It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
None of the official reports state it was a combination since they have not been released.
Originally posted by gavron
None of the official reports state the fire was the primary cause, since they have not been released yet.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
You didn't specify what kind of cannon, I just had to guess what you meant....as usual.
Are you really serious, what other cannon would i be talking about?
If you do not know anything about what is being posted maybe you should not respond, or try doing some research to get information before responding so you do not look so immature.
What would be the point of using a gun instead of a missile?
Not all the fighters sent to intercept the airliners were carrying missiles.
Again maybe you should do some research and get a little more information before responding.
[edit on 19-9-2008 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by NextGen5
The towers collapsed due to structural failure. The fires, i would believe, played a smaller part than two other major factors. One, being that a JUMBO JET crashed through the entire building, destroying the support beams that were located in the center of the building.
Problem is most reports state that the buildings withstood the plane impacts and that fire was the main cause of the collapse.
Originally posted by NextGen5
the planes started the fires. they were the cause of the collapse.
Originally posted by gavron
Since those "agencies" are not the official reports, you are only speculating what might be in them.
Originally posted by jfj123
Not all the fighters sent to intercept the airliners were carrying missiles.
Originally posted by jfj123
I've read every report you have posted so far and that is what they all say.
The only individual metal component of the aircraft that is comparable in strength to the box perimeter columns of the WTC is the keel beam at the bottom of the aircraft fuselage. While the aircraft impact undoubtedly destroyed several columns in the WTC perimeter wall, the number of columns lost on the initial impact was not large and the loads were shifted to remaining columns in this highly redundant structure. Of equal or even greater significance during this initial impact was the explosion when 90,000 L gallons of jet fuel, comprising nearly 1/3 of the aircraft’s weight, ignited. The ensuing fire was clearly the principal cause of the collapse.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
Not all the fighters sent to intercept the airliners were carrying missiles.
How do you know?
Originally posted by gavron
The link you provided was from an ARTICLE in the JOM. It was not a report.
Originally posted by jfj123
I didn't see you post any source in this thread. Please point me to it. Thanks.
Originally posted by Boone 870
You're right. www.freerepublic.com...
Two of the first F-16s had 500 rounds of TP ammunition and the other one had 105 rounds.
[edit on 20-9-2008 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by jfj123
I didn't see you post any source in this thread. Please point me to it. Thanks.
Originally posted by Boone 870
You're right. www.freerepublic.com...
Two of the first F-16s had 500 rounds of TP ammunition and the other one had 105 rounds.
[edit on 20-9-2008 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by jfj123
excellent now how can I know that this article is accurate?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
excellent now how can I know that this article is accurate?
Maybe try doing some research, or do you need me to do all that for you?