It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Iranian fatwa approves use of nuclear weapons
By Colin Freeman and Philip Sherwell in Washington
Last Updated: 12:12am GMT 19/02/2006
Iran's hardline spiritual leaders have issued an unprecedented new fatwa, or holy order, sanctioning the use of atomic weapons against its enemies.
In yet another sign of Teheran's stiffening resolve on the nuclear issue, influential Muslim clerics have for the first time questioned the theocracy's traditional stance that Sharia law forbade the use of nuclear weapons.
One senior mullah has now said it is "only natural" to have nuclear bombs as a "countermeasure" against other nuclear powers, thought to be a reference to America and Israel.
The pronouncement is particularly worrying because it has come from Mohsen Gharavian, a disciple of the ultra-conservative Ayatollah Mohammad Taghi Mesbah-Yazdi, who is widely regarded as the cleric closest to Iran's new president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Iran Develops Nuclear Technologies in Secret for 18 Years
A report issued by the International Atomic Energy Agency describes technological advances and a policy of concealment.
On November 10, 2003, the International Atomic Energy Agency issued a 30-page confidential report on Iran's nuclear activities. The report, which the agency sent to its board of governors and to 20 governments, reveals that for the past 18 years Iran has secretly developed technologies for producing weapon-usable highly enriched uranium and plutonium. During that time, the report says, Iran violated its Nonproliferation Treaty obligations and falsified declarations to the agency regarding safeguards required under the treaty.
Originally posted by Id123
That may well be why the west is worried so much. Dont they have rights aswell though?
Originally posted by Muaddib
This is a perfect example of the ignorance on the events that have been happening in the Middle East since the 7th century AD.
Islamic extremism has existed for over a millenium before the U.S., Palestine, or Israel existed as nations... and actually Palestine is no nation, because they didn't accept to become a nation if Israel was also seen as a nation.
Do yourself a favour and read on the history of the wars and battles which have been waged as "jihads" since the 7th century and are still ongoing today...
Originally posted by Muaddib
Except for the fact that Iran has called for the destruction of Israel almost every week for years now.
I still can't believe there are people who want to back a radical Islamic country after all the threats, suicide bombing campaigns and attacks such radical countries have made...
New York - The Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, stated in a speech on Sunday that last summer’s Lebanon war showed “for the first time hegemony of the occupier regime ( Israel) collapsed and that pushed the button counting the days until the destruction of Zionist regime.” Ahmadinejad’s comments, which were broadcast to the Iranian nation in a speech marking the 18th anniversary of the death of its Islamist founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, also included this threat: “I warn the Zionist regime and its protectors, if you want to launch a new war against the Lebanese people, this time the people’s ocean of anger will become stormy and will carry away your decayed roots from this region ... The countdown to this regime’s destruction started through the hands of Hizballah’s children ... We will witness the destruction of this regime in the near future thanks to the endeavors of all Palestinian and Lebanese fighters” ( Sydney Morning Herald , June 4).
Originally posted by Karl7772000
I might not be as knowledgeable as many of the other people here in this forum, but I have to throw in my 2 cents (really a question). Is Israel capable of launching a nuke at Iran's nuclear sites or are their missile distance to short - range?
I may get a warning on this short answer but....... Submarines
Originally posted by Muaddib
BTW, not all Palestinian Arabs agree with the radicals, just as not all Israelites agree with the rest of the population. Giving examples of a few Israelites groups is no way to prove your point. There are extremists in both sides.
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
..........
If as you say both are guilty, then both should be treated equally...or did you mean that Palestine was just slightly more guiltier? or perhaps an Israeli life was worth slightly more on the human life exchange then a Palestinian life?
Originally posted by Id123
To thepieman, Well even if your answers short it correct. Submarines def going to have the range! Dolphin class I belive, Nuclear capable types
Dolphin Class - Type 800 coastal submarines
INS Dolphin (1999)
INS Leviathan (1999)
INS Tekumah (Revival, 2000)
On August 25, 2006, Israel signed a deal with Germany to purchase two nuclear-capable Dolphin class submarines, a deal valued at $1.3 billion, with Germany financing one-third of the total cost. [1]
Originally posted by demorior
Israel, while never officially acknowledging that it possesses nuclear weapons, is estimated to have had nuclear bombs sense the late 1960's. This means that during the 6 Day War, the Yom Kippur War, as well as other engagments sense the 60's, Israel has had the option to use nuclear weapons, and has chosen not to do so. This despite the fact that some of those wars weren't going well at certain points, such as the start of the Yom Kippur War. I think this shows that Israel is responsible enough to possess nuclear weapons and they aren't going to use them.