It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mageofzhalfir
reply to post by zorgon
Well...it's supposed to be a brown dwarf, you know. And we are spotting those in OTHER star systems, so it's very difficult for me to believe we couldn't see it our own.
Originally posted by VIKINGANT
so yeah, a planet/dwarf star should be too much of a stretch.
""Brown dwarfs are lurking all around us," said Peter Eisenhardt, project scientist for the mission at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.
"We believe there are more brown dwarfs than stars in the nearby universe, but we haven't found many of them because they are too faint in visible light," Eisenhardt said in a NASA statement issued late Friday.
Originally posted by Combatmed1
"Readers and users should be aware that extreme theories without corroboration are embraced in this forum."
Need I say more on the subject of proof? All I know is that an ancient civilization (and a few newer ones) believed in this thing.....These are the people who's engineering know how was far more advanced than our own....If they believed that this Death Star (hehehehehehehe) existed then I am inclined to give it due thought....
There is however other slight problems faced by science that can be explained by this being a binary star system....Case in point the perturbation of Neptune....Pluto doesn't have sufficient mass to do this.....So what is doing it.....Also the recent problems with the satellites....I guess we will just have to wait and let time take its course to see if its true or a load of horse s#@$.
Originally posted by zorgon
""Brown dwarfs are lurking all around us," said Peter Eisenhardt, project scientist for the mission at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.
"We believe there are more brown dwarfs than stars in the nearby universe, but we haven't found many of them because they are too faint in visible light," Eisenhardt said in a NASA statement issued late Friday.
No matter what you need light to see em
Originally posted by Stumpy1
Originally posted by Combatmed1
"Readers and users should be aware that extreme theories without corroboration are embraced in this forum."
Need I say more on the subject of proof? All I know is that an ancient civilization (and a few newer ones) believed in this thing.....These are the people who's engineering know how was far more advanced than our own....If they believed that this Death Star (hehehehehehehe) existed then I am inclined to give it due thought....
There is however other slight problems faced by science that can be explained by this being a binary star system....Case in point the perturbation of Neptune....Pluto doesn't have sufficient mass to do this.....So what is doing it.....Also the recent problems with the satellites....I guess we will just have to wait and let time take its course to see if its true or a load of horse s#@$.
I agree with most of what you said..Although I have no idea why so many people keep saying that the engineering of some of the past civilizations was so much more advanced than our own.......I can't remember the last time anyone on the planet has assembled a non stop workforce of at least 30,000 (some people say many times that number) to build any one feature in any one place.
Is it an intentionally misleading or joke thread?
What about all the other Nibiru is FACT threads?
When I see a pic of a large planet like object I will accept it, but a pic of stars with a void is a bit if a stretch.
Originally posted by geologist
I was not confused by your original comment and understand celestial mechanics and orbits. What I would like to know is how much you and others know about such processes. How is it that Planet X/Nibiru has several orbits or one widely erratic orbit? These orbits appear to suit the needs of the believers when asked such questions about its location.
Originally posted by Cythraul
Does the OP or anyone else have any information or links concerning the possiblity of Nibiru being located in the direction of Orion or Orion's belt?
Originally posted by xnibirux
I don't believe Orion is the location of Nibiru as of now, however it does traverse into that area of the galaxy.
Originally posted by Shadow_Lord
reply to post by dk3000
But those dates do not match every page that makes up an image. Thats the problem.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by xnibirux
xniburux, when you said that 'planet X' traverses that part of the galaxy, 'that part' referring to the constellation Orion...WOW! You do know, don't you, that the Galaxy is three-dimensional? When we see a constellation, from our little vantage point in our suburb of a spiral arm, we see stars that are at various distances, but seem to form a 'pattern' because we humans evolved to see patterns, even when they don't exist.
..