out if a vehicle could negotiate it...but they, whoever they are, might have technology that allows them to traverse all terrain.

It is interesting how the tracks fade in the other direction, but are quite prevalent the rest of the way...guess a ship could have picked them up, but then why the primitive transportation in the first place?

Good stuff either way.

Originally posted by thrashee
reply to post by Outlawstar

 

What's clear as day to you may not be as clear as day to others. That's kind of the point: it's a matter of interpretation, which is exactly what this thread is for.

The one thing we do know is that none of these conjectures really proves anything, so our only honest answer is, while we can certainly exchange opinions, we just don't know.

Believe me when I say I understand that one hundred percent, but the FACT of the matter is, the evidence is OVERWHELMINGLY in teh theorists favour in the case of structures on the moon(and mars for that matter)

Its fair enough if they cant see anything, thats fine, but my advice would be a nice pair of glasses and a slice of humble pie.

I think that crater (the one near the "tracks") may be Moltke, but I am not sure.

Whatever those marks may be, they are not a result of the digitising, that's for sure, and they do not look to follow the ground, they look too linear and constant to be tracks made by something moving over craters and rocks.

reply to post by Outlawstar


You can't really call the opinion that the evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of a certain theory fact when the evidence itself has not conclusively been shown to demonstrate either side.

Ooh, I like the drilling rig idea! Seems to match the shape fairly well.

What about a lunar solar tower?

Those parallel lines near the base could be the reflectors.

...nah.

Originally posted by thrashee
reply to post by Outlawstar

 

You can't really call the opinion that the evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of a certain theory fact when the evidence itself has not conclusively been shown to demonstrate either side.

Actually the evidence HAS been shown to be conclusive in the case of structures on the moon, you may not think so and Im sorry if Im coming across as arrogant, but I genuinly cant see how you can come to any other opinion IF youve seen the best of the best pictures.