NORTHCOM Ready To Implement Martial Law

NORTHCOM Ready To Implement Martial Law

www.roguegovernment.com

In a press release, the military command stated that the organization is ready to respond to any homeland defense or civil support mission requirement. Considering that George W. Bush has signed a directive making the President a dictator over continuity of government operations in the case of a catastrophic emergency, any homeland defense or civil support mission requirement would include the implementation of martial law. Below is the full press release which contains all sorts of wonderfully crafted politically correct language from their PR people that attempts to convince us that the use of the military domestically for all declared emergencies is perfect acceptable.

(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.blacklistednews.com

Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
Police set to search for guns at homes
FBI 'Deputizing' Businesses and granting them 'shoot to kill' rights!

As the article states, this is an alarming development IMO. The way these things are stated makes it feel like it is going to happen real soon. There are so many things that seem to be signs of martial law being implemented. The only problem I see is that we don't have to troops to do so. But, according to NORTHCOM, we are prepared for anything.

www.roguegovernment.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

Palehorse,

When i joined this site in 2004, i said that our president would do anything to stay in power. People laughed. I was called crazy. Well, you never know who's on the other side of the typewriter.....
I hit the nail on the head- and it was all "gut" feeling, the first time i saw him and Cheney on TV declaring victory, i told myself, self, we are now screwed!
Very simple- sometimes the simplest explanations are the ones that pan out.

God help us all.

Nothing more scarier than this:

www.progressive.org...

reply to post by dgtempe


Good call dg. Did I see that it was your birthday recently? Mine was last week. If it was yours, happy belated.
On topic....I had pretty bad feelings as well when he got elected. When the son follows the father, in this case,.......doesn't make for a good future. GW's whole presidency seems to have revenge written all over it. If somehow he is to extend his power...look out. And a question I have is, if Bush was to declare martial law say in November, what happens to the next elected president? Do they have to wait or do they inherit the current situation? Either way, it can't be good.

pluckynoonez: I put that under related threads in the OP. And yes, it is VERY scary.

[edit on 2/10/2008 by palehorse23]

Plenty of people around here have said the current president would stay in power. I still don't think it will be happening quite like that yet. I am sure there always was a plan for the military to take control in an emergency situation. Now it just may be done with out the support of congress. I did not real the full article so does any one know if there is a time limit on it also?

Just to clear the air,
The original news article says nothing about martial law.

That was an interpretation by "rogue government"

reply to post by dgtempe




DG,

You know what is weird. Your afraid of Bush and his people and I’m afraid of Clintons and their people.

Weird Huh.

reply to post by Quazga


I still believe it is a fair judgment to make though.

USNORTHCOM has prepared detailed plans for responding to situations that range from pandemic influenza to Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear events, and the command has redefined its readiness capabilities since Hurricane Katrina.

USNORTHCOM

In any of these scenarios, I believe Martial Law would be implemented. How else do you quarantine these situations? And, you know as well as I, NORTHCOM would be stupid to actually say the words MARTIAL LAW. They do not want to announce the true intentions of their statements. That would completely send folks into a panic. And since most of this country doesn't read this site, they are not too familiar with the potential of what may happen. Hence, Ignorance. Statements have to be sugar coated in order to make things sound good.

reply to post by palehorse23


For a forum like this, yes I think it's a reasonable assumption to make given the context of this site. I just wanted to clear the air on the fact that it was heavily nuanced.

reply to post by dgtempe


SHRILLERY KLINTOON is a LOT more viscious to her guards and other underlings--harsh, curses at them regularly, just plain mean. Also ruthlessly power mongering.

I think anyone in the White House will be heavily controlled globalists.

But at least W is kind to the low ranking folks around him. Says a lot about his character vs hers.

It's coming.

The signs are everywhere.

Help those around you that are clueless. They are most worthy of your help when TSHTF.

Any group of people that chooses to use Bush as their figure-head is a bunch of idiots. The people who run this country - are not idiots.

Bush has done his job. He's made the entire world hate him (and the republican party) and makes Obama and Clinton look like angels. This was his job. He's done it considerably well with the aid of Dick Cheney.

120,000 US troops cannot quell the violence in Iraq - a country about the size of Texas. How would our government contain 300,000,000 people in a country the size of the US?

If they wanted to start taking away our guns, now would be the time to do it - the recession has only hit certain states thus far. If you wanted to disarm the people, you'd start with the places which have been hit the hardest financially. As the recession spreads you would follow it's path, claiming that it's the interest of national security to disarm people.

Neither Clinton nor Obama are the answer to our problems. With the candidates that are left, we need a ticket of Gravel vs. Paul... otherwise it's the same ol' BS in a different package.

WTF - our governments ready for disasters? Conspiracy.

Originally posted by Shar
reply to post by dgtempe

 

You know what is weird. Your afraid of Bush and his people and I’m afraid of Clintons and their people.

You know, I think both groups are pretty scary. What do you think martial law would look like in the US? Do you think it'll just be seizing guns, or do you think they'll take stored food as well. Do you really think they're going to evacuate people to camps for non-health related reasons?

I think martial law will be very scary. I think the military will have the guns and be in uniform. I n control so to speak. They will be you’re judge, jury, and executioner. I think we will be put into groups when the chaos has settle down some. We will be given rations of what they want us to have. We will no longer be a free country. We will no longer be able to voice our opinions. The times ahead are very, very scary indeed.
Even typing this and voicing my opinion here can mean trouble.

as well as organizing new headquarters and units that are specifically tailored for domestic response

From the Web Site
United States Northern Command

Thats the really scary part. Its one thing to use Reserve troops and such (not that thats even close to Ok) but to actually be training spefic troops tailored for domestic reponse.....SCARY!!

there are pre-identified active-duty and Reserve components (4,000 members each) on a short string to provide additional muscle to initial response teams.

I'd hate to be one of these lackeys on a short string.

Jeeze, people, I've been saying this enough. Martial law cannot be declared a second time. We are under martial law. Ever hear of General Orders 100? It was in 1863, so many here may not remember.

www.yale.edu...

Wikipedia states:

Through land reclamation and municipal annexation, Boston has expanded beyond the peninsula. With many colleges and universities within the city and surrounding area, Boston is a center of higher education[9] and a center for health care. The city's economy is also based on research, finance, and technology — principally biotechnology. Boston has been experiencing gentrification and has one of the highest costs of living in the United States.[10

en.wikipedia.org...

Hum, land reclamation?
Biotechnology?
Separation from the average person through the highest cost of living?

Wikipedia on Biotechnology:

Before 1971, the term, biotechnology, was primarily used in the food processing and agriculture industries. Since the 1970s, it began to be used by the Western scientific establishment to refer to laboratory-based techniques being developed in biological research, such as recombinant DNA or tissue culture-based processes, or horizontal gene transfer in living plants, using vectors such as the Agrobacterium bacteria to transfer DNA into a host organism. In fact, the term should be used in a much broader sense to describe the whole range of methods, both ancient and modern, used to manipulate organic materials to reach the demands of food production. So the term could be defined as, "The application of indigenous and/or scientific knowledge to the management of (parts of) microorganisms, or of cells and tissues of higher organisms, so that these supply goods and services of use to the food industry and its consumers

en.wikipedia.org...

Hum, Agrobacterium transfered to host organism?
Recombiant DNA or tissue culture based processes?

I would guess that the reason they start with Boston would be because they want to protect their laboratory work as well as the fact that Boston has been notorious for being in the heat of American conflicts. If Martial law is imposed the first thing they will want to protect will be the labs where they invent the franken foods. If History repeats itself, Boston is where it all begins.

I'm glad to see this discussion. I'm also glad to see that so many ATS members are capable of discerning fact from fiction. We are a nation in decline, and there are political factors in play that need to be looked at carefully.