Uncensored NASA Moon Images!!

Exellent thread Mike, as per usual

Some VERY interesting images there, although i'm gonna have to deny ignorence on the "Spires" image.

They are DEFINATELY shadows, with the light source high in the sky and the shadows being cast DOWN an incline, hence making them appear looooooooonger the objects casting them.

THE SPIRES




And here is the SAME image, just flipped 180 degrees (no 'enhancements')

Little ol' boulders, sitting on a hill....




Just sifting the wheat from the chaff 'n all that

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

But on another note, still some great images there

Zorgon

Hows things

Do you know for sure ( whatever THAT means these days ) if there was a rover of sorts up there at the time these images were taken?

In other words, is there a rational explanation for these tracks?



And why would these tracks appear to magically stop in direct relation to the bottom half of the ajoining line?



Cheers in advance for any enlightenment you have to offer

Cheers
AoN

Starred and Flagged for sure

[edit on 20-8-2008 by Anomic of Nihilism]

whoops,


[edit on 20-8-2008 by Anomic of Nihilism]

[edit on 20-8-2008 by Anomic of Nihilism]

reply to post by mikesingh


Oops, just above my post.

But I still think you should have put the image numbers on the opening post, it would be easier for all, everybody reads the opening post (I think).

Originally posted by zorgon
Well ArMaP since you chastised Mike for missing the image numbers on the track (bad Mikey

) I in turn get to 'straighten you out'

Those are NOT "Two adjoining strips" and you know it...

They were not created onboard as separate strips but they were created as separate strips on Earth.

The light passing through the film, modulated by image density, was sensed by a photomultiplier tube through the associated light-collector optics. An electrical signal proportional to the intensity of the transmitted light was generated, amplified, and transmitted to the ground receiving station. The received video signal was sent to the ground reconstruction electronics (GRE) where it was converted to a line scan on a kinescope tube. The variations in light intensity on this kinescope tube corresponded to the variations in image density on the spacecraft film.

The line on the kinescope tube was recorded on moving 35-mm Kodak television recording film, type SO-349. The image on the 35-mm film was 7.2 times the size of the image on the spacecraft film. After processing, this positive image film was run through a film cutter to remove excess film and the individual framelets were separated. The framelets were then laid side by side on stable-base polyester film to reconstruct the original photograph. Master negatives were made from the positives.

Source

As you can see on the bold text, the images we see were made from individual framelets, probably because of the overlap created by the scanning process on board the orbiter.

That is why we can see some not so good joins (like the case of that image that Ziggystar posted) on some images, with some missing areas, more noticeable on the craters



and in some places we can see the shadow of one framelet over the other.

Here's some more...






Ziggy's find, cropped.

Can anyone identify a particular area or picture in this collection that NASA has covered up publicly? For example we have all seen many NASA moon pictures that have large areas with rectangular block obviously blocking something out or other areas that have been air brushed!

Has anyone located one of these areas in these photos?

reply to post by mikesingh


again, just shadows, rocks and dust.

I want to believe.

cheers

Originally posted by ArMaP
That is why we can see some not so good joins (like the case of that image that Ziggystar posted) on some images, with some missing areas, more noticeable on the craters



and in some places we can see the shadow of one framelet over the other.

ArMaP, who's talking of or even looking at the joints, which is pretty shoddy work by whoever. We're talking about what's above and below the joints! Can you explain (Not in Portugese, pllleeasse!! ) how on Earth, errr...I mean Moon could they have formed by joining the sections?

And also look carefully at Ziggy's crop I've made in the above post of mine. Did you notice how it melds with the terrain? A joint would have been uniform and ABOVE the terrain, not mixed up in it, with shadows and all! Get my drift?

Cheers!

[edit on 20-8-2008 by mikesingh]

I would like to second the request that any crops from any photos be at least identified by name.
Interesting finds on some of these and can't wait till the moon man is found.

b

reply to post by mikesingh


Clearly the pictures you have posted are all just "Wind-Swept Anomalies"

If not, then we are seeing results of geological activity nothing more.

It is not uncommon for glass shards to grow to hundreds of feet in height - one need only look here on earth.

Most of the shadows are simply dust devils whirling around on the lunar surface - there is really no need for such hyperbole

What we are seeing is simply the result of a temperature inversion. nothing more. It is just a weather balloon.

Edit: ToSay: You're Magic.

[edit on 20-8-2008 by TruthTellist]

Hi, I'm a new member here.
Posting anonymously doesn't always seem to work(never has for me).

I find myself wondering why NASA would censor photos after going to such lengths to get them in the first place(presuming the "moon hoax" is false, of course). I find myself wondering if the smudged and airbrushed photos were done at NASA or by those suggesting they have done so.
Isn't one of NASA's missions to seek out new life and new civilizations....to boldly go...oh, wait.

Seems illogical to me that a supposed space agency would damage their own efforts.

Then again, I have read/heard some stories of the types of corruption that are simply meant to keep a program running where it would be in danger of being shut down due to it's own success, hence, the sandbagging effect.
Weather the account I am thinking of happened or not, I don't know, but I do know that people are capable of such things and for petty reasons.

None of these photos has proven anything to me, but the trick with rotating the pic 180 degrees to turn shadows into dark spires was rather telling.

If you haven't already seen this TED video, I'd recommend checkin it out:
Believing strange things

I, too, want to believe, but it can certainly be a challenge.
Maybe I should go up to Mt Anderson or wherever that place is.

Originally posted by anti72
reply to post by mikesingh

 

again, just shadows, rocks and dust.

I want to believe.

cheers

OK, now what do you say about this image?

Originally posted by mikesingh

Originally posted by anti72
reply to post by mikesingh

 

again, just shadows, rocks and dust.

I want to believe.

cheers

OK, now what do you say about this image?

(putting his hand against the screen)"They're back."

Originally posted by 4N6310

None of these photos has proven anything to me, but the trick with rotating the pic 180 degrees to turn shadows into dark spires was rather telling.

Hi 4N6301, what 'trick' are you implying? What was so 'telling'? You mean the pic was turned 180 deg before posting it here? Sorry, but I don't indulge in such gimmickry!

Have a look at the original image here. Do you think it has been rotated 180 deg? It is exactly as shown in the original. So your contention that it was rotated to produce those spires is pretty clumsy, to say the least.


lo5-125-h2a

Cheers!

Originally posted by hande
Japan JAXA orbiter took moon videos. In You-tube one man find some strange things:

www.youtube.com...

Strange spider-type construction was found. Same type system you can find from unsensored old pictures.

I have circled two interesting features in yellow that appear near "spider legs" aka "triangle-E" MAYBE. Similar appearing hollow framework appears under the "spider legs" as appears at the bottom of the "ramp" associated with the "triangle-E". Are they possibly collapsed towers of some sort? I envision water towers that have collapsedfrom old age or high winds.

[edit on 8/20/08 by stikkinikki]

reply to post by mikesingh


what do you think this is ?
what is the original source?
do you trust Nasa?

Originally posted by mikesingh

Originally posted by 4N6310

None of these photos has proven anything to me, but the trick with rotating the pic 180 degrees to turn shadows into dark spires was rather telling.

Hi 4N6301, what 'trick' are you implying? What was so 'telling'? You mean the pic was turned 180 deg before posting it here? Sorry, but I don't indulge in such gimmickry!

Have a look at the original image here. Do you think it has been rotated 180 deg? It is exactly as shown in the original. So your contention that it was rotated to produce those spires is pretty clumsy, to say the least.

lo5-125-h2a

Cheers!

Oh, sorry, I guess I phrased that wrong.
What I meant was more along the lines of this:
"None of these photos has proven anything to me, but the trick with rotating the pic 180 degrees to turn dark spires into boulder shadows was rather telling."

Just saying I am fascinated by the human ability to interpret the same picture in various ways that can radically change depending on the picture's orientation.

That better?

[edit on 20-8-2008 by 4N6310]

Its a DARN GOOD THING that we have the OTHER space program the REAL one that the NAVY is running...

Did I ever mention the OTHER tether that flew at the same time STS 75 did?

Not even a nibble in almost 2 full pages since this post?

amazing.

Hello all ,

i find it very refreshing to see so many young people insulting each other over something so obvious ...
Its clear that NASA is censoring images since the beginning of the 70´s

most of you where still a twinkle in daddies eyes when this all started so your involved replies and angry outbursts are really very funny indeed ..


Nice pics by the OP and really I have not seen the tower befoer ...
but what I seen in my lifetime is more then sufficient to tell me there is something ODD on the moon or indeed the annormalitie is the moon itself ...but tats another story ..

I have attached just one picture for you skeptics (what a silly word for kids with absoltue no life experiences to back this up and rather unwitting outbursts of emotions )
Nevertheless you (wannabe) debunkers please have a look at the attached image..
This is the original so if you like just browse to NASA and look at it there .,.
I have not chnaged it as I KNOW it s best if people see it for themselfs and not get pointed at it severy time ..
Please someone explain this odd green shape sitting in the middle of the pic ..
download it enlarge and brighten ever so slightly the middle of the pic ..
WHAT IS IT !! surely NOONE can say its artifacts or indeed a camera annormality ..
This pic is VERY high qulaity and was shot 2 mtrs away form the rock ..
You have a look ...you decide ...


to download go here :

www....(nolink)/imageview.php?quickkey=ejxmq32dmmm&thumb=5

Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan

Its a DARN GOOD THING that we have the OTHER space program the REAL one that the NAVY is running...

Did I ever mention the OTHER tether that flew at the same time STS 75 did?

Not even a nibble in almost 2 full pages since this post?

amazing.

Maybe you should back up your suggestion with some facts. Some links to the Navy Space Program and another tether flying at the same time.

Originally posted by anti72
again, just shadows, rocks and dust.

Originally posted by 4N6310

Originally posted my mikesingh
OK, now what do you say about this image?

(putting his hand against the screen)"They're back."

Well, since my friend anti72 may have shut shop, I need to now mention that your putting your hand against the screen and screaming, "they're back" (Rocks and dust) on that image I posted above, is untenable! Do you know what you're looking at?

IT'S A SATELLITE IMAGE OF WASHINGTON DC!! But it's just rocks and dust for you. This color image has been converted to gray scale so it can be compared with those Moon images. So now do you see the light of day when you comment on these Moon images? And the ones posted in the OP are far clearer than this one!

Cheers!


[edit on 20-8-2008 by mikesingh]