It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Mr. Obama is running for the Presidency of the United States of America, and being a natural born citizens is a prerequisite. What logical reason could he have to not provide the required documentation?
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Why are you assuming that it is fake? Why must it be proven real? Why don't you prove that it is not genuine?
Originally posted by LLoyd45
Mr. Obama is running for the Presidency of the United States of America, and being a natural born citizens is a prerequisite. What logical reason could he have to not provide the required documentation?
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
My understanding of the law is that the President must be a natural born citizen of the U.S.
I found this on www.worldnetdaily.com, a free press website:
)Link- www.worldnetdaily.com... )
'According to FindLaw.com, which is cited by Geraghty, the requirements that were in force from Dec. 24, 1952 to Nov. 13, 1986, encompassing the time of Obama's birth, state, "If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least 10 years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16." '
This would mean that he would not be eligible to be a candidate for President. After expending all that money to be president, it looks like he's scrambling to make sure no one knows that he's not eligible, since his mother was 18 when he was born.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
What makes you think he hasn't provided it to the proper authorities? EVEN IF what we see here is a fake, what makes you think the State Department (or whoever's job it is in the government to check such things) hasn't seen it? They've been doing this for many years. Every president has to prove his age and place of birth. Do you think that they forgot this time? Jesus! Who do people think they are demanding to see the man's personal property when we have NO RIGHT to such?
Originally posted by LLoyd45
If Barack really did release it, why would he do so to a blog rather than the media who had previously requested it? Sounds a little fishy to me, how about you?
Originally posted by coop039
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
My understanding of the law is that the President must be a natural born citizen of the U.S.
I found this on www.worldnetdaily.com, a free press website:
)Link- www.worldnetdaily.com... )
'According to FindLaw.com, which is cited by Geraghty, the requirements that were in force from Dec. 24, 1952 to Nov. 13, 1986, encompassing the time of Obama's birth, state, "If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least 10 years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16." '
This would mean that he would not be eligible to be a candidate for President. After expending all that money to be president, it looks like he's scrambling to make sure no one knows that he's not eligible, since his mother was 18 when he was born.
I read a couple pages past this and no one has responded to it yet. If this is true, the even his birth certificate wont help. His mother would have been 3 years shy of making him eligible.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
It's on his website. Fight the Smears
Originally posted by coop039
)Link- www.worldnetdaily.com... )
'According to FindLaw.com, which is cited by Geraghty, the requirements that were in force from Dec. 24, 1952 to Nov. 13, 1986, encompassing the time of Obama's birth, state, "If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least 10 years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16." '
This would mean that he would not be eligible to be a candidate for President. After expending all that money to be president, it looks like he's scrambling to make sure no one knows that he's not eligible, since his mother was 18 when he was born.
Why does everything have to be about race or religion? Can it not be simply about finding out the truth? Would you really want to put a man in the White House to run your country that wasn't qualified for the job? If you would, that's the true definition of ignorance.
Originally posted by maybereal11
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
Funny how quite this thread got? His birth certificate has been posted on his campaigns "fight the smears" website. On to another steamming pile of crap Obama lie thread with colored tones of racism, religious intolerance, pure ignorance and fear mongering.
Do you have proof of these allegations or a few sources we could review on our own? It's not that I distrust you, but the goal is to "Deny Ignorance" here, and accept nothing as true unless it is verifiable.
Let me give anyone that sees one of these rumor/stories a bit of advice....consider the source. I have traced back some of this crap to the extreme right wing....by "extreme" I mean David Duke and crew. Rolling these stories out either as "legitimate looking" articles or email campaigns via followers.
Keeping it real means to explore all possibilities without prejudice. Prejudicism can cut both ways, either for or against..
Barak Obama shouldn't be immune to criticism, but let's keep it real.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
That's June 6, 2007. Probably the day it was issued. It's likely printed on the other side and showed through when it was scanned. The person below says it's part of the "official stamp"
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
How did he get to be a Senator without someone noticing he's not even a US citizen? How did he get a US passport?
It's just silly.
I'm waiting for links to McCain's and Hillary's Birth Certificates! What have they got to hide??? Sorry. This is just so "out there"... I shake my head and wonder about the members here. Isn't there a vetting process for ATS members?? LOL
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
If Barack really did release it, why would he do so to a blog rather than the media who had previously requested it? Sounds a little fishy to me, how about you?
(b) Copies of the contents of any certificate on file in the department, certified by the department shall be considered for all purposes the same as the original, subject to the requirements of sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18.
Source
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Why are you so obsessed with what religion is checked off on their birth certificate?
I'm not. But people have been wanting to see that. So it was listed among the reasons why people wanted the BC released...I already said people don't get to pick their names or their religions at birth.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Some states had places on the certificate to list the religion of the child.
hmmmmmm ..... Wonder what it could be?
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
one should not be allowed to use that hysteria as a shield to hide their own racism and bigotry.
You best not be talking about me. If you are ... you are seriously off course.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Obama has Arab slave traders as his ancestors.
Originally posted by LLoyd45
For clarification, Does Barack Obama actually endorse this site and accept responsibility for the contents which are posted on it? I can find no reference to it if he does.
Sen. Barack Obama's campaign has taken the unprecedented step of launching its own Website to knock down false rumors about the candidate and his wife.
The site, Fight the Smears, lists every one of the Internet-driven whoppers that have surfaced during Obama's campaign, including the supposedly sensational secret videotape -- likely to surface at any moment! -- that has been alleged to show Michelle Obama using the term "whitey" from the pulpit of Trinity United Church of Christ.
The site also doesn't address why the document was turned over to KOS instead of the media? The only reason I can think of is "Plausible Deniability".
Originally posted by jamie83
Is there a reasonable explanation for why the black on green letters have a white halo around them that bleeds over the green background pattern?
Originally posted by gormly
This is a typical response from a liberal and I for one, am really tired of it.
The issue wasn't about being a US citizen, it is about being BORN IN THE US.
So regardless of how you feel about the question or the questioners intent, answer the CORRECT question and don't make one up.