It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
Though socialism has an inherant control issue (regulation of the economy, media, and government) that control issue can be used for the people by the people (democratic socialism anyone?) Socialisms dedication is to the welfare of the people and profits be damned, Capitalisms dedication is to the accumulation of profits and the people be damned. Id rather throw my chips in with a government that aims to make life better, than one that aims to make itself better.
Next we have the problem of 4th parties trying to get in, China, Europe, etc. The world will be looking at us and be forwarned that they could try and slash us while we are weak and take over during the chaos! So you must be able to maintain a two front war at all times. Hard? Oh yeah. Impossible? No, so long as you stay on your toes and know what your up against. Know Thyself and thy enemy. Read up on Sun Tzu.
Originally posted by grover
Both parties are responsible for this and their failures to address on a meaningful level the issues in front of us have sealed our fate.
Originally posted by Kelldor
Waco and Ruby Ridge did a lot to put the fear of government into people. This of course is all speculative.
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
And it can be argued that that is sort of the system that China is heading towards. While we are quick to label China as "communist," a cursory glance of China shows that they are not the typical communist/socialist state. They actually seem to be trying to mix communism with a form of democracy and it almost seems to be working for them.
Originally posted by dawnstar
I really think that "we the people" have played a role in this.
The deeper it goes
Middle class barely treads water
By Christine Dugas, USA TODAY
Millions of middle-class families can no longer afford to live on two incomes.
A generation ago, a typical American middle-class family lived on the income of a single breadwinner. In recent years it has taken two working spouses to live the modern middle-class dream. Now, it seems even that is not enough to survive the skyrocketing cost of housing, health care and college while saving for retirement and shouldering growing debt loads.
Bill and Terry Will of Chesapeake, Va., together earn about $70,000 a year, and yet it's a struggle to provide for their family and pay off their credit card debt. Terry, 44, is a nurse and Bill, 50, manages a warehouse that ships food and supplies to other countries.
The Economics of being single
Thanks for writing. To all those who may be delaying marriage so they can achieve financial stability, I would remind them that two can live more economically than one. A newly married couple paying for one apartment, can make their money go further than two singles, both working, renting two. There's a pragmatic reason to marry.
Also, it's been shown that married men earn more, on average, than single men do. I know from personal experience that our financial picture improved after we got married, probably due in part to the fact that as we've gotten older and more experienced, we're able to earn more. And those higher earnings started around the time we started having children.
Originally posted by calcoastseeker
Don't confuse democracy with capitalism. China is still very much a Maoist communist country,what they have adopted to survive and compete and defeat the western countries is capitalism.They are allowing private enterprise but believe me they are only allowing certain controlled freedoms.
Once they have destroyed all the democratic/capitalist countries be assured reforms will take place.This is what we get by allowing for the last forty years their children to come here, receive and education, and then take that knowledge back and use it against us.
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
And it can be argued that that is sort of the system that China is heading towards. While we are quick to label China as "communist," a cursory glance of China shows that they are not the typical communist/socialist state. They actually seem to be trying to mix communism with a form of democracy and it almost seems to be working for them.
We must be looking at a different china. Maybe your confusing Democratic reforms with free market reforms? Because belive me, the two do not go hand in hand. IMO, China has very little deomcracy, both political and economical, but it certainly is sliding down the slippery slope of free market capitalism. Theres already a depressed reserve army of labour, little occupational saftey laws, little to no child labour laws, little to no environmental protection laws. No, i dont see china becomming a democratic socialist country, but i sure do see it becomming a free market paradise much like Nicaragua, Chile, Mozambique, Angola, Ziaere, or Grenada.
Originally posted by calcoastseeker
Yes, and what is not discussed in the media is that the majority of the factories in China are fronts for the Peoples Liberation Army.They are using slave labor to cheaply make the products.These products are exported to be sold in the western world mostly at Walmart. ALL profit that these factories make is used in the manufacture and development of their,planes,ships,missiles,guns,etc. Which they will eventually use on us.
You're paying for your children's destruction. Free market capitalism what a great western concept.