It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by subz
OK, this isn't a hard concept. We're not talking about smudges or blobs that look like dogs with rabbit ears if you squint your eye and look on a Tuesday. I've made a quick example image of you peoples favourite comparison of clouds being mirrored and I've added a random geometric shape mirrored and put them next to the only effect I consider to be probable that its occurance is not accidental.
If you can sit there and compare the cloud and the random shape to the image we are referring to as a 'Knight' please do so! Then at least I can stop wasting my time replying to such close minded persons.
Originally posted by subz
OK, this isn't a hard concept. We're not talking about smudges or blobs that look like dogs with rabbit ears if you squint your eye and look on a Tuesday. I've made a quick example image of you peoples favourite comparison of clouds being mirrored and I've added a random geometric shape mirrored and put them next to the only effect I consider to be probable that its occurance is not accidental.
If you can sit there and compare the cloud and the random shape to the image we are referring to as a 'Knight' please do so! Then at least I can stop wasting my time replying to such close minded persons.
Originally posted by Spidersnarf
Hi all, I was following this thread since yesterday with much interest.
But I have downloaded a Mona Lisa and a Da Vinci Self portrait and tried to do the same stuff as with the Last Supper; check what I came up with:
*** PICS removed to shrink quote ***
I don't think he did it by coincidence......
He did it with more of his paintings. Yes he was a Master, he knew some of the secret teachings ........
Just incredible. no??
I guess I must be missing something. What's so incredible about the pics you altered? What hidden objects & messages do you see in them?
Originally posted by Grailkeeper
He would have to have to do at least two 'identical' paintings in order to get it correct.
If this is factual, why haven't any duplicate paintings by Davinci been uncovered? ( by duplicate I mean actually painted by him ).
Originally posted by Grailkeeper
He would have to have to do at least two 'identical' paintings in order to get it correct.
If this is factual, why haven't any duplicate paintings by Davinci been uncovered? ( by duplicate I mean actually painted by him ).