It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
LONDON — Iranian state television showed video footage Wednesday of a British servicewoman and a group of seized British sailors and marines.
The video showed the sailors and marines eating. The woman, 26-year-old Faye Turney, was shown wearing a white tunic and with a black headscarf draped loosely over her hair.
"Obviously we trespassed," the woman said on the footage broadcast by Al-Alam, an Arabic-language, Iranian state-run television station that is carried across the Middle East by satellite
Originally posted by JENJESLIS
Think it was a forced confession?
www.foxnews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by JENJESLIS
I agree, I just don't see anything good coming out of this. But, if they are forcing it, why would they let the girl go tomorrow? She would testify that they forced a confession. Or would it not matter cause they would deny it? Maybe they won't release her. I don't know, either way it will be interesting what happens after this......
Originally posted by Crakeur
isn't it against some UN mandate that prisoners are not to be paraded around on tv?
Originally posted by Crakeur
isn't it against some UN mandate that prisoners are not to be paraded around on tv?
Originally posted by bluesquareapple
It's already known that by torturing someone that you can get them to say what you want. She thinks they will get tortured, so she says what they want, they have no use for her now, so they release her..
Originally posted by JENJESLIS
But, if they are forcing it, why would they let the girl go tomorrow? She would testify that they forced a confession. Or would it not matter cause they would deny it?
Originally posted by Ste2652
Well, the last time they did this part of the conditions of the release of the British personnel in 2004 was that they would confess on Iranian television. They did so and were released.
Well, the last time they did this part of the conditions of the release of the British personnel in 2004 was that they would confess on Iranian television. They did so and were released.
Originally posted by infinite
Originally posted by bluesquareapple
It's already known that by torturing someone that you can get them to say what you want. She thinks they will get tortured, so she says what they want, they have no use for her now, so they release her..
Iran wouldn't torture a women because of there would be an international outcry over it.
Originally posted by ImpliedChaos
well just because they forced them to say doesnt mean it isn't true. just an idea
Originally posted by bodrul
they wouldnt torture anyone of them
Originally posted by ImpliedChaos
of course they are gonna say if was forced and that they weren't doing anything wrong, when they are back on british soil. what else would they say whether they are telling the truth,lying, or the really didnt know what the hell the were doing.