It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

House Passes "Thought Crime" Prevention Bill

page: 10
62
<< 7  8  9    11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 23 2007 @ 06:04 AM
link   
reply to post by Bushwacked
 


Ouch,... your stinging sarcasm has woken me from my slumber.

But alas I have woken again to realize that it was a dream within a dream

This bill does not trump the Bill of Rights.

However, in a world of "Hegelian Dialectic" paradigms, reactions to state imposed problems serve a specific agenda.

...be careful to the direction in which you are being herded !

The only thing worse than a sheep-like mentality is a sheepdog-like mentality

The same forces that have been implemented to overthrow foreign governments have been implemented domestically ever since 1492



posted on Nov, 23 2007 @ 07:48 PM
link   
You know why they're passing these laws, don't you? It is because they feel threatened, and wish to hold on to their positions. Look at how GB turned around and said we're not having elections for at least 2 years - what is GWB going to do? Say he needs to stay in office due to a threat?



posted on Nov, 24 2007 @ 10:53 AM
link   
perhaps the reason they are doing all this is in preperation for the next depression. Its obvious to any and all that the dollar is crashing, and the american economy is soon to follow. During times like that, protest, violent and nonviolent, awaken all over the country. In a rational viewing you could imagine that all the new tracking systems (rfid and such) combined with limitations on our rights, destruction of our privacy (free wiretapping), destrucion of the bill of rights, and construction of huge new detention facilitys may indeed be control systems being inacted by the government to maintain control in the forthcoming economic collapse. Just a nice thought i wanted to share with you all.



posted on Nov, 24 2007 @ 10:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by RedGolem
So the leader of what ever group preaching hate or something else could be committing a crime.


Then Fox News is in severe trouble. But I dont know, maybe its OK when it comes to hating the next US war target...



[edit on 24-11-2007 by Copernicus]



posted on Nov, 24 2007 @ 11:50 AM
link   
Can't really say that bush is a complete idiot...I mean, the New Agenda is happening...and it's not really new anymore...as far as I'm concerned...we've been living it for a long time now...he's accomplished alot...in a negative manner.
But thought crime? I watched something on the sci-fi channel about thought crimes not too long ago...was it star trek?
Makes you think...they might be getting in your head right now for all you know.

...there's too much going on for something not to happen here soon...Yeah, if we AmeriKans don't do something, sure we're screwed..I wish I had a killswitch for politic-(ian)s...but the thing is...we will do something when the time comes. What's that song... "Don't worry, be happy"
I'm not gonna say violence against violence won't work..but, victory by numbers is what makes us so much bigger...Public uses the constitution, the elite stand over-top of it...constitution=nothing of importance...especially nowadays...I mean, it's ripped and torn every day with new amendments and laws. Your best bet would be to direct your focus on change. It's a game of follow the leader then assimilate the leader

The crazy thing is, the public are the ones with full control.always have been...making people AWARE is KEY..gathering them together to drown an establishment...ugh
The internets a good way to get word around...find the right places...

Tis a world of choice meets destiny...

Sorry for the blabbing and flip-floppiness



posted on Nov, 24 2007 @ 08:04 PM
link   
Doesn't this section of the act

“(3) Ideologically-based violence.—The term ‘ideologically-based violence’ means the use, planned use, or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual to promote the group or individual’s political, religious, or social beliefs.

Make the federal government in violation of HR 1955?

Doesn't the fed gov use force and a threat of violence to promote the groups political and social beleifs?

Very scary - I would like to also ask the question - What are our sworn representatives thinking? And to repeat a common question - Is it time yet?



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 03:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by bassman2
Very scary - I would like to also ask the question - What are our sworn representatives thinking? And to repeat a common question - Is it time yet?


I think that when we start asking questions like that, we need to just do something. By virtue of asking the question, we make it apparent that we're pushed too far. However, we never step forward and DO anything; we quietly acquiesce, which is exactly what those at the top want us to do.

So, to answer your question, it's been time for a long time now. They all need to be removed, and corporate interest needs taken out of the political picture. When that happens, we'll be set. Let me know if you come up with a nonviolent means to do this, will ya please?

TheBorg



posted on Nov, 30 2007 @ 10:35 PM
link   
reply to post by johnsky
 




Hey, I like that plan!

Ruin their efforts through acts of incompetence!

Clog up the wheels of their machines with out lazy, drunk bodies!



posted on Nov, 30 2007 @ 10:53 PM
link   
I am very concerned about what is happening in this country and the world. The NWO is not a crackpot conspiracy when world leaders admit it openly and tout it as a legitimate political agenda. It is most certainly happening, to deny it is pure ignorance.

Please click on my "constitution" link in signature.

Many of you may have visited already, thank you.



posted on Nov, 30 2007 @ 11:12 PM
link   
My best advice:

move to another country .....
while you still can

cuz the US of A ain't great anymore



posted on Nov, 30 2007 @ 11:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Zeta115
My best advice:

move to another country .....
while you still can

cuz the US of A ain't great anymore


Never. I'll go "Red Dawn" on their ass first. It's MY country too. Not just theirs.



posted on Nov, 30 2007 @ 11:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Griff
Never. I'll go "Red Dawn" on their ass first. It's MY country too. Not just theirs.

Griff, I applaud your patriotism however, Red Dawn only works in the
movie. With the US military technology now. You would be found
in a couple hours at most. "Go Wolverines"



posted on Nov, 30 2007 @ 11:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Zeta115
 



Although I agree. At least i'd know I died trying. Not just rolling over and taking it. No offense.



posted on Nov, 30 2007 @ 11:54 PM
link   
warning
The term "going Red Dawn" is now known to be subversive. You will be overrun by nanobots in 3...2...
ooopoop!

[edit on 30-11-2007 by jackinthebox]



posted on Nov, 30 2007 @ 11:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Griff
 

no offense taken

but sometimes it might be best to do what MacArthur did
in a strategic retreat .....
"I shall return"



posted on Nov, 30 2007 @ 11:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by jackinthebox
warning
The term "going Red Dawn" is now known to be subversive. You will be overrun by nanobots in 3...2...


This is interesting to think about. Because you're right. We could probably add "going postal". When does it end.

I'm so glad I know how to live off the land.



posted on Nov, 30 2007 @ 11:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Zeta115
 


Point taken.




posted on Nov, 30 2007 @ 11:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Zeta115
 


Retreat where? Some cave in Afghanistan?




posted on Dec, 1 2007 @ 12:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by Zeta115
 

Retreat where? Some cave in Afghanistan?

Nope, Canada !!!!
Hey it worked for the draft dodgers .....
it can work for the tyranny dodgers as well ....



posted on Dec, 1 2007 @ 12:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by jackinthebox
Retreat where?


Nice that you bring this up. Especially when they are thinking of fencing us in. Is it a fence to keep "illegals" out? Or is it a fence to keep us in?


Bush signs law to build fence at US-Mexico border


en.wikinews.org...



new topics

top topics



 
62
<< 7  8  9    11 >>

log in

join