It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Leaked images of Nibiru orbited by Planet X taken by South Pole Station Telescope

page: 9
68
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 04:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by cormac mac airt
The Oort Cloud is 50,000 AU from our sun. Based on an approximate average of the orbital velocities of the planets in our solar system, 60,000 mph, it would take over 10,000 years to reach our sun. That's one way. What would be bringing it back? Also, if traveling nearly light speed, at 1800 years one way it would be 900 times further out than the diameter of our solar system. Again, what would bring it back? The math doesn't add up.


If I have read this correctly, your maths is seriously cocked up.

Firstly, orbital velocities for planets vary between themselves and one cannot take an average of these and apply it to something utterly different. Comets, for example, are Oort cloud objects, but they reach speeds of 160,000 MPH, or 70.56 Km/s (Hailey's Comet). Almost 2.5 times the speed of Earth. Something falling inwards towards the sun from further out than Hailey's Comet and with a much greater mass would likely be going faster.

So, using these new numbers, one could surmise that something traveling from the Oort Cloud at 50,000 AU at 70 Km/s would take 3397 years, one way, so not even close to your 10,000 year figure.

What would be bringing it back? Whatever interaction exists between heavenly bodies, be it gravitational or electromagnetic. It obviously works for other bodies with elliptical orbits. As long as it doesn't exceed the escape velocity of the Sun, then it will eventually come back.

Your light speed comment is just plain silly. Who said anything about light speed? If it was going that fast, it would exceed the escape velocity of the sun and go off into space.



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 04:52 AM
link   
Astronomers are serious truthloving intelligent people. I have never met , or read an article of one that considered this issue.

If those photos'were really of a unknown object (socalled Planet X) loads of astronomers would be over it. Everyone wants a (scientific) part of that story.

Of course there are people that embrace the thought that every serious scientist is part of the conspiracy, but everybody who can think or has a scientific background knows that is ludicrous.



[edit on 24-2-2008 by Pjotr]



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 04:59 AM
link   
reply to post by Pjotr
 



If those photos'were really of a unknown object (socalled Planet X) loads of astronomers would be over it. Everyone wants a (scientific) part of that story.


Well, do not think so. Assuming Nibiru is still 4 years away you still need kit that is far beyond the reach of most universities to spot this brown dwarf IMHO.



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 05:20 AM
link   
For those that forget about these things, in the South Pole, at this time, is Summer.

As in the North Pole, during the Summer, the day lasts 24 hours, there is no night during the Summer in the same way that there is no day during the Winter, and that is one of the reasons for having a telescope on one of the Poles.

So, the people at the South Pole Telescope are now probably preparing things and waiting for the night to start.



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 05:20 AM
link   
Does this look familiar?



Its the Jovian system, or to put it in more common terms, Jupiter and its moons.

Doesn't it bear a striking resemblance to what you can see in the original video - which is probably a false colour time lapse image of this system.

If a Brown Dwarf star has passed repeatedly through the inner solar system at any time in the past couple of million years, I would suggest that we wouldn't be having this conversation, due to orbital and radiation issues that would have upset the balance of life on the planet.

People need to think about the effects that an object supposedly a third the size of our sun, and a failed star to boot, would have. It wouldn't just pass by without leaving massive devastation in its wake.



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 06:10 AM
link   
Jupiter's mass is only 318 times that of Earth, and a Brown dwarfs mass need only be a minimum of 13 times that and as a result of increase mass, the volume would actually shrink.

Jupiter is only 0.00086 solar masses, so a brown Dwarf need only be 0.01118 Solar masses, so all this assumption that a brown dwarf is 1/3rd the size of the sun is erroneous. It is more like 1% off the mass and would be significantly smaller than Jupiter is.



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 06:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by scobro
Hi.

Even if this theory turns out to be true,do you really think the authorities would willing tell you about it?


As I've said (repeatedly) before, the authorities wouldn't have any choice in the matter. Even if "they" could convince every professional astronomer to keep quiet about such a momentous discovery (not that there's a chance in Perdition of that, given the 'publish-or-perish' nature of academia), there are plenty of 'amateur' astronomers out there with very solid equipment (myself included), and access to both hard-copy outlets and electronic outlets (like ATS or Space.com). Even if this mythical Planet IX (remember, Pluto doesn't count any more) is 'only' the size of Mars, if it were close enough to make a 'close pass' in 2012, it would be visible to the naked eye, never mind to any telescope above "Wal Mart" grade.



And as for gathering data on it,well,a lot of these "specialists" are probably the same guys who decided to shoot down an out of control satellite,(and it was a lot closer than this supposed"Planet X) because they did'nt know where it was going to fall!


Ever hear the phrase 'straw man argument' ? Much as I hate to dignify silliness like this with a formal label, that's the closest *polite* term I could find. The inability to predict the impact point of the now-infamous spy satellite had nothing to do with a failure to locate, identify, or track it. Those "specialists" knew its location to less than a foot. What they did *not* know was the exact 'shape' of the upper fringes of the atmosphere. They have a good general idea, but there are enough variations up there to make the exact prediction of impact points for an uncontrolled reentry a guessing game.

That has no bearing at all on their ability to find and track something of planetary size, or to plot a fairly exact orbit for such an object if and when they find it



If this thing is coming in 2012,why tell us now and have four years of blind panic on their hands,when they would probably rather tell us at the last possible moment.


I'm reminded of Groucho Marx's famous question for contestants on his game show. "Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Answer yes or no." It's a no-win question...either answer makes you look bad. NASA is in a similar position regarding Planet IX. If they say nothing, they're part of the Government Cover-Up (tm). If they say it's not there, they're Lying to the People to Avoid a Mass Panic (tm). If they say it is there, they immediately lose any credibility whatsoever with every group except the Zeta Reticulan Society for Interstellar Telepathic Fearmongering. It's a no-win for NASA.



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 06:38 AM
link   
Not the best attempt at evidence I have seen, the pixelation and ms paint looking colour manipulation don't help the cause. However, this whole idea of planet x, is perhaps slightly interesting, purely because of the fact we would get a clear idea of the possibility of it, long before the end of 2012, unlike most of the other theories out there.



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 06:40 AM
link   
reply to post by Terrapop
 


Ya it's hard to say.. I found those on the net and thought it would good to add to your post. I'd like to use the same methods and take my own picture of the sun to see if there is anything like in those photos, but it's been cloudy over here the last couple days... I guess all you need is a welders mask then take the picture through that and you should be able to see the planet X anomolly.. I'll try to get a picture from where I'm at in Idaho and if there is anything I find in the images I'll post them... Chances are I won't see much, but that would be really cool if i did... I'll update later.



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 07:12 AM
link   
Right, first off, I read the first 5 pages, and then skipped here, because the same points were getting rehashed over and over. First of all, for MY theory to be plausible, you have to use the electrical star model, alot of people don't believe in this at the moment, but that will change soon.

First off, I personally believe that Nibiru is a planet about the size of Jupiter, maybe a bit smaller, and has its own collection of moons, not a star system, but ofc, I could be wrong.

First things first,I believe all planets/ stars are essentially HUGE rotating magnets, with liquid metal rotating at incredibly high speeds on the surface of the 'metal core' (these rotating magnetic fields is what draws debris in, that would eventually form our crust), these factors, as well as the 'quantum foam' in space can account for the Van Allen belts, the EFFECT of gravity that seems to shape everything we know and understand. So, this takes into account that the sun, is essentially, one of these 'super charged' ball bearings, receiving energy from all over the universe, and dispersing it throughout the solar system.

What if, there was a huge celestial body, heading toward our solar system? in the standard model, this wouldn't cause much disturbances, apart from certain gravitational 'fluctuations'. If we take a look at what happens, when say 2 magnets ++ come together, what happens? they will repel each other, now, say for instance, this magnet was the size of Jupiter, and it was hurtling towards a magnet the size of the sun? would it just 'slip' out the way like when you try and join magnets? I don't think so, I believe that they are 'locked in' in a fixed pattern, and that this is what is causing the anomalies we are seeing.

Global warming?
www.telegraph.co.uk.../news/2004/07/18/wsun18.xml
Sun is heating up, I think anyway, as this object is hurtling towards it, and all that energy in between them is building up, and up and up.

Global warming a global event? not so sure...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
This could be due to the 'static' energy building up between, the sun mainly, but also all the other planets in our solar system, remember those magnets i was talking about? + + well what if we were in between them? what would it be like, that energy has to go somewhere? how is it transformed? and what into. All planets in our system are undergoing massive changes, and not just heating up, but cooling down etc. read the second link, very interesting implications.

This must have happened before..
www.rense.com...
It is a theory, in the electric star model, that certain craters and gauges maybe have been caused by 'electrical discharge', bolts of electricity. I believe that this was caused last time the planet/star came through our system. (i couldn't get thunderbolts.info to work, so rense will have to do.)

thanks. EMM

[edit on 24-2-2008 by ElectroMagnetic Multivers]



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 07:38 AM
link   
Were are the other stars????



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 07:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by metaldemon2000
reply to post by Estess
 


Well i dont know about 4000 years but yes there is evidence of polar shifting in earlier times. This is why Earth wobbles as it rotates. It is said Earth was either struck by a rather large object many years ago or is continuously being affected by the gravity of a massive object. If indeed a planet comes in close orbit of Earth every 4000 or so years this would explain it.


Here is some information about polar shifting

Recent work by scientists and geologists Adam Maloof of Princeton University and Galen Halverson of Paul Sabatier University in Toulouse, France, indicates that Earth indeed rebalanced itself around 800 million years ago during the Precambrian time period.[8] They tested this idea by studying magnetic minerals in sedimentary rocks in a Norwegian archipelago. Using these minerals, Maloof and Halverson found that the north pole shifted more than 50 degrees — about the current distance between Alaska and the equator — in less than 20 million years. This reasoning is supported by a record of changes in sea level and ocean chemistry in the Norwegian sediments that could be explained by true polar wander, the team reports in the September–October 2006 issue of the Geological Society of America Bulletin.[9]

Research using GPS, conducted by Geoffrey Blewitt of the University of Nevada, has shown that normal seasonal changes in the distribution of ice and water cause minor movements of the poles

en.wikipedia.org...

Yes there was a polar shift that happened approx. 800 million years ago. You'll further notice that there is no indication of regular shifting approx. every 3600 years. Hope this helps.



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 07:59 AM
link   
reply to post by Terrapop
 


No, SPT is a microwave telescope, and the optical part of the telescope has (I suppose it is already active, the text I read talked about a future optical part) a IR blocking filter.



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 08:30 AM
link   
reply to post by Brother Stormhammer
 


Hi Brother.

You may well have the equipment to be able to see whether this thing is or is'nt out there,but do you have the ability to travel to the Antarctic to see it? (Since that is the supposed trajectory.

Peace.



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 08:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by stumason
Jupiter's mass is only 318 times that of Earth, and a Brown dwarfs mass need only be a minimum of 13 times that and as a result of increase mass, the volume would actually shrink.

Jupiter is only 0.00086 solar masses, so a brown Dwarf need only be 0.01118 Solar masses, so all this assumption that a brown dwarf is 1/3rd the size of the sun is erroneous. It is more like 1% off the mass and would be significantly smaller than Jupiter is.


Brown dwarfs occupy the mass range between that of large gas giant planets and the lowest mass stars; this upper limit is between 75 and 80 Jupiter masses.



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 08:37 AM
link   
reply to post by jfj123
 


Yep, but I was going for the lower limit to show that they don't have to be that huge.



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 09:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by neformore

People need to think about the effects that an object supposedly a third the size of our sun, and a failed star to boot, would have. It wouldn't just pass by without leaving massive devastation in its wake.



Like the Asteroids Belt, maybe ?



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 10:43 AM
link   
Okay, I'm just going to jump in here and spout my mouth off about something I have not studied at all, but I did watch that 5 part series about Planet X that someone posted (sorry I didn't catch your name just your scary alien avatar) earlier. That guy really had me going until one sentence. He said when all heck breaks loose TOPSIDE, the government will implement martial law and "call in the troops from around the world" to enforce it. So how can this be!

A) Sounds like he's saying this will only affect America, so therefore the forces and troops we have around the world will be able to just come on over and enforce martial law. Like how fly in a plane? Planes fly when the country is in mass panic and chaos?

B) The government is underground in bunkers, so he says, how are they communicating to such troops around the world and telling them to come back home? And why the hell, would they come home to enforce martial law? If it's just us that are suffering and they are fine and dandy elsewhere in the world what person military or otherwise would come back here to the madness??????? There is no government to enforce penalties for AWOL status, so why come back?

That one statement alone was enough proof to me that this guy is a whackado who just wants to scare the pee out of people for no reason. He's a nutjob, plain and simple!



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 10:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by Terrapop
The leaked pictures shown in the following video are allegedly taken by the Amundsen-Scot American SPT (South Pole Telescope):

www.disclose.tv...

What do you all think about this? Fake or first proof of what is to come?


Hi Terrapop, Nibiru, Planet X, or is it the Destroyer comet, what is the real deal here.
If it is what is claimed in that video, our whole solar system will absolutely be destroyed, so I don’t think that is the case.
Here is another possibility, and you must rule nothing out, right?
I think this is a more realistic explanation, and possible much closer to the truth, but I cant proof it in any way.
But it good take at least the heat of the fan a bit, because 2012 is very nearby.
And when nothing happened around 2012 or 2013 in relation with the object claimed in the video, then we must focus on 2255.

This is an “Alien” view on it, so you be warned.


There exist a very large comet who the “Aliens” called the Destroyer comet (ca 1.72x mass /size of earth).
This Comet has cause immense destruction in Earth history on several passes in our solar system, and it will come back as the “Aliens” say again in 2255, so that buy us some time.


But until then, the "Destroyer" is still out there somewhere with a long tail of small particles. Just like the pictures, but with the difference that this is one object.
In ancient times the Destroyer also menaced our ancestors causing years of domination and cruelty. The Alien message is, that it is the legends of the destroyer comet that is behind the talk of Nibiru and 12th planet.



posted on Feb, 24 2008 @ 10:46 AM
link   
reply to post by Infadel
 


sorry bud, but 3600years ago Rome didnt even exist

Rome was founded in 700 bc roughly.

just thought id point that out for you...

anyways, interesting thread, despite how dubious it may be lol



new topics

top topics



 
68
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join