It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Pentagon devising scenarios for martial law in US
By Patrick Martin
9 August 2005
Use this version to print | Send this link by email | Email the author
According to a report published Monday by the Washington Post, the Pentagon has developed its first ever war plans for operations within the continental United States, in which terrorist attacks would be used as the justification for imposing martial law on cities, regions or the entire country.
The front-page article cites sources working at the headquarters of the military’s Northern Command (Northcom), located in Colorado Springs, Colorado. The plans themselves are classified, but “officers who drafted the plans” gave details to Post reporter Bradley Graham, who was recently given a tour of Northcom headquarters at Peterson Air Force Base. The article thus appears to be a deliberate leak conducted for the purpose of accustoming the American population to the prospect of military rule.
According to Graham, “the new plans provide for what several senior officers acknowledged is the likelihood that the military will have to take charge in some situations, especially when dealing with mass-casualty attacks that could quickly overwhelm civilian resources.”
The Post account declares, “The war plans represent a historic shift for the Pentagon, which has been reluctant to become involved in domestic operations and is legally constrained from engaging in law enforcement.”
source
The officers reasoning was that he didn't believe my son, was actually my son. Apparently, I didn't look old enough to be his mother (my son, then 13, was already 6'0") & since my son had no ID, the officer wanted to search my car. I only got out of the search because one of the other officers recognized me from high school & knew the "guy" next to me was really my 13 yr old kid.
Originally posted by Asherah
The officers reasoning was that he didn't believe my son, was actually my son. Apparently, I didn't look old enough to be his mother (my son, then 13, was already 6'0") & since my son had no ID, the officer wanted to search my car. I only got out of the search because one of the other officers recognized me from high school & knew the "guy" next to me was really my 13 yr old kid.
wow I thought our family was the only one who had this happen to us. when our daughter was around 3 years old, my husband was taking her over to his moms to drop her off. he was going 5 mph over the limit and the cop nabbed him. there was a woman officer present who actually questioned my husband as to whether or not his daughter was his!!!
I seriously just couldn't believe it. It's disgusting.
Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidas
Originally posted by SystemiK
Nice find DD.
I've just invited the person who shot that video clip to join in on the discussion here, hopefully he'll accept the invitation and can provide some additional details about his confrontation.
I'll be interested to see if he does post something on here or not. If he does, I've got a lot of questions for him. No, none of them are about his name, address, or none of that, I am not a Police Officer.
I am however not stupid in the least. He stated to the Officer he was interested in sending the video in to Alex Jones, so this means he has an agenda, as well as leaving the date, day of the week, and time out of this video, means either he is not professional, or again has an agenda. When someone loads a video with words scrolling across it, they have an agenda, as evidenced by MSNBC, Fox News, and CNBC, so this guy, has an agenda of some sort, whether he is being completely honest about the content of the video, or whether he is flat out lieing in order to smash Law Enforcement's images, the truth will eventually come out.
Just because we have Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum in the White House, does not mean all Law Enforcement are following their stupid orders to the letter. This would be just as insane as saying ALL Law Enforcement Officers are Fascist Nazi Cops, or ALL Law Enforcement Officers are Crooked Cops, it's just not logical. Sorry, while I know there are people who fit that designation, they are not all that way.
Firstly have I got this right ?you used to be in law enforcement in some form?
Is it out of the question to complain officialy and sue them or will this result in harassment.
I dont have anywhere near as cool as some of the stories ive read