It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Rockpuck
From my understanding most of these photos are taken from airplanes not satellites..
That would be quite a feat... taking star photos from an airplane...
Yup you got the mystery solved
Originally posted by weedwhacker
zorgon, clever try, but it has been already noticed...months ago!!! ...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Please be so kind to provide evidence that Google takes pictures
THEN, please tell us about the inconsistencies in your claims, point by point....OR, as you threaten, just place those that disagreee with you on 'ignore'.
I'd love to continue to engage you in a scholarly debate, but if you choose to ignore, then I am only able to draw one conclusion....
Originally posted by mageofzhalfir
Hm. Apparently you didn't mean it about "ignore". BS is still around, don't worry, I've seen him while lurking.
Originally posted by Odessy
Originally posted by Combatmed1
Originally posted by Odessy
but planet X is in our solar system...
and orion is an entirely different Galaxy!
Im not saying thats not where planet X is, but it just seems odd that it would be in that location.
If we can see another galaxy from the northern hemisphere, then we should be able to see a planet in our own solar system in that direction...
LOL, shoulda seen the meteors coming at us also but we didn't
Dwarf Star > meteors
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Please be so kind to provide evidence that Google takes pictures
www.reuters.com...
THEN, please tell us about the inconsistencies in your claims, point by point....OR, as you threaten, just place those that disagreee with you on 'ignore'.
LOL YOU are the only one on ignore... Buddhasystem was there but he vanished after John was banned... curious that....... I have no problem with those that disagree ArMaP is a prime example... I have a problem with those who add nothing constructive to a topic but prefer to derail with useless off topic babble as you are famous for...
I'd love to continue to engage you in a scholarly debate, but if you choose to ignore, then I am only able to draw one conclusion....
THAT is a skill I know you do not have... and you are welcome to draw any conclusion you would like... you have repeatedly show you do not agree with anything I present... so where is the point of debate? Just to listen to your insults? Thanks but no thanks
And just so you know I did not meet with you in Vegas because work did not give me any free time during Con Expo, not because of any 'persuasions' you may have alluded to... and John was not interested... perhaps because of your track record in comments to him? He specifically requested I NOT give you his number...
So take care and have fun... I don't have the time to waste
[edit on 26-3-2008 by zorgon]
[edit on 26-3-2008 by zorgon]
Originally posted by mageofzhalfir
If Nibiru is real, it should be way closer than Neptune and bigger, too. Everyone should be able to see it.
Originally posted by mageofzhalfir
Well...it's supposed to be a brown dwarf, you know. And we are spotting those in OTHER star systems, so it's very difficult for me to believe we couldn't see it our own.