It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jfj123
Now to answer this question specifically. If the plane was hit by a missile while in flight, it would lose mass from the explosion prior to impact.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
Now to answer this question specifically. If the plane was hit by a missile while in flight, it would lose mass from the explosion prior to impact.
Really, are you sure? Would it would lose mass if it was hit by a missile in an engine?
Would it lose mass if it was hit by cannon fire instead of a missile?
Originally posted by jfj123
YES if a missile hit it, the missile would explode and scatter plane parts while the plane was still in the air.
And cannon fire??? Really? Are you saying they shot it with a cannon? REALLY???? A cannon???
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
YES if a missile hit it, the missile would explode and scatter plane parts while the plane was still in the air.
Kind of like the large area of debris shows.
And cannon fire??? Really? Are you saying they shot it with a cannon? REALLY???? A cannon???
Originally posted by jfj123
You didn't specify what kind of cannon, I just had to guess what you meant....as usual.
What would be the point of using a gun instead of a missile?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Are you really serious, what other cannon would i be talking about?
Not all the fighters sent to intercept the airliners were carrying missiles. Again maybe you should do some research and get a little more information before responding.
Originally posted by gavron
Were the guns on the planes loaded with cannon ammunition?
Originally posted by gavron
Perhaps you should read the post above mine. It just makes you silly and immature.
Originally posted by gavron
Otherwise you are lying again.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by gavron
Were the guns on the planes loaded with cannon ammunition?
Gee, thanks for showing you do not read post on here.
This question has been answered. You really should read post or get someone to read them for you.
[edit on 19-9-2008 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by gavron
I am asking you show the post in this thread that answers my question:
Originally posted by Boone 870
You're right. www.freerepublic.com...
Two of the first F-16s had 500 rounds of TP ammunition and the other one had 105 rounds.
Originally posted by gavron
Boone 870 has not posted in this thread at all. So, the question was NOT answered in this thread.
Originally posted by gavron
If it was not, then you once again have lied.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by gavron
Were the guns on the planes loaded with cannon ammunition?
Gee, thanks for showing you do not read post on here.
This question has been answered. You really should read post or get someone to read them for you.
Originally posted by gavron
So, perhaps next time, the proper thing would be to post a link to boones thread, rather than start whining and crying and calling people immature.
It would be the adult thing to do.