It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This forum is for the discussion of contemporary world events, with a general focus on conspiracies and/or cover-ups that may not easily fit into other topical forums. Discussion topics and follow-up responses in this forum will likely tend to lean in favor of conspiracies, scandals, and cover-ups.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
You're right Centurion, if I'm going to be killed, I want it to be by an American so I can be proud of it.
That's ridiculous. There's no evidence that says the proportionate crime rate committed by illegal aliens is any higher than those committed by citizens.
Again, your logic is flawed.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
so.....your logic is kind of flawed.
Originally posted by _Phoenix_
Seperation leads to ignorance, which leads to wars, violence and death.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Ahh, no it is not flawed. It's the friggin truth. You just don't want to face it. If they weren't here, there would not be this story. Truth. Plain and simple.
Misleading Vividness is a fallacy in which a very small number of particularly dramatic events are taken to outweigh a significant amount of statistical evidence. This sort of "reasoning" has the following form:
1. Dramatic or vivid event X occurs (and is not in accord with the majority of the statistical evidence) .
2. Therefore events of type X are likely to occur.
This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because the mere fact that an event is particularly vivid or dramatic does not make the event more likely to occur, especially in the face of significant statistical evidence.
1. A and B are associated on a regular basis.
2. Therefore A is the cause of B.
The general idea behind this fallacy is that it is an error in reasoning to conclude that one thing causes another simply because the two are associated on a regular basis. More formally, this fallacy is committed when it is concluded that A is the cause of B simply because they are associated on a regular basis. The error being made is that a causal conclusion is being drawn from inadequate evidence.
The fallacy of Division is committed when a person infers that what is true of a whole must also be true of its constituents and justification for that inference is not provided.
There are two main variants of the general fallacy of Division:
The first type of fallacy of Division is committed when 1) a person reasons that what is true of the whole must also be true of the parts and 2) the person fails to justify that inference with the required degree of evidence. More formally, the "reasoning" follows this sort of pattern:
1. The whole, X, has properties A, B, C, etc.
2. Therefore the parts of X have properties A, B, C, etc.
That this line of reasoning is fallacious is made clear by the following case: 4 is an even number. 1 and 3 are parts of 4. Therefore 1 and 3 are even.
Also Known as: Biased Statistics, Loaded Sample, Prejudiced Statistics, Prejudiced Sample, Loaded Statistics, Biased Induction, Biased Generalization
Description of Biased Sample
This fallacy is committed when a person draws a conclusion about a population based on a sample that is biased or prejudiced in some manner. It has the following form:
1. Sample S, which is biased, is taken from population P.
2. Conclusion C is drawn about Population P based on S.
The person committing the fallacy is misusing the following type of reasoning, which is known variously as Inductive Generalization, Generalization, and Statistical Generalization:
1. X% of all observed A's are B''s.
2. Therefore X% of all A's are Bs.
The fallacy is committed when the sample of A's is likely to be biased in some manner. A sample is biased or loaded when the method used to take the sample is likely to result in a sample that does not adequately represent the population from which it is drawn.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
I should also remind all that the 'ignore my neighbor' xenophobic policy is what leads to illegal immigration anyway. Like Centurion said, not my country=not my problem. Until it becomes your problem. Sending them home to crap will only lead to them coming back right?
If we sent them home to a better place than they left, they'd have no reason to leave. Moreover, they likely wouldn't have left in the first place. We're in a world where we simply can't isolate ourselves. It's stupid, shortsighted, and economically damaging.
Help Mexico fix it's economy, raise the value of the peso, and there's no need to come over, except to vacation.
Originally posted by marg6043
I am sorry to say that the way our nation is doing with the economy right now we can not afford to fix any other nation in the world as we are fighting a trillion dollar war in the middle east and a rising out of control national debt,(you know what every legal american even the unborn owns to the governemnt) so what can we do.
We need to fix our problems first.
[edit on 22-2-2008 by marg6043]
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
I agree that we need to fix the problems that we have caused ourselves, but as I mentioned before, the isolationist policies of the US throughout history is part of the reason that Mexico is in the economic condition that it is in. Mexico is our problem, and illegal immigration won't be solved by large fences or vigilante cowboys in pickup trucks driving up and down the border.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Then answer me this....
If she had gone through the naturalization process and still killed 4 people in this accident, would it have been ok? Acceptable?
Description of Appeal to Pity
An Appeal to Pity is a fallacy in which a person substitutes a claim intended to create pity for evidence in an argument. The form of the "argument" is as follows:
1. P is presented, with the intent to create pity.
2. Therefore claim C is true.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Don't tell me how I feel about the victims cap'n.