Uncensored NASA Moon Images!!

Originally posted by stikkinikki

Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan

Its a DARN GOOD THING that we have the OTHER space program the REAL one that the NAVY is running...

Did I ever mention the OTHER tether that flew at the same time STS 75 did?

Not even a nibble in almost 2 full pages since this post?

amazing.

Maybe you should back up your suggestion with some facts. Some links to the Navy Space Program and another tether flying at the same time.

What he said...how about some more detail? Graphics are nice.

Originally posted by mikesingh
ArMaP, who's talking of or even looking at the joints,

I am.

I said that those lines found by Ziggystar60 looked like something happened to the individual strips and I was answering Zorgon's post about it.

And also look carefully at Ziggy's crop I've made in the above post of mine. Did you notice how it melds with the terrain? A joint would have been uniform and ABOVE the terrain, not mixed up in it, with shadows and all! Get my drift?

That is why I like to work with unaltered images, by altering the image you changed the visible line between framelets.

Originally posted by TruthTellist
reply to post by mikesingh

 

Clearly the pictures you have posted are all just "Wind-Swept Anomalies"

"Wind-Swept Anomalies" ?

Are you talking about wind on the Moon? Wind like the one we have here on Earth?

Originally posted by mikesingh

Originally posted by anti72
again, just shadows, rocks and dust.

Originally posted by 4N6310

Originally posted my mikesingh
OK, now what do you say about this image?

(putting his hand against the screen)"They're back."

Well, since my friend anti72 may have shut shop, I need to now mention that your putting your hand against the screen and screaming, "they're back" (Rocks and dust) on that image I posted above, is untenable! Do you know what you're looking at?

IT'S A SATELLITE IMAGE OF WASHINGTON DC!! But it's just rocks and dust for you. This color image has been converted to gray scale so it can be compared with those Moon images. So now do you see the light of day when you comment on these Moon images? And the ones posted in the OP are far clearer than this one!

Cheers!

[edit on 20-8-2008 by mikesingh]

oh, our Spec Ops-friend Mike is getting verbally abusive.
and tricky. he now presents us an altered color foto from Washington.and nobody recognizes.
surprise everyone..

BOOH.

@´anomalies´:
again, just rocks and shadows.
but tricky.

cheers




[edit on 20-8-2008 by anti72]

reply to post by thrashee

I'm hard pressed to understand your point of view here... You say;

I provided explanations around post 3 or 4. Maybe you were too lazy to scroll back enough. But you're missing the point: I don't claim these things are anything other than anomalies.

So you're admitting they are anomalies but when anyone puts a theory, no matter how bizarre, forward to explain them you either reply with a sarcastic remark or shoot them down in flames! Don't get me wrong, I'm with you. They are just anomalies. Big question marks which seem to turn up in various places on the moon, but I'm interested in hearing what other people think they are and what they represent. I'm not interested in hearing anymore of your cutting sarcastic answers thank you very much.

Originally posted by mikesingh

Originally posted by anti72
again, just shadows, rocks and dust.

Originally posted by 4N6310

Originally posted my mikesingh
OK, now what do you say about this image?

(putting his hand against the screen)"They're back."

Well, since my friend anti72 may have shut shop, I need to now mention that your putting your hand against the screen and screaming, "they're back" (Rocks and dust) on that image I posted above, is untenable! Do you know what you're looking at?

IT'S A SATELLITE IMAGE OF WASHINGTON DC!! But it's just rocks and dust for you. This color image has been converted to gray scale so it can be compared with those Moon images. So now do you see the light of day when you comment on these Moon images? And the ones posted in the OP are far clearer than this one!

Cheers!

[edit on 20-8-2008 by mikesingh]

Well, you just go with your bad self.
I still say it looks more like static on a television than anything else(in case, you didn't understand what my quote was referring to). LMAO @ you thinking I would "scream" such a thing.

Google earth has much better apparent resolution and detail than whatever sat the DC pic came from(or the moon pics, for that matter).

Sorr man, I'm just not seeing these structures that you are. I see shadow play, but that is not a claim that you are wrong as much as a statement that I need to see it in full color 1080p before I can really make an honest guess...and even then, knowing what can be done with digital images would leave me guessing.

Anyways, I have said all I had wanted to here, o have a nice day.

Originally posted by 4N6310
Just saying I am fascinated by the human ability to interpret the same picture in various ways that can radically change depending on the picture's orientation.

That better?

You bet!! Peace!

Originally posted by franspeakfree
Excellent thread thanks for sharing the photos with us, to all the septics out there you must be mad to try and disprove the fact that there are building/structures on the moon. Can't wait for Disclosure its going to be such an interesting time for us.

Oh dear. It seems us skeptics have to explain the basics of burden of proof every other thread.

Simply put, franspeakfree, it's not up to us to disprove anything; it's up to you (or any believer) to prove that this evidence is, in fact, demonstrating that buildings exist. Until then, we can all draw our own conclusions till the cows come home, and these images simply remain as interesting anomalies.

Originally posted by Malevolent_Aliens
If for some reason I was given the chance to put in a special request with the aliens you would be the first on my list for recommendation. You really could use a good probe job, I'm quite confident that would turn you into a believer.

And this is exactly why I don't believe a word of your contactee claims, Malevolent. I thought you were big on not wishing the horrific experiences you've undergone on anyone; now we see you making trite banter out of it in response to a skeptic.

reply to post by thrashee


yes. and some things cant be proven , so we all shall BELIEVE..

..and some believe they are after Osama ..

Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
reply to post by thrashee

 

I'm hard pressed to understand your point of view here... You say;

I provided explanations around post 3 or 4. Maybe you were too lazy to scroll back enough. But you're missing the point: I don't claim these things are anything other than anomalies.

So you're admitting they are anomalies but when anyone puts a theory, no matter how bizarre, forward to explain them you either reply with a sarcastic remark or shoot them down in flames! Don't get me wrong, I'm with you. They are just anomalies. Big question marks which seem to turn up in various places on the moon, but I'm interested in hearing what other people think they are and what they represent. I'm not interested in hearing anymore of your cutting sarcastic answers thank you very much.

Very well said and I second the motion. Thrashee is nothing more than a think he knows it all little flame child. Every subject, every idea, every picture somehow he has the answer for it, it's always the same answers for thrashee.

This is nothing,
It's a rock,
It's dust,
It's a bird,
It's a plane,
Your delusional,
Photoshopped,
CGI
Hoax.

Rarely have I ever seen thrashee actually contribute to a thread.
He truly does live up to his name, he thrashes every thread with his utter dribilish yabble yabble remarks.

Personally I would like to see what other posters have to say about these nice moon anomalies.







[edit on 20-8-2008 by Malevolent_Aliens]

I apologize if this has already been answered, but:

For yet another time, to the OP or to anyone else:

Can you please provide the image or file name of the "tracks" photo? The photos have been renamed as posted here, so we cannot independently verify which set this image belongs to on the ASU website.

reply to post by thrashee

And this is exactly why I don't believe a word of your contactee claims,

Let's be honest now thrashee, if I layed down my entire life and portfolio on the table, showed you pictures, documents, medical reports with multiple witnesses you still wouldn't believe a word of it, so don't give me I don't believe you because of your post commentary BS.



[edit on 20-8-2008 by Malevolent_Aliens]

Originally posted by Malevolent_Aliens
reply to post by thrashee

 

And this is exactly why I don't believe a word of your contactee claims,

Let's be honest now thrashee, if I layed down my entire life and portfolio on the table, showed you pictures, documents, medical reports with multiple witnesses you still wouldn't believe a word of it, so don't give me that I don't believe you because of your post commentary BS.

Nice cop out. Too bad you can't provide one of those things.

You call it BS if you'd like--I'm merely pointing out that I find it a bit disingenuous that one who claims to have been through hell and back via abductions would jest about anal probes to a skeptic she didn't care for. That's kind of like a Jew jesting that the guy who cut him off in traffic should be sent to a camp.

Think about it.

I have not read all 17 pages... But if I were to fathom a guess I would say those spires are the remnants of Sky Scrapers after a very large explosion. Possibly nuclear.

I sure do wish they would point the hubble at the moon.

reply to post by thrashee

Too bad you can't provide one of those things.

Many on this website know me and have seen those documents, pictures and medical reports via our websites.

I'm merely pointing out that I find it a bit disingenuous that one who claims to have been through hell and back via abductions.

Where have I ever claimed I went through hell and back? You have my experiences all wrong kiddo, have you been day dreaming again? Obviously you know nothing about my experiences so why even bring it up. Oh wait you know everything I forgot. Funny.

[edit on 20-8-2008 by Malevolent_Aliens]

Originally posted by thrashee

Originally posted by Malevolent_Aliens
reply to post by thrashee

 

And this is exactly why I don't believe a word of your contactee claims,

Let's be honest now thrashee, if I layed down my entire life and portfolio on the table, showed you pictures, documents, medical reports with multiple witnesses you still wouldn't believe a word of it, so don't give me that I don't believe you because of your post commentary BS.

Nice cop out. Too bad you can't provide one of those things.

You call it BS if you'd like--I'm merely pointing out that I find it a bit disingenuous that one who claims to have been through hell and back via abductions would jest about anal probes to a skeptic she didn't care for. That's kind of like a Jew jesting that the guy who cut him off in traffic should be sent to a camp.

Think about it.

I did. It's to bad you didn't and expect others to do it for you.

When one has been witnessed to something that others would consider dramatic or traumatized then the bar of that individual raises a lot higher as to what may be sensitive to others.

Whether its a way to cope or a way to view life differently is dependent on what each person wishes too believe.

Just because you say it should be handled one way does not make it so until you yourself had been privy to the exact same situation. And imagining it is not the same as living it.

You can throw all the semantics around you want. The only thing you can rely on is figures and average's from studies of similar situations.

Until I see those figures.. I'm leaning on you just spewing your point of view which is not backed by anything other then what you've been privy too.

So because you're not in the know.. what do you have to contribute?

[edit on 20-8-2008 by Willbert]

[edit on 20-8-2008 by Willbert]

Originally posted by mikesingh

IT'S A SATELLITE IMAGE OF WASHINGTON DC!! But it's just rocks and dust for you. This color image has been converted to gray scale so it can be compared with those Moon images. So now do you see the light of day when you comment on these Moon images? And the ones posted in the OP are far clearer than this one!

Cheers!



hehe I like this example I always wanted to do an experiment to see how people would react on images such as these.

btw: tnxx for bringing up these moon images.

reply to post by thrashee


Why must you derail any thread that has anything to do with space or UFOs?

Does this sort of behaviour have it's rewards? I can't imagine what they are.

Any how, Your actions and behaviour have gained you a place on my ignore list. And I must say that upon further review of this thread, with your presence omitted truly brings to light the excellent quality of the contributions.

It is just so much more concise without the presence of certain nasty noisy negativists. I recommend other members try this, if only for a time.

It really neatens up the thread.

Edit: Thrashee, I have taken the time to point out your actions and behaviour to the moderators. I recommend other members do likewise, otherwise he will not leave the thread.

[edit on 20-8-2008 by TruthTellist]

reply to post by thrashee


Can't say I know, or want to know, much about alien abduction or Malevolents claims. Thats their business! What interests me is this uncontrollable desire you have to prove that everyone else on here is inferior to you. Everytime I see your name its followed by a stinging comment or personal attack. Please tell me why?
Can't you just simply take a step back and enjoy the banter? Are you so ego driven that you have to make snide remarks to every single person you don't agree with?
Come on, lets get back to discussing what those structures on the moon may be and stop trying to intimidate other posters.