It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Killtown Explains Why They Didn't Crash Planes into the WTC

page: 5
0
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 10:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Zaphod58
Chunk of fuselage (the square windows):



Huh..... Where is the location of this picture?

I have seen it before but it looks like it's on a roof top?



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 10:34 PM
link   
Then what's your explanation for all that falling out the other side of the tower? Let me guess, bits of the tower that were thrown out by the explosion. And all the plane debris was planted on the ground.



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 10:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by selfless

Originally posted by Zaphod58
Chunk of fuselage (the square windows):



Huh..... Where is the location of this picture?

I have seen it before but it looks like it's on a roof top?


It landed on top of WTC 5 after being blown out of the tower.



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 10:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Zaphod58
Then what's your explanation for all that falling out the other side of the tower? Let me guess, bits of the tower that were thrown out by the explosion. And all the plane debris was planted on the ground.


That's one possibility.

But like i told you, I have seen a video of a person who was on the ground around the towers for a whole 1 hour with a video camera before the towers blew up.

I did not see any debris of the planes in that full hour around the buildings.



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 10:37 PM
link   
Because some of it was found SEVEN BLOCKS from the WTC. The planes were traveling at close to top speed at impact. It's called INERTIA. The parts that exit the building are going to STILL be traveling at a high rate of speed, and they're going to go a long way after.



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 10:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by Zaphod58

Originally posted by selfless

Originally posted by Zaphod58
Chunk of fuselage (the square windows):



Huh..... Where is the location of this picture?

I have seen it before but it looks like it's on a roof top?


It landed on top of WTC 5 after being blown out of the tower.



Well now, that explains it all does it?...

I don't believe for a second that pieces of the planes that big landed on a building bellow and we don't even see it on the videos.

Sorry, that's just my subjective opinion...



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 10:39 PM
link   
Just going back to the wreckage in the tower discussion for a moment. These core columns are what I beleived trapped and halted the majority of it.




posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 10:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Zaphod58
Because some of it was found SEVEN BLOCKS from the WTC. The planes were traveling at close to top speed at impact. It's called INERTIA. The parts that exit the building are going to STILL be traveling at a high rate of speed, and they're going to go a long way after.


Ok so, where are the debris in the photo's you showed me in the videos?

I don't see them.



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 10:44 PM
link   
My bad.

[edit on 6-6-2007 by selfless]



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 10:50 PM
link   
No selfless my friend, I said core columns. The facades have a different size and shape.



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 10:50 PM
link   
No selfless my friend, I said core columns. The facades have a different size and shape.



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 10:51 PM
link   


Am i supposed to believe that the top wing on the back of the plane should have penetrated the steel columns? Not to mention the horizontal floors.



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 10:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by SteveR
No selfless my friend, I said core columns. The facades have a different size and shape.


My bad.

I thought they looked too big to be frontal facades.



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 10:56 PM
link   
By the time the elevators and vertical fin got to the facade, there was already a HUGE hole in the building for them to enter. Or do you think that the hole would somehow seal up behind each part of the plane as it went it?

[edit on 6/6/2007 by Zaphod58]



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 11:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by Zaphod58
By the time the elevators and vertical fin got to the facade, there was already a HUGE hole in the building for them to enter. Or do you think that the hole would somehow seal up behind each part of the plane as it went it?

[edit on 6/6/2007 by Zaphod58]


Hmmm...

By the way thanks for teaching me a new English word, I never knew how the vertical fins were called.

My point was that the vertical fins are the highest part of the plane and for it to penetrate a hole in the building it would have to create an independent hole from the vertical fins them selves.

If you make a hole in a wall to walk through and you don't make it high enough to fit your head, you're gonna hit your head by trying to walk into the hole.



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 11:13 PM
link   


How did two 767's 100% penetrate through this?



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 11:18 PM
link   
What is the length between the center core and the cosmetic facades?

Is it long enough to fit a whole 767?

I will look for old WTC construction pictures.

[edit on 6-6-2007 by selfless]



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 11:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Killtown


How did two 767's 100% penetrate through this?



It seems you think these are the facades too. Oh dear..



posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 11:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by selfless
What is the length between the center core and the cosmetic facades?

Is it long enough to fit a whole 767?


Hmmm, I'm gonna have to go with a no on this one...




posted on Jun, 6 2007 @ 11:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by SteveR

Originally posted by Killtown

How did two 767's 100% penetrate through this?

It seems you think these are the facades too. Oh dear..

What are they Mr. Immature?



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join