It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Absence of Self
Can you tell me if the reputed figures were accurate since it does appear to be somewhat disputed and I honestly cannot tell?
Originally posted by Absence of Self
Don't suppose you would happen to now if the Georgian regulars have access to western AA hardware
Originally posted by Absence of Self
rumors that Georgia has been western armed
Originally posted by Absence of Self
but there appears to be no evidence of this (apart from one or two G36's which anyone could buy) and the only thing not actually televised is the Anti air?
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Maloy, a quick question, since your Russian...
Could you have a look through this article and see what it says in regards to the Russian Air Force loosing a Tu-22 in Ossetia?
www.lenta.ru...
If it's not too much trouble
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
The two planes Russia lost in the opening stages of this conflict were most likely Frogfoots (Su-25), low altitude ground support aircraft (which are not supersonic), or older Yakolev's/MiG's like the MiG-23, probably on forward observation.
(The aircraft haven't been positively identified by either side so far).
MOSCOW (AFP)--Russia's defense ministry confirmed on Saturday the loss of two of its planes in fighting over Georgia, the first time Moscow has confirmed Georgian claims to have downed Russian military planes.
"Up to today, the Russian side has lost two planes," defense ministry spokesman Anatoly Nogovitsyn said at a televised briefing, without giving details.
Earlier Russian news agency reports, citing Russian peacekeepers, said the downed planes were a Tu-22 bomber and an Su-25 fighter jet.
Source
Originally posted by Fulcrum29
LOL what an ignorant post.
The Mujahadeen/afghan force that the soviets faced in their Afghan war in the 80's was 300,000+ men strong. Soviets lost only 14,000 men and killed over 1,000,000 Afghans.
When U.S. faced a similarly sized force in Vietnam the U.S. lost 60,000 men
yet Soviet only lost 14,000 in Afghanistan.
I guess using your logic and comparisons that means the Soviet Union was far more powerful militarily than the USA.
Originally posted by Absence of Self
reply to post by purplemonkey
I don't honestly know but i suspect its doubtful really.
From what I've seen from the current footage Georgia is mostly armed with Soviet hardware dating form the 70's. (T-72's, T-62's BM-13 Katyusha etc.) A few individual troops look to be carrying G-36's etc but nothing miraculous.