It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheShadow
reply to post by tomiuk
Being open minded also means being open to all possibilities Tomi. The problem we have with the DRT is that they are all die hard drone believers, none of which has ever even been willing to admit the possiblity the drones are a hoax. A skeptic or 2 on the DRT would do wonders for their objectivity IMO.
So I ask you this Ms Tomi, what would it take for you to believe this to be a hoax? Are your PIs being paid to be objective or only report the possiblilty that the drones are real. I mean lets be realistic the PIs are working to prove the drones real....but what if they prove they arent...are you willing to accept such findings in good faith?
Originally posted by TheShadow
reply to post by tomiuk
Being open minded also means being open to all possibilities Tomi. The problem we have with the DRT is that they are all die hard drone believers, none of which has ever even been willing to admit the possiblity the drones are a hoax. A skeptic or 2 on the DRT would do wonders for their objectivity IMO.
So I ask you this Ms Tomi, what would it take for you to believe this to be a hoax? Are your PIs being paid to be objective or only report the possiblilty that the drones are real. I mean lets be realistic the PIs are working to prove the drones real....but what if they prove they arent...are you willing to accept such findings in good faith?
Originally posted by tomiuk
If we get leads or evidence of a hoax and we confirm it, we will of course present it publicly.
Originally posted by tomiuk
Originally posted by TheShadow
reply to post by tomiuk
Being open minded also means being open to all possibilities Tomi. The problem we have with the DRT is that they are all die hard drone believers, none of which has ever even been willing to admit the possiblity the drones are a hoax. A skeptic or 2 on the DRT would do wonders for their objectivity IMO.
So I ask you this Ms Tomi, what would it take for you to believe this to be a hoax? Are your PIs being paid to be objective or only report the possiblilty that the drones are real. I mean lets be realistic the PIs are working to prove the drones real....but what if they prove they arent...are you willing to accept such findings in good faith?
The PI's are investigating all aspects of this case with no agenda in mind except solving it one way or another.
/ Re: #6 The Drone Enigma A Global Search For The Tr on: 03/04/08 at 11:23am Started by Merlin | Post by Latitude on 03/01/08 at 07:46am, DrDil wrote:
RE: “More importantly, what should we think of all those who came out so fervently against the drone case?”
Well, we could judge people for forming their own opinions based on the available evidence, or (if found to be false) we could think the same as we would of those who fervently defended it at every opportunity, that everyone makes mistakes.
Of those who continually scream fake before all the info is in, I am making a list. You can bank on it that I will be the first to make light of them for being wrong. I will never let them forget it. They have in my opinion committed the worst offense against ufology. What we have are two types. The first is simply someone who can't resist the temptation to debunk. The second is those that hold a grudge against a case for not being everything they had hoped for.
They won't be given a free pass from me. They rolled the dice. If they come up snake eyes payment must be made
Originally posted by TheShadow
Originally posted by tomiuk
If we get leads or evidence of a hoax and we confirm it, we will of course present it publicly.
I've quoted only this line because if you read it at face value it could be interpreted as follows IMO!
"If we get a lead that points to hoax we will not confirm it therefore will not need to report such findings."
Just want to double check and make sure this is not the case......ALL leads will be followed up on and reported...yes??? Not just leads that can prove the reality of the drones. Also, would the DRT be willing to allow a trusted skeptic to analyze ALL data gathered by the detectives to assure objectivity??
Originally posted by tomiuk
I never thought you, dear Reader, could be such a master baiter as well..
Patience pays when fishing for the big ones.
Originally posted by Siddharta
Originally posted by tomiuk
I never thought you, dear Reader, could be such a master baiter as well..
Patience pays when fishing for the big ones.
I guess, you meant "heretic". No, I don't have troubles with the opinions of the members of your research team. They can think, what they want. This won't make the drones become true.
Of course, I hope, that the results will be published. And I trust in the DRT, that they will do, as they did it already.
But it won't change the world at all. Maybe some of us need a new hobby than...
Even if somebody would present a model of the drones in public, there always would be people who would say: THIS is the real fake, the others where real.
Originally posted by Siddharta
Just to relax:
Here is my dedication to tomi and the DRT:
www.ijigg.com...
Originally posted by Siddharta
Just to relax:
Here is my dedication to tomi and the DRT:
www.ijigg.com...
Originally posted by Siddharta
Thanks again, guys and girl,
@tomi: Play it on a drone and it will loop forever. But I personally had hoped, that there would be an answer sometime.
@murnut: Okay, phony will be the single - but there are more to come... Maybe drony could be the one. (Not yet produced.)
@pk: Thanks again. Obviously you have done your homework. And you like humour, as I do. Namasti!
@Nemo: This excuse of LMH is ridiculous... Look at her California-drones-appeared-here-and-there-map... Come on! I know, there is a true researcher inside. Don't tell me, you just throw away that map, you surely have on your harddrive, don't you?
Okay, write more everybody! I need five more songs to finnish Reader's Views with at least ten. Need more inspiration!