So let me get this right..
"God" created a massive "place" for a few "people" crawling around on one tiny planet in one tiny star system in one ordinary galaxy in one
possible universe? And the lesson is to teach them... hmm... "love?"
Is this really what you think? Slam the book shut and case closed right!
All of this real estate of "reality" and it's all for us. God knows us all by name and sits on his thrown, stroking his long white beard, just
waiting for us to become morally enlightened so we can join him.
Sounds very hmm.. comforting to me. It also sounds a bit egotistical. It sounds like people are having trouble reconciling the immense nature of
reality so they think the most comforthing thing. Have it revolve around me me me!
Yet some logic sets in as they look around and notice the other 7 billion of us. So they accept that we are all in the same predicament and therefore
it's not just about them, but about us.
Remember God is just waiting in an eternal paradise for you to morally reform yourself and you can join him watching paint dry!
As for the OP's topic..
I think it is highly unlikely that we are "the only ones." Check the data. The fact that we haven't detected radio signals or seen the president
shake hands with a little green man doesn't mean anything but:
1) We haven't detected ET radiowaves.
2) The president has not shaken hands with a small green man.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's look at the data:
1) We have just come into an age of new technology and enlightenment within the last several decades.
So what about Seth Shostak and the SETI clan? Well lucky for them, MS co-founder Paul Allen is paying for 1/2 the price tag for a new telescope
devoted full time to ET searching.
The first mission for the Allen Telescope Array will be to scan several billion stars across a vast swath of our own Milky Way galaxy, said astronomer
Seth Shostak, of the SETI Institute in Mountain View, Calif. That broad-brush survey will be followed in the coming years by detailed examinations of
a million stars — a quantum leap in coverage of celestial real estate. In the 45 years since scientists first started looking for signals from alien
worlds, only about 750 stars have gotten such close scrutiny.
Source
In other words, while I highly respect their endeavors, they are openly telling us that they have barely scratched the surface as far as one possible
avenue (in locating intelligent life) is concerned.
Considering how immense cosmic timescales are, I feel that finding others like us is very unlikely. ET would (from an evolution standpoint) mostly
likely be far ahead of us or far behind us. Or perhaps just much different than us as others have suggested.
2) If your opinion is neutral on UFOs and you watch a couple television shows on the history channel, your opinion is unlikely to shift. They are
often interesting but have a predermined goal in mind. The goal being to perpetuate the mystery. Mysteries are one of the greatest gifts in life and
I don't blame them for using this particular mystery for ratings. Still, let's take a closer look..
I.E.> Remember the Peter Jennings UFO special "Seeing Is Believing?" A lot of good information was given including Project Blue Book, J. Allen
Hynek's work, compitent accounts of sightings & abductions etc. So far so good right? Not entirely.
When they got into the abduction part of the program they eliminated all the material from the foremost abduction researcher Dr. David M. Jacobs. In
fact Dr. Jacobs is the only person who teachers the only university level course on UFOs in the US of A. So why ignore his work? Instead they
brought in other high profile psychologists who refuted abductions as imaginative people with false memories or people who experience sleep paralysis.
Dr. Jacobs has data that would refute the sleep paralysis explanation and has studied the phenomenon longer than these other psychologists and
researchers. Yet none of his material ended up in the final production. Why?
The answer to the why is simply because (as previously stated) they aren't trying to solve the UFO problem. They are trying to get ratings. The
content isn't as important as the ratings. So you see where I am going with this?
My opinion is that a certain number of UFO sightings are of ET origin. Can I give you coordinates of where the cloaked ship is in our upper
atmosphere? No. Can I introduce you to my "space friend?" No. That is exactly the point. If ET's are just mold growing under some rock on a
distant sphere then how would looking for radiowaves help?
Likewise, if UFOs are real and represent the upperlimits of what can be acheived in this physical reality then how do we study them? Would be akin to
someone from the dark ages trying to study a plasma tv.
I believe in mankind. I've seen the brilliance that we are capable of. But theres little hope of anyone from the dark ages figuring out a plasma
tv. And there's even less hope when the majority of the population is more interested in their individual everyday life then figuring out the
mysteries of the plasma tv. Our culture is one of individual competing egos trying to survive. Our culture is one where people with money survive
and garner individual respect from others. Our culture is not centered around discovering UFOs, dark matter, or anything else of that nature. Sure
some people make a living out of it. But go down to an average busy city block and ask people on the street who Hugh Hefner is. I bet everyone
knows. Then ask them who J. Allen Hynek is. I bet very few if any will know. That is the difference.
I can assure you, any intelligence operating those saucers isn't like us. They are unified in whatever their agenda is. We are not.