reply to post by Outrageo
Outrageo,I have no desire to u2u you any more info than I have given you at this point,if you had spent simply an hour watching the craft being built
and the technology being explained and listened to David Hamel you would stop playing the piper in this little drama.
Research it yourself,become involved of your own free will,follow your own path,OR DONT.
Its your choice,but if you hope to in any way debunk or challenge my assertation,THEN LETS GET IT ON.
You know my claims are bold.So do I.
I clearly say that THE PROBES AND HAMELS CRAFT ARE THE SAME TECHNOLOGY---PERIOD---ADINFINITUM.
Go learn more Outrageo,I learned more in one lousey hour than you seem to know or are willing to share.
Hamel has a multi-decade ,documented,chronological history of research and developement of this technology.
His explanations and interpretations can be understood by anyone with an open mind and the time to listen.
Hamels,craft and theories PREDATE any probe pictorial or video evidence.
The existence of Hamels craft and tech,----PRECLUDES----the possibility of the probes being a hoax,it would not be possible to duplicate the probes
performance or physical design---thirty years before the pictures and videos were created or recorded!!!
If you simply research as I say you cant help but get it,and you need to choose to do this,it is that important,I wont do any more for anyone on this
point,do it of your own free will or DONT DO IT---THERE WILL BE NO EXCUSES ONCE THE REALITY HITS YOU IF IT HITS YOU OF YOUR OWN FREE WILL.
There is no way to wiggle out of this one,you cant deny my assertation until YOU go out and learn enough to do so,I say the tech is the same for many
reasons possibly not known to yourself,now for gods sake go out and learn enough to engage me on a level playing field---OR SIMPLY AQUIESESS to me
that what I claim is true and proven.
I feel the intent of your supportive tone is not virtuous,Outrageo.I do not require supporters or comrades in arms as well intended as they may be I
am more concerned that you yourself go become informed enough to engage me here so we can teach others through our discourse.
I see you are already involved and engaged,lets play good cop bad cop,now go learn enough to tell me why Hamel needed the granite sphere that was
located at the lowest level of his craft,ok?
When you can bring me that bone I will show you a part or a piece of the probe that is undeniably an intrinsic component of Hamels anti-grvity craft
design.
And stop whining about me ruffling your feathers,you have been engaged,this isnt going away,reaching out for your fellow debunkers wont help on this
one.
The burden of proof is on you not me,SURPRISE,why did you think I needed to provide any more proof than my assertation provides??
Based on the weight of all four hundred plus pages of discussion you claim as your ally??
Nice try pal,forget every page until you read mine,ITS NOT THE WAY IT WAS ,ITS THE WAY IT IS.
As I said,challenge Hamel and I or find somewhere else to create discourse.
I am not going anywhere any more than Hamels history is going anywhere,you are out of your league here,and your supportive cast of characters will not
help this time.
I might add that I also was abducted as Hamel was, and many others are every year.
Like I said you are out of your league and this one isnt being buried wether I post links or not,there is no requirement for me to do so ,but there is
one for you to behave on this thread.
You need to learn so you can visualise what we are talking about,this verbal ping pong is a minefield of manipulation,go learn and work with me.
I may be unrealistic but when you said you had researched Hamel I took you at your word,I hope this isnt indicitive of the level of commitment you
display towards everything you CHOOSE TO ENGAGE IN DURING YOUR SPARE TIME.
I truly am sorry,but this is important,I wont spare you either,go learn,this one is real.
[edit on 27-7-2010 by one4all]
[edit on 28-7-2010 by one4all]