Leaked images of Nibiru orbited by Planet X taken by South Pole Station Telescope

reply to post by undo


I am weeeh... I was confuse myself. It just a lot simpler than we were making it.

Behind it all is some serious math on the part of the myans and modern astronomers that we don't see. They both have calculated the movement of the planets and stars accurately. ->||BLack Box||-> we don't have to know how it works.
2012-doomsday we all die ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
not really but time is a completely man made system of counting how many times we go around the sun, the units are completely arbitrary.

Originally posted by Bigwhammy
reply to post by undo

 

I am weeeh... I was confuse myself. It just a lot simpler than we were making it.

Behind it all is some serious math on the part of the myans and modern astronomers that we don't see. They both have calculated the movement of the planets and stars accurately. ->||BLack Box||-> we don't have to know how it works.
2012-doomsday we all die ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
not really but time is a completely man made system of counting how many times we go around the sun, the units are completely arbitrary.

hrm, well if you say so

but i didn't think i was talking about the units. i thought i was talking about the solstices. lol you are confusing me - that's not on the list of acceptable teaching techniques!

this topic has never intriqued me...



Mod Note: One Line Post – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 24-2-2008 by Jbird]

Originally posted by cormac mac airt
The Oort Cloud is 50,000 AU from our sun. Based on an approximate average of the orbital velocities of the planets in our solar system, 60,000 mph, it would take over 10,000 years to reach our sun. That's one way. What would be bringing it back? Also, if traveling nearly light speed, at 1800 years one way it would be 900 times further out than the diameter of our solar system. Again, what would bring it back? The math doesn't add up.

Ok, lets do a small calculation...

Recently, researchers discovered what might be a brown dwarf wandering alone through space just 13 light-years from Earth -- practically in our backyard. And there might be many more, some even closer, researchers say. But they would be cooler, fainter and even tougher to spot with existing telescopes.
www.space.com...

The velocity of Brown dwarfs, like neutron stars could be well above 500 miles/sec. That means they could travel 15,768,000,000 per year or 78,840,000,000 miles in 5 years or approx 80,000,000,000 miles. Pluto is 3,000,000,000 miles away on the average.

That means at present, the BD is about 26 times the distance Pluto is from here. It may be extremely faint, emitting negligible IR/UV radiation. Is that probably the reason why it hasn’t been detected as yet? It may be heading toward the Solar System at a breathtaking 1,800,000 miles per hour!! A tad faster than my Ferrari!!

Seriously, a fairly large object traveling at that velocity, just 'skimming' our Solar System would be disastrous. At that speed it's probably Armageddon in 5 years time! That's 2012/2013!! Does that date ring a bell? You bet it does!!

Cheers!

[edit on 24-2-2008 by mikesingh]

reply to post by undo


I was being a little silly sorry.

David Flynn does a 2012 lecture. He correlates so much information it's a little intimidating. I watched but honestly I can't say much about it other than. David is really intense. It's like info overload.

Originally posted by goosdawg
We'll be passing through the galactic plane in the same year the Mayan calender ends/resets - which just so happens to coincide with the Gregorian calender date of December 21, 2012 - the astronomical winter solstice.

Hmmmm ermmm no we crossed the Galactic Plane 2 Million years ago and are moving out... here is the techno babble...

From the book: _Guide to the Galaxy_, 1994; Henbest and Couper; Cambridge University Press.

The Sun is moving towards Lambda Herculis at 20 kilometers per second or 12 miles per second. Or in units "per hour": 72,000 kilometers per hour or 45,000 miles per hour. This speed is in a frame of rest if the other stars were all standing still.

The three-dimensional picture of the Sun's movement through the Galaxy is a little more complicated.

The Sun is moving upwards, out of the plane of the Milky Way, at a speed of 7 kilometers per second. Currently the Sun lies 50 light-years above the mid-plane of the galaxy, and its motion is steadily carrying it further away.

But the gravitational pull of the stars in the Galactic (Milky Way) plane is slowing down the Sun's escape. The astronomer Frank Bash estimates that in 14 million years the sun will reach its maximum height above the Galactic disk. From that 250 light-year position, it will be pulled back towards the plane of the Galaxy. Passing through, it will travel to a point 250 light-years below the disk, then oscillate upwards again to reach its present position 66 million years from now. We crossed the plane 2 million years ago. We are currently in the thick of the galactic disk and our view of distant regions is largely blocked by dust but 10-20 million years from now, our motion will allow a full view of our starry galaxy.

I put this together when we were recruiting navigators for our spaceship... do you have any idea how hard it is to plot your way home?

Well here it is if your interested
www.thelivingmoon.com...

Point is we will not be crossing the galactic plane in 2012... However I hear there is some astrological 'allignment' that does coincide


This motion of our solar system perpendicular to the plane does seem to support the fact that Milky Way is not Sol's home galaxy

[edit on 24-2-2008 by zorgon]

I pulled up Redshift on my computer and plugged in the date December 21, 2012. The positions of all the planets in the solar system is nothing special. They are not aligned. The alignment per the Maya must be external to the solar system. Something about the alignment with Sol and the center of the Milkyway galaxy I presume.

I did not see mention in the thread about the shadow on the OP film... in the closeup it shows a big shadow on the red 'dark star'. The shadow looks well defined and black...

What is the light source casting that shadow?

Originally posted by lostinspace
I pulled up Redshift on my computer and plugged in the date December 21, 2012. The positions of all the planets in the solar system is nothing special. They are not aligned. The alignment per the Maya must be external to the solar system. Something about the alignment with Sol and the center of the Milkyway galaxy I presume.

what about this december 21?
just out of curiosity.
what about mayan constellations? anyone know?
somebody must have a list of what those 2012 alignments are supposed to be.

Originally posted by Bigwhammy
reply to post by undo

 

I was being a little silly sorry.

David Flynn does a 2012 lecture. He correlates so much information it's a little intimidating. I watched but honestly I can't say much about it other than. David is really intense. It's like info overload.

aye, have you heard his interview on PID radio? it's an older interview, and potentially the only radio interview other than C2C that he has ever done. it was a podcast, actually. about 10 minutes into it, i was already going into data overload. guy has more info in his head than an entire library, i think. i wonder if he's human lol (that was a joke).

Originally posted by zorgon

What is the light source casting that shadow?

that's a very good question.
i'd like to know the answer to this as well.

i keep thinking the red planet in the sumerian texts is
mars.

reply to post by Bigwhammy


ever heard of jack vanimpe he tawks of thing that were talked about over the past today and what is in the news for the future kinda what do you thinK

reply to post by zorgon


i think i understand the theorys presented in these numbers but i am a little confused on the wording i understand that the thought of space travel was laughed at but in time has be proven to be fact, leads me to believe that it has been in front of me the whole time...

a little slow at typing these days... i am sorry

Sitchin has recently put forth his own date for the next passage of Nibiru in the year 2085, but the date most talked about is 2012 which marks the end of the Maya calendar.

SOURCE

2085 Dagnabbit I won't be around to see that...(unless they hand out those pills to everyone )

Nibiru (the planet associated with Marduk in Babylonian cosmology) is a central element of Sitchin's theory. He claims it was a tenth planet (twelfth to those who included the Sun and Moon) which followed a long, elliptical orbit, reaching the inner solar system every 3600 years.

SOURCE

Planet X Tenth Planet... makes sense... Twelth Planet? for those who include the sun and moon? Now how stupid is that if you don't include the rest of the planet size moons in the solar system

:shk:

Okay lets stay with X or 10...

Now lets add XI, XII, XIII, XIV, and XV

XI Xena with Moon Gabrielle bigger than Pluto (2003 UB313)
- - Pluto - -
XII 2005 FY9 No Moons
XIII 2003 EL61 Oval with two Moons
XIV Sedna
XV Quaoar

These I are listed in order of size not date of discovery



Well so much for Planet X





Edit to add...

Here is the reference I was taliking about...

Dec. 21st of 2012 is merely the time when Earth, Sun,
and Galactic Center align so that the Sun appears from
Earth to rise through GC.

[edit on 24-2-2008 by zorgon]

Originally posted by StoneGarden
reply to post by Bigwhammy

 

ever heard of jack vanimpe he tawks of thing that were talked about over the past today and what is in the news for the future kinda what do you thinK

i think he's an interesting read. i've studied most of his prophecy writings. i made a point of studying anything with the word biblical prophecy on it, for 20+ years.

he's made some mistakes though, like his belief that the tribulation would begin around 2002. of course, considering the events over the last 6 years, that's certainly an intriguing idea. i don't think he still believes that, though.

Look at the color red. Doesn't anyone use graphic programs? Doesn't anyone find it strange that the color red is almost exactly like one of the boldest color red of graphic programs?

What about light wave frequencies? Do you not realize if "planet x" was traveling the speed it would have to travel to reach our obit by 2012 it would be more BLUE then it would be RED???

Doplar shift anyone? Anyone?

A NASA 1992 news relase said in part, “Unexplained deviations in the orbit of Uranus and Neptune point to a larger outer solar system body of 4 to 8 Earth masses, on a highly tilted orbit, beyond seven billion miles from the sun.” Since then, NASA has been silent. A Planet X fly-by could be much worse than an asteroid collision- depending upon size of the object.

A big telescope, as high as a seven-story building, with a main mirror measuring 32 1/2 feet across was built at the Amundsen-Scott Station in the Antarctica- looming over a barren plain of ice that gets colder than anywhere else on the planet. It was officially operational in December of 2007. This sophisticated Infrared observatory is perfectly positioned to search out a Planet X- if it exists, that we might somehow save our planet.

www.2012finalfantasy.com...

For clarification: I am not the creator of the video that I posted.

reply to post by zorgon


Here's yet another view:

The discovery of May 30th 2006 reveals that the apparent placement of Earth at the nexus of these two galaxies has far greater significance than any had yet imagined--

Earth and her Sun star system is not aligned with the near 90 degree off-angle galaxy in the sky (now) before us "because the Milky Way is simply not our parent galaxy."

We have just established that we are still angled with the smaller parent galaxy but appear to have now gravitationally broken free the last time circling down through the disc, and are now moving independently -- back up-- and being gravitationally pulled into position as in a parallel parking fashion -- to the center of gravity of the Milky Way whirlpool arms and disc. It now appears to be only a matter of time before we're fully pulled into the angle of our new home, the Milky Way as we approach the center of the Milky Way disc in the year 2012.

With the aid of infrared telescopes, and super computers, scientists were recently able to distinguish the Sagittarius Dwarf presence, position, and looping shape out from the mass of background stars and create a new star map putting our solar system right into the intersecting stream of the two galaxies.

Source | THE 5 DISCOVERIES

So according to this, we're heading "North" from under the Galactic plane.

Who knows?

reply to post by Incarnated


That's exactly what I thought - that shade of red is so deep, the whole graphic looks as if it was done in MS Paint! This isn't a 'leaked' image, it's something that's been haste fully put together with some cheap software, just to get some feel-good conspiracy kudos.

reply to post by Incarnated


Maybe this is because the SPT is an infrared telescope? Just my 2ct.