Leaked images of Nibiru orbited by Planet X taken by South Pole Station Telescope

reply to post by jfj123
You actually analyzed this video?

NOT

reply to post by zorgon


You mean the 57 second video you posted that says nothing about planet x or any planetary bodies 3600 year orbit and which includes old info that has since been updated by new findings from the Voyager 2 probe sent to Neptune? You mean that analysis? Uh yes I did. Thanks for asking though

[edit on 25-2-2008 by jfj123]

reply to post by Young minded old soul


Magnetic fields travel trough the planets (in fact, I think that there is not a way of stopping a magnetic field), but electrical discharges happen between electric fields.

If you have a positively charged electric field, then all the particles inside it will have the same polarity, so they have a tendency to repel each other.

If this positively charged field gets near a negatively charged field then the difference in charge creates a current of electrically charged particles between both fields, but only between its "surface", because the particles inside each field only "see" particles with the same charge, only those on the outside can participate in a discharge that will make (or that will try to make) both fields reach the same charge.

This explanation may suffer from some lack of scientific wording and may even be inaccurate, but this is what I remember from my classes, more than 20 years ago.

Originally posted by jfj123
Uh yes I did. Thanks for asking though

But you missed sooo much....

Ah well lets see if anyone else gets it...

Originally posted by Frankenchrist
I just cant believe this, in fact I cant believe anything here anymore. nothing ever pans out. nothing. of all the preditctions, from Serpo to drones. NOTHING is ever true. NOTHING. We just live on Earth. and thats it. period.

Yeah, I know how you feel. It sure is disappointing. The only positive thing you can maybe say is that all the tens of thousands of people who have seen UFOs or had other kinds of odd encounters are probably not all mistaken. A few of them have to be right. Unfortunately, they all still add up to basically nothing and none of it ever quite adds up to any kind of good proof... of anything. So you have some kind of phenomenon, but it doesn't lead anywhere.

And on top of it all, you've got a lot of people who absolutely see aliens behind every bush and in every blurry NASA photo, and if you don't see them then you're just a close-minded naysayer. Sick of those idiots.

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by jfj123
Uh yes I did. Thanks for asking though

But you missed sooo much....

Ah well lets see if anyone else gets it...

Unless you didn't post the entire video, I don't think I missed anything. I watched all 57 seconds of the video. Are you saying the info I posted is wrong? If so, please show me.

If there is something else, why not just post it instead of being cryptic?

Originally posted by jfj123

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by jfj123
Uh yes I did. Thanks for asking though

But you missed sooo much....

Ah well lets see if anyone else gets it...

Unless you didn't post the entire video, I don't think I missed anything. I watched all 57 seconds of the video. Are you saying the info I posted is wrong? If so, please show me.

If there is something else, why not just post it instead of being cryptic?

Ah, jfj, my friend.

You have encountered a common strategy employed by our friend z...who has, I think, granted me the privelege of being one of the 'two' on his ignore list...a rather smug, and if I may say, off-topic brief post that seems to be teasing. Of course, I tried teasing back, and then I got into trouble...maybe taunting is a better word, than 'teasing'...

But, back to the point...many have convincingly argued the basic fallacy of a mass as large as postulated...varies from one-third the mass of our Sun, the twice the size if Jupiter...lots of theories as to size. Bottom line is, anyone who understands the basics of celestial mechanics, and gravity (Einstein's gravity, just for the sake of argument...seems to have worked for a while, so far, especialy in gravitational lensing of light, effects that have been observed for decades...) knows that a 'rogue' planet ( or brown dwarf, 'failed' star, or supermassive gas giant ), even if it is in an extremely eccentric, 3,600 year orbit, would fundamentaly alter (perturb) the other bodies in the Solar System.

We would not have had a four-billion history of Earth, with all of the various Epochs that have come and gone!

UNLESS!!!! And this is a light bulb moment, ...a 'rogue' mini-system just happens to be sauntering by, or we are hurtling towards one another at thousands....no! MILLIONS of kilometers per hour!? Not that this 'Niburu' has been in a stable 3,600 year orbit for billions of years, but is instead, an interloper, ready to rain destruction!

Sounds like an excellent pitch for the next big BlockBuster Hollywood movie, now that I think about it. Gonna start writing it now....

How much time do I have?

[ did some text corrections, and speling...er, spelling... Had a thought to add, will everyone take some time and look at ArMap's posts? He knows his stuff, and knows how to say it very, very well...]



[edit on 26-2-2008 by weedwhacker]

[more typos...bum left hand, sorry]

[edit on 26-2-2008 by weedwhacker]

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by jfj123
Uh yes I did. Thanks for asking though

But you missed sooo much....

Ah well lets see if anyone else gets it...

Hi zorgon, I think it is what he says right from the start, until the date 14 aug 1978?

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by jfj123
Uh yes I did. Thanks for asking though

But you missed sooo much....

Ah well lets see if anyone else gets it...

Why dont you just come out and say what it is everyone missed?

Thats a bit suspicious is it not? Maybe if you were more forward in answering peoples queries, they wouldnt be so skeptical of your claims

From what I remember there are 3 times it can be seen, as it passes pluto, as it passes Jupiter, and once it is here, it will be behind our moon.

The Cause of the planets 'Van Allen belts' is the mars size dynamo in the middle of our planet, This is were the 'concentration' of EM radiation is, and this is were the 'arc' would try and jump to, so yes, it would very much hit earth, and as I stated before, this is what causes the 'trenches' and craters we see on earth, mars and the moon, electrical discharge scarring.

Someone stated that they need physical proof? go to the link i provided earlier, this shows that the ENTIRE solar system is heating up and our star is getting brighter, now, with the standard model, this is impossible, the sun should be getting weaker over time... So what is causing this phenomena? I believe it's a huge, highly charged planet hurtling towards us at millions of light years, essentially feeding our solar system alot of energy, which has to be transfered somewhere, as it cannot be 'destroyed', transfered to heat, light and when close enough, discharge.

thanks. EMM

Originally posted by zorgon

NASA Lead astronomer acknowledges the Ancient Nibiru model for Planet X.

I have a few 'issues' with this one, but I will wait to see reactions

Well the immediate reaction is "how can something invented in the 1970s be called 'ancient'

Originally posted by ElectroMagnetic Multivers
The Cause of the planets 'Van Allen belts' is the mars size dynamo in the middle of our planet, This is were the 'concentration' of EM radiation is, and this is were the 'arc' would try and jump to, so yes, it would very much hit earth, and as I stated before, this is what causes the 'trenches' and craters we see on earth, mars and the moon, electrical discharge scarring.
thanks. EMM

Are you saying that the craters and canyons on earth are a result of the Van Allenbelts?

What happened to meteorite hits and tectonic movement?

This is a laughable concept

reply to post by ElectroMagnetic Multivers

From what I remember there are 3 times it can be seen, as it passes pluto, as it passes Jupiter, and once it is here, it will be behind our moon.

The Cause of the planets 'Van Allen belts' is the mars size dynamo in the middle of our planet, This is were the 'concentration' of EM radiation is, and this is were the 'arc' would try and jump to, so yes, it would very much hit earth, and as I stated before, this is what causes the 'trenches' and craters we see on earth, mars and the moon, electrical discharge scarring.

Can you post evidence to support any of these conclusions?

I'd be very interested in learning how an object that's going to be visible at the distance of Pluto can remain unseen for the rest of its approach with exception of when it passes Jupiter and even more interested in how such occult knowledge is acquired.

There is some sketchy evidence from geological records of a periodic nature to mass extinctions on earth but the period is something like 26 million years and we're roughly in the middle of one of those cycles right now so there's plenty of time to build a bunker

reply to post by Pilgrum


The mass extinction at present is the genocide of everything that hasn't adapted succesfully to man's existence.

Originally posted by ElectroMagnetic Multivers
The Cause of the planets 'Van Allen belts' is the mars size dynamo in the middle of our planet, This is were the 'concentration' of EM radiation is, and this is were the 'arc' would try and jump to, so yes, it would very much hit earth, and as I stated before, this is what causes the 'trenches' and craters we see on earth, mars and the moon, electrical discharge scarring.

Whoa, this is news to me, I must have been asleep in several of my geology classes. Ever here of plate tectonics and orogenies (mountain building), at least on earth. Can you provide the source/reference to his statement. I know several if not all the geologists at the USGS that would be interested as well as several university professors.

On the moon, it was mostly asteroid impacts. Mars is still under study but I do not recall electrical discharges as the mechanism for surface topography. Most likely wind and water erosion and possibly glaciation.

[edit on 26-2-2008 by geologist]

reply to post by ElectroMagnetic Multivers


EMM, two questions please: How can an object be 'behind the Moon'? The diameter of the Moon's orbit is 500,000 miles, give or take. It is a moving object that occludes only a fraction of an arc-minute in the sky.

Secondly, what did you mean when you said it is approaching at 'millions of light years'? That isn't making any sense at all.

reply to post by OzWeatherman


Didn't realize i said that...oh wait, no I never

I said the Van Allen belts are caused by the big ball of rotating metal that is our core. I then said that some 'craters' and 'canyons' on moon, mars and earth MAY be caused by the passing of this 'niburu' and create electrical discharge which scarred the earth, moon or mars. This is only a theory, and if you would like to know more on 'electrical discharge scarring' I posted a link a page or 2 back, so refer to there, if that doesn't satisfy you, you could go on tunderbolts.info, although, when I was trying to link it the other night, the page was down.

thanks. EMM

The Scars of Planetary Violence

A survey of evidence pointing to high-energy electric events in the organization of the solar system, when planets moved on unstable courses through powerful electric fields. In a challenge to today’s planetary science, the authors claim that the most distinctive surface features of solid planets and moons can only be produced by electrical discharge.

www.thunderbolts.info...

The mention of the electrical discharge, applied to the 'nibiru passing' hypothesis was my own.

reply to post by jfj123


I think I read the 'positions' of Nibiru in Sitchin's 'The Twelth Planet'.

See links above for the Electrical Discharge.


[edit on 26-2-2008 by ElectroMagnetic Multivers]