It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jra
I do not believe that their is any mining operations taking place on the Moon, so I guess according to you i'm, "stuck in mainstream thought", what ever that means exactly.
I also don't see what supposed images of Lunar mining equipment has to do with Hubble being used as a spy satellite. Besides being similar, unrealistic pieces of fiction that is.
Originally posted by Dallas
Knapp's tour through Los Alamos with Lazar and taking video while they toured.
Originally posted by Dallas
Well Masisoar, Los Alamos hasn't been the model for security acuteness, It's been a security disaster.
Knapp's aired the video taken by his cameraman during the tour whole or impart I don't know. If memory serves Lazar took them through on an off-day, a Sunday I think.
Surely, due to locked labs and need to know access, he may not have taken Knapp to the more highly secured areas there. But I think he did take them to the lab he had access to. Something might be on the web about, or you might email Knapp. Knapp explains how they got in..basically through a door where there wasn't any security.
Dallas
Originally posted by Darkprime
You can tour a lot of a national lab with an escort (someone who's cleared to go where they take you) and any appropriate level of identification. Also, not all parts of the labs are classified. I don't know about the tour he went on, but he probably was only in the unclassified parts of the lab.
Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by jra
It makes no sense to me to have the Hubble or a possible twin being used for spying on people when there are already a number of spy satellites out there specifically designed for the job. I really don't think a deep imaging telescope would work well as a spy satellite, nor do I believe that a spy satellite would work well as a deep imaging telescope.
To properly address your post jra I would need to know what your opinion is of the mining equipment found in Copernicus and the artifacts found on the far side in AS8-12-2209 and LO1-102 presented on the "John Lear's Moon Photo's" thread. In other words do you see any possilbity that there is a mining operation taking place in Copernicus or are those artifacts just tricks of light and shadow? This will give me an indication of whether or not you are 'stuck' in mainstream thought. Thanks.
Hi Gazrock,
As you may know Tom Mahood did a major study of Bob and probably debunked every point that you made above. In addition Edward Teller disclaimed any knowledge of Lazar in a video before Teller died.
If you watch the recent history channel UFO and aliens documentaries, Lazar makes a astonishing claim:
He say that 'nothing is wasted. No energy or power is not used by some other process in the ship. It's incredibly efficient, he says. All the systems were connected to each other.' (paraphrasing).
Now this claim is something that he would not have been able to know or see unless the craft was fully powered up, and he was able to do an experiment to show that power was being internally re-used. If no energy is wasted in the system it would be essentially a black box and totally closed to any analysis.
Lazar is remarkably consistent with his stories, but this comment is new.. He looks as though he's older in this video. I've seen it on History Channel about four or five times now. This is tantamount to 'the other guy blinked' in my opinion. He was not quite getting enough bang for the buck on his story so he added this 'incredible energy' codicil to the mix.
I'm not disputing your comments, mind you, just touching base on a topic that has been of interest for many years.
If you still have questions or doubts about your points after checking Tom's page, I'd be happy to go through them point-by-point with you. For instance there's never been shown that the ONI is a real department, as far as I could discover.
Originally posted by granny smith
Unless you accept that some highly inconclusive pictures are what I say they are I won't back up my other wildly speculative claim about Hubble to you.
The home of rational and reasoned proof? LOL
He emailed me a few days ago with some information on helium 3 that I had asked him for.
…when Bob obviously knows nothing about anything.
Originally posted by Outrageo
Hi John – just curious regarding this seeming contradiction:
A few posts back, you said – in the same post – that you had asked Bob Lazar for some information on an isotope you had asked him about, and then later, in a rather sarcastic manner, implied that Lazar was actually a complete and utter ignoramus:
He emailed me a few days ago with some information on helium 3 that I had asked him for.
…when Bob obviously knows nothing about anything.
Assuming this was tongue-in-cheek; can you explain this rather bizarre, but conspicuous animosity that both you and Bob Lazar have expressed toward each other?
Thanks – I enjoy your many viewpoints on the forum (though I wish Lazar himself would chime in (perhaps he has!)
Originally posted by bergle
It would seem aparant that not the US goverment even can control Lazar....hes reasonably safe with the noteriety.....but let his name get forgotten and....
I wonder how he feels after all the s^&*t and still no disclosier and they are all still arguing over whether hes full of s667T OR NOT, WHILE THE WORLD UNDERGROUND GOVT GETS MORE BLOATED AND STINKS HIGHER EVERY DAY,.....
I REMEMBER WHEN WE WERE GOING TO CHANGE THE WORLD, AND INSTEAD THE WORLD CHANGED US!
Originally posted by Thodeph
Charming...
So John, are you really Bob's friend, or his friend slash controller?