The North Side Flyover - Officially Documented, Independently Confirmed

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by tide88
Do you not read whole sentences.

Do you mean this sentence?

"Ultima took my test and scored a 121 which I am quite disappointed in."

Sorry your stuidity is rubbing off on me. I mean paragraphs. Or all the sentences in the paragraph. What evidence do you have that there is a media conspiracy. What solid evidence. You like talking about evidence so much. Do you have an internal memo from one of the news agencies or are you just speculating.

[edit on 24-8-2008 by tide88]

Originally posted by tide88
Ok. So you dont work directly for the NSA. Is that what you are saying. But actually work in some other aspect. .

NO i am stating that i do work for NSA. Also to take any courses through NCS you have to work for NSA or it partners.



[edit on 24-8-2008 by ULTIMA1]

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by tide88
Ok. So you dont work directly for the NSA. Is that what you are saying. But actually work in some other aspect. .

NO i am stating that i do work for NSA. Also to take any courses through NCS you have to work for NSA or it partners.



[edit on 24-8-2008 by ULTIMA1]

Yes but by showing you took courses at the NCS doesnt prove you work for them. You could work for dozens of other companies, that is even if you are the person on those transcripts. Although after thinking about it, you may work there, however you are probably just working the security gate. It would def. fit the hours you works. Security detail and also you backround as a federal police officer. Isnt that what roberts is. A FPO at the pentagon. You are probably the same thing at the NSA. Love to hear if you talk the same way he does... UH UM UHHH UMMMM I THINK NO IT WAS....

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by fleabit
1. If everyone did not see the same thing, it never happened!

and...

2. Unless someone snapped a photo of the actual flight # and other identifying information on the 757 in the few moments it flew by witnesses that saw it, then it wasn't that flight.

Gee you guys just cannot help but show how immature you are and how little you really know.

1. The witnesses at the Pentagon could not agree on what they saw. This does not make good evidence, and would not hold up in court.

2. If photos have no proper sources they are not good evindece, and would not hold up in court.

[edit on 24-8-2008 by ULTIMA1]

Do you know what the word immaturity means? You may want to look it up, I don't think you know what it really means.

Are you being purposely dense about this, or do you really believe what you write? Did you even bother reading my example, and why your line of thinking is ludicrous? So in your mind:

10 people see something out of the corner of their eye. They give differing and not very clear accounts. Another 10 saw something from a further distance, or from an odd angle, and give slightly more solid accounts, but still some dicrepancies. Finally, 10 people were close by, and clearly saw what happened, and their accounts all mesh.

From what you are saying, all 30 accounts are null and void, because they don't agree with each other. Is this correct?

If you really think the eyewitness accounts wouldn't stand in a court of law, you really don't know much about law.

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by tide88
Read the whole thing in context. If you cannot come to the conclusion I was talking about me you are more helpless then I originally thought.

These are your exact words.

"Ultima took my test and scored a 121 which I am quite disappointed in."




[edit on 24-8-2008 by ULTIMA1]

i just want to jump in here to point out how silly any argument with ultima is at this point. read the above. Ultima posted this twice, stating it was the "exact words."

actually, if you read the original post in question, it says this

Ultima, took my test and scored a 121 which

see that comma in there? that means the sentence is addressing ultima, not referring to him. whether you understand or notice that or not does not matter. what matters is that ultima has twice now posted "exact words" that he edited the comma out of.

Originally posted by re22666
see that comma in there? that means the sentence is addressing ultima, not referring to him.

How about this sentence that does not have the comma?

"You should know this seeing you work for the NSA. Ultima took my test and scored a 121 which I am quite disappointed in."

reply to post by ULTIMA1


Okay I think I know what Ultima Does. He is NSA Police. It would explain his hours and the qualifications he must have. One of the main requirements is

The 10 week Mixed Basic Police Training Course at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) in Glynco, Georgia.*
* FLETC provides a rigorous, physically and academically challenging battery of courses/instruction in law enforcement skills/techniques, which includes classroom instruction with written examinations, graded practical exercises, firearms instruction, and a PEB.**
** FLETC training may be waived for candidates who possess current Maryland Police Training Commission certification, or the equivalent.

Ultima1 transcript So in other word he probably has some kind of clearance however I doubt he really sees any classified documents. THe ultima1 saga is solved. Now we can all move on.

[edit on 24-8-2008 by tide88]

Originally posted by fleabit
If you really think the eyewitness accounts wouldn't stand in a court of law, you really don't know much about law.

Having been a police officer i know that witness stements usually do not make good evidence unless there is other evidence to support them.

In this case you have a lot of different accounts and even at least 1 admitting they did not see what hit the Pentagon, they were told later it was a 757.



[edit on 24-8-2008 by ULTIMA1]

Originally posted by tide88
Okay I think I know what Ultima Does. He is NSA Police.

You are half right. And its was not a transcript you posted but a certificate from FLETC.

As stated a lot of times before i used to be a NSA police officer, but now i am an analyst.

Also as stated many times i have a Top Secret Clearence.


[edit on 24-8-2008 by ULTIMA1]

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by re22666
see that comma in there? that means the sentence is addressing ultima, not referring to him.

How about this sentence that does not have the comma?

"You should know this seeing you work for the NSA. Ultima took my test and scored a 121 which I am quite disappointed in."

lolololololol. you can repost your edited version all you want. the origninal sentence, the first time it was posted, from which you originally replied with your edited version, still has a comma in it no matter how many times you post it without.

reply to post by re22666


Yes, I orginally forgot the comma. However, if you take the context of the whole paragraph it is clear I am talking about me. But that will not sway ultima. Which is funny coming from him. Who probably has the worst spelling or grammer I have seen on any internet forum I have ever visited. Need to give him a break though. All you need is a GED and two years of HS education to be qualified to apply to be a NSA police officer.

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by tide88
Okay I think I know what Ultima Does. He is NSA Police.

You are half right. And its was not a transcript you posted but a certificate from FLETC.

As stated a lot of times before i used to be a NSA police officer, but now i am an analyst.

Also as stated many times i have a Top Secret Clearence.


[edit on 24-8-2008 by ULTIMA1]

No way you are an analyst when you cannot analyze a simple statement. However I fully believe you may be a NSA Police Officer. Also you def. do not fit this requirment:

Unquestionable loyalty to the US and sound moral character as established by a comprehensive Federal Special Background Investigation (to include a polygraph).

[edit on 24-8-2008 by tide88]

Originally posted by re22666
lolololololol. you can repost your edited version all you want.

Its not an edited version, you can go back and look for yourslef. Thanks for showing again that you do not read or understand posts.

Originally posted by tide88
No way you are an analyst when you cannot analyze a simple statement.

So you are also calling the people that have checked out my documents liars ?

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by re22666
lolololololol. you can repost your edited version all you want.

Its not an edited version, you can go back and look for yourslef. Thanks for showing again that you do not read or understand posts.

ok well i copied mine exactly from the first post. sorry pal but you make a pretty poor cop if you either cannot see evidence or have no problem lying about altering it. we have proven you have no credibility. you are not helping your case or anyone else's but maybe throatyogurt. maybe you are just here to make the debunkers look good.

page 65
4th post down

Really

NCS courses are provided to the civilian and military population of NSA/CSS, as well as our partners throughout the Intelligence Community, the military services, and the USCS.

seems to me that alot of people would be qualified to take those courses. You should know this seeing you work for the NSA. Ultima, took my test and scored a 121 which I am quite disappointed in. I have scored higher on previous tests I have taken. Your turn. iq test Think the reason I scored so low was because I am also playing in a poker tour. at the same time. HOwever I am sure it will still be way higher than yours. Doubt you will even break 100. Remeber no pen or paper, no cheating.

[edit on 24-8-2008 by tide88]

[edit on 24-8-2008 by tide88]

oh and now that is three times that you claimed you were showing someone's exact words that we can all go back and see you have changed. you are a liar. you are trying to misrepresent another poster. i am not sure how this is going to help you at all by trying to further deny it. the original post will not go away no matter how hard you wish.

[edit on 8/24/2008 by re22666]

Originally posted by re22666
we have proven you have no credibility. .

You are a good one to talk about credability, i mean come on you still believe the official story with no evidnece to support it.

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by re22666
we have proven you have no credibility. .

You are a good one to talk about credability, i mean come on you still believe the official story with no evidnece to support it.

oh you are a riot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i never believed the official story, not from day one. i just also know that i do not believe you either.

reply to post by ULTIMA1


Ultima,take that IQ test yet. When you do make sure you fill in your name as ultima1. That way you can prove your score.

Originally posted by re22666
oh you are a riot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i never believed the official story, not from day one. i just also know that i do not believe you either.

Well you either believe the official story or are with me in wanting to find the truth, which is it?