It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jfj123
1. Of course there were planes, thousands of people saw them not to mention video, cameras, etc...
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by jfj123
1. Of course there were planes, thousands of people saw them not to mention video, cameras, etc...
Please confirm the identity of the alleged planes involved.
Thanks.
Originally posted by jfj123
Why? What does that have to do with anything?
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by jfj123
Why? What does that have to do with anything?
The official story identitifies the two planes allegedly involved, without offering any proof.
It's a bit absurd to claim that two planes hit the towers, without offering proof to identify them.
Originally posted by jfj123
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by jfj123
Why? What does that have to do with anything?
The official story identitifies the two planes allegedly involved, without offering any proof.
It's a bit absurd to claim that two planes hit the towers, without offering proof to identify them.
That's silly. So what you're saying is as follows:
Lets say you got ran over by a car and you are the only witness. The police ask you to identify the car but you can't. So they tell you that since you cannot positively ID the car, you were never hit by it. That is some really bad logic you have there.
Originally posted by jfj123
That's silly. So what you're saying is as follows:
Lets say you got ran over by a car and you are the only witness. The police ask you to identify the car but you can't. So they tell you that since you cannot positively ID the car, you were never hit by it. That is some really bad logic you have there.
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by jfj123
That's silly. So what you're saying is as follows:
Lets say you got ran over by a car and you are the only witness. The police ask you to identify the car but you can't. So they tell you that since you cannot positively ID the car, you were never hit by it. That is some really bad logic you have there.
I wasn't typing about being hit by cars, jfj123.
All I asked you to do was to make a positive ID on the allaged planes that hit the towers.
Originally posted by jfj123
What does making a positve ID on the planes, have to do with whether they existed or not. We do know planes, of some sort, hit the buildings as we have thousands of witnesses, videos, images, etc...
So what is your point?
Originally posted by jfj123
What does making a positve ID on the planes, have to do with whether they existed or not. We do know planes, of some sort, hit the buildings as we have thousands of witnesses, videos, images, etc...
So what is your point?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
What does making a positve ID on the planes, have to do with whether they existed or not. We do know planes, of some sort, hit the buildings as we have thousands of witnesses, videos, images, etc...
So what is your point?
A positive ID has a lot to do with a proper investigation.
How do we know the planes were not military planes or planes from another country unless we have a positive id?
Originally posted by tezzajw
Wow, you can't see the point of making a positive ID on the planes. Unreal.
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by jfj123
What does making a positve ID on the planes, have to do with whether they existed or not. We do know planes, of some sort, hit the buildings as we have thousands of witnesses, videos, images, etc...
So what is your point?
Wow, you can't see the point of making a positive ID on the planes. Unreal.
You don't know the contents of the alleged planes. You don't know who owned the alleged planes. You know nothing about those alleged planes that allegedly hit the towers until you can make a positive ID on them, yet you wave your hands around this, as though it doesn't matter?
Originally posted by jfj123
That's not relevant to my point that there were some type of planes.
Originally posted by gavron
reply to post by jfj123
don't forget, jfj, tezza freely admits he trolls. I think he is just playing with you...
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
That's not relevant to my point that there were some type of planes.
But it is relevant to a proper investigation.
Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
As for this whole conspiracy theory that the govt. wnted them dead because they needed oil for reptilians who have been working with our govt. to abduct us.
Originally posted by jfj123
but I am claiming some type of planes did indeed hit the towers.
Originally posted by jfj123
Still not relevant to my point.