It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by browha
You wanna try climb 75 km of the Brecon Beacons in full combat + 100 something lbs on your back?
They spend a month pretty much doing this endurance solid. By the time you get to the final step you are too tired to take much of a step.
Originally posted by browha
A month where you go several days without sleep at a time, constantly hiking with 3-8 stone bergens, climbing extremely dangerous mountains....
How about this, if you think it is so easy, put in a request to try out for British SAS Selection. Then tell me what you think. I hear the summer selection course is easier than the Janurary selection course.
Originally posted by browha
He's a sailor! You know what they say about sailors in Britian
Originally posted by Apollyon
Originally posted by browha
A month where you go several days without sleep at a time, constantly hiking with 3-8 stone bergens, climbing extremely dangerous mountains....
How about this, if you think it is so easy, put in a request to try out for British SAS Selection. Then tell me what you think. I hear the summer selection course is easier than the Janurary selection course.
Try to get into force recon or Buds less than 1% of those tested pass for force recon and just to take the test you have to be a 1st class PFT (phyiscal fitness test) and a rifle expert.
Originally posted by browha
If you read carefully, I actually agreed before you stepped in that it was inappropiate to compare because SAS/SBS is more endurance, and US SF is more physical power....
How do you intend to prove that?
The SAS Selection course is based upon their first ever mission, where misdrops left 66 (or so) men 75 km from their RV without any decent equipment.... made them walk that in the desert heat etc....
only 22 made the RV
Originally posted by browha
I cant prove it, but someone else came out with the comment.. I do have a source which agrees with it, which I am finding.
This source being one of your SAS "friends," right? I don't supposed you have ever actually talked to any of the American SF guys about what they do?
Did you read Haney's book about Delta? That might open your eyes a little.
As to the first SAS mission, I know for a fact it's true, I'll try to find something online for it, but if nede be I can type out froma book
Originally posted by browha
That is true
I was quite happy to leave it as it was until Cool Hand came along and started writing stuff... and Skadi too.
Originally posted by browha
I had agreed with Zedd that a comparison was pointless... Then you and Skadi stepped in and made me re-kindle the argument.
Originally posted by browha
Because I had an opinion, and after a debate, my viewpoint changed.
Read the thread before you post.
I actually researched all of your postings in a effort to try to figure you out. Nowhere did I see the ones that you alluded to.
Am I to assume that your opinion changed to pro SAS after the debate, seeing as how your viewpoint changed?
and stop picking up fag ends.
What the heck is that supposed to mean?
[Edited on 25-2-2004 by browha]