The North Side Flyover - Officially Documented, Independently Confirmed

Originally posted by tide88
Ultima,take that IQ test yet. When you do make sure you fill in your name as ultima1. That way you can prove your score.

I did not see you post your score.

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by tide88
Ultima,take that IQ test yet. When you do make sure you fill in your name as ultima1. That way you can prove your score.

I did not see you post your score.

Please tell me you are kidding. What have we been talking about for the past two pages. 121.

Originally posted by tide88
Please tell me you are kidding. What have we been talking about for the past two pages. 121.

Post the test with your name and score on it.

reply to post by ULTIMA1


IQ TEST Unfortunatly my computation score was a little low because i was also playing a poker tournament online at the same time. Computation is the time it takes to complete. I think you have a total of 10 or 15 min, cant remember which. You will need to pay 9.95 to get the certificate, but seeing how you claim to make much more than I do, it shouldnt be a problem.

[edit on 24-8-2008 by tide88]

Well this thread is degenerating into something ridiculous. I'll visit again, when someone less biased and more intelligent than Ultima comes along to address some of the more pressing questions that refute this theory. No one has explained away the witnesses that had seen the plane crash into the building, and until they do, this entire premise is flawed. If anyone can actually explain this, I'm all ears.

reply to post by fleabit


Sorry I have stooped to his level. I am just too annoyed with his arguments and need to know how someone can be so delusional. I thought that maybe if he had a low IQ, this might explain his rediculous arguments.

reply to post by fleabit


double post

[edit on 24-8-2008 by tide88]

Originally posted by tide88
reply to post by fleabit

 

Sorry I have stooped to his level. I am just too annoyed with his arguments and need to know how someone can be so delusional. I thought that maybe if he had a low IQ, this might explain his rediculous arguments.

whatever you do, do not point out that he lied. apparently he has somethng over the mods because you cannot go around calling him a liar, even if you have solid proof of it around here.

Originally posted by fleabit
I'll visit again, when someone less biased and more intelligent than Ultima comes along to address some of the more pressing questions that refute this theory. .

How is someone trying to find the truth biased? You beleivers are really funny and sad, i mean you keep asking for evidence from others but can never post any when asked.

I have proven how intelligent i am from being a crew chief in the Air Force, to being a Federal Police officer, to being an analyst, all with a security clearence.

Originally posted by re22666
whatever you do, do not point out that he lied. apparently he has somethng over the mods because you cannot go around calling him a liar, even if you have solid proof of it around here.

Maybe the mods see through the attempts to state i am liar when i can prove i am not.

reply to post by ULTIMA1

So what did you score on your test? You need a highschool education to be in the airforce, and a GED to be a federal Police Officer. Don't believe your are an analyst. So you have not by any means proven you are intelligent. You have actually proved quite the opposite, with you constant grammer and spelling mistakes. Also telling people they are immature, grow up, debate like an adult, also shows your lack of intelligence.


[edit on 24-8-2008 by tide88]

Originally posted by fleabit
Well this thread is degenerating into something ridiculous. I'll visit again, when someone less biased and more intelligent than Ultima comes along to address some of the more pressing questions that refute this theory.

flea,

I know its discouraging. There are some good posters on this forum though, and can present some interesting questions. Its probably best that you clicn on the option to ignore his posts. Or do like others do and just tolerate his rants. Kind of like a child tugging on your pant legging asking for a quarter over and over and over and over....you know?

No one has explained away the witnesses that had seen the plane crash into the building, and until they do, this entire premise is flawed. If anyone can actually explain this, I'm all ears.

That is my main beef. Witnesses see the plane impact the building, but there are those that dismiss them because the instantly didnt know what flight number it was. Regardless that they saw it, their testimony means nothing...how can we believe them if they didnt know what flight numbver it was?

Its all quite silly.

Originally posted by gavron That is my main beef. Witnesses see the plane impact the building, but there are those that dismiss them because the instantly didnt know what flight number it was.

No it is dimissed becasue witnesses statments do not make good evdience and also there is no evidence to support what plane hit the Pentagon.

Remember it has not been released yet, as we both agreed.

Originally posted by tide88 Don't believe your are an analyst. ]

So you do not believe the intell courses i have documented with transcripts from NCS?

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by tide88 Don't believe your are an analyst. ]

So you do not believe the intell courses i have documented with transcripts from NCS?

What was your IQ score. I know you took the test. You logged off for about 15-20 minutes to take it.

TOPIC PEOPLE

Originally posted by tide88
What was your IQ score. I know you took the test. You logged off for about 15-20 minutes to take it.

I was going to take it but then my kids starting bugging me so i had to give it up till i can get some time to sit and take it.

This thread reminds me of how hopeless our task of finding out really is.
The OP, with all his dedication and hard work is trying to pinpoint flight paths that he believes wll provide evidence of false disclosure by TPTB.
This flight path evidence he seeks is all over the place, and this indicates that the conspiracy is GLOBAL.

Right now ( late Aug 2008 ) everybody is worried that the cold war is starting up again.
Vlad Putin is the enemy.
Former KGB.

He has technology viewing this area 24/7.
Probably communications data, as well as film.

Do you see him on TV with a pointer saying, ' and here's where this aircraft took off... it's flight plan... it's impact ' ?
'And, here's what communications were ( telemetry ? ) involved...'
No, of course not.

He ( Putin ) and others could do this very thing, but he doesn't.

That's because TPTB are global- they're all in on it !

S&F to OP. Thank you- but, dammit, we will never know... I'm sorry.

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

No it is dimissed becasue witnesses statments do not make good evdience and also there is no evidence to support what plane hit the Pentagon.

You are aware of the fact that the OP's "theory" is based solely on eyewitness statements, correct? And a rather small percentage of the eyewitnesses on the scene as well.

Do you disagree with the OP, that based only on their witnesses the plane was flying North of the Citgo?

Originally posted by Soloist
Do you disagree with the OP, that based only on their witnesses the plane was flying North of the Citgo?

As far as witnesses though you do have the police officers who are good witnesses.