It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by grover
I can't speak for the older members here, nor for the younger ones either but I can speak about what I have observed.
I just spent 3 years studying graphic arts at a local community college as a second career and I saw a lot, and I do mean a lot of self absorbed children there just like deus for whom, if something didn't immediately affect them, then it wasn't real and if something did affect them, especially adversely, generally they reacted with indignant outrage. If they weren't interested in a subject they could talk while the teacher tried to teach around them or if THEY weren't (or their art) subject of conservation, then they were bored and barely tolerated it until the subject of conservation turned to them. Half the time I felt like they should have all been given through spankings and sent to their rooms, but to be fair there were a lot of good kids too but per usual, the brats stuck out.
I am speaking not about white privilege per say but in general. I was in a class with one specific kid though, who should have known better, he had been around, in the Marines etc but he was completely blind to the fact of how well he had it made, and since he was struggling, it was all someone else's fault, affirmative action, grade preference for minority students etc. when in reality the only thing holding him back was he was simply a dumb f, and not smart enough to know it. I know, I tutored him in English and later psychology and he had a hard time comprehending basic principles much less any thing complicated. AND since he disliked studying he blamed racial preference on the fact that the little Hindi girl who could barely speak English was getting A's and he was getting D's at best. She studied hard, he didn't.
Generally speaking I think that some men (white and also black) see minority's coming over her and busting their asses to get ahead, and blame it on preferences. Sometimes its true and sometimes it isn't. Each case is different. We have become soft and expect a lot more than our parents did, and when we see someone achieving, blame some other factor than hard work for helping them get ahead and fail to accept that often it is just plain stupidity (or bad credit or none or any other factor) holding us back.
I have lived in a black household and I have seen discrimination first hand and I grew up white in the south and remember jim crow... somethings have changed and some haven't. I do know this though, if you and I walk into an upscale shop, dressed identically, I will be waited on first. I would put money down on it and win because I have seen it time and again. You, a black man might be totally above board, and I might be a shoplifter, but the guards will follow you around while I make off with the store. THAT is white privilege.
[edit on 7-3-2007 by grover]
[edit on 7-3-2007 by grover]
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
Well, I shouldnt of put it that way. But you are right. Employers will probably set such a resume to the side.
It is a really #ty deal though. I mean, sometime you dont feel like you have a home here in the USA and you cant really go back to africa either. I have seen the way they treat black americans over there, its like they blame them for their ancestors being captured and brought over here. Or maybe they are envious, hell I dont know. But I think that blacks use names like this to try to preserve some shred of their culture.
Originally posted by grover
I have lived in a black household and I have seen discrimination first hand and I grew up white in the south and remember jim crow... somethings have changed and some haven't. I do know this though, if you and I walk into an upscale shop, dressed identically, I will be waited on first. I would put money down on it and win because I have seen it time and again. You, a black man might be totally above board, and I might be a shoplifter, but the guards will follow you around while I make off with the store. THAT is white privilege.
[edit on 7-3-2007 by grover]
[edit on 7-3-2007 by grover]
Originally posted by truthseeka
See, this trend goes along with non-whites being expected to comform to white society in America. God damn, you can't even name your kid a non-white ethnic name if you want them to have a decent chance at success in America. JUST like your house won't make you as much money if you sell it with non-white ethnic decor in it.
Originally posted by truthseeka
Ah, Deus...
So much to say, yet so little substance. At least your boorish, abrasive voice is easy to hear in here.
Originally posted by Deus_Brandon
There ya go ... attack the poster. LOL .... VOTING THIS ONE WAY ABOVE TOP SECRET .
Originally posted by truthseeka
Ah, Deus...
So much to say, yet so little substance. At least your boorish, abrasive voice is easy to hear in here.
Originally posted by truthseeka
See, this trend goes along with non-whites being expected to comform to white society in America. God damn, you can't even name your kid a non-white ethnic name if you want them to have a decent chance at success in America. JUST like your house won't make you as much money if you sell it with non-white ethnic decor in it.
In an effort to understand the role of race in hiring more clearly, we conducted matched-pair testing of employment opportunities for Blacks in entry-level managerial positions in retail firms in the Chicago suburbs. Our Black and White job-seekers all had the appropriate qualifications and experi-
ence for the positions they sought, and none of them faced any transportation obstacles. Thus, our study made race, and not skills or space, the salient difference between Black and White job-seekers.
...our study demonstrated that employers show preferences for White job-seekers, even when spatial and skills mismatches are eliminated. When we sent resumes of qualified Black and White job applicants...employers contacted nearly one-third of the White applicants for interviews, but only about one-fourth of the Black applicants – giving Whites a 21% higher chance of being contacted for an interview. When we sent matched pairs of Black and White women to apply for jobs in person, Whites received job offers 81% of the time, while Blacks received offers 70% of the time – giving Whites a 16% higher chance of getting a job offer. Moreover, when job offers specified the number of hours an employee would be needed, Whites were offered an average of 36 hours of work a week, while Blacks were offered only 28 hours. At the average wage paid by the employers we tested ($8.86/hour), that translates into a pay difference of almost $4,000 a year.
On the brighter side, we also found that, in more than half of the firms where our Black and White job-seekers applied in person, both the Black and the White applicant were offered jobs, and the offers were similar in terms of the level of the position and the rate of pay.
Today, everywhere from the Justice Department to the Ivy League Universities, the bureaucrats and professors justify discrimination against whites on the basis of the notion of "white skin privilege." According to this concept, legal palliation for America's "past cruelty toward blacks" must come at the expense of all whites, however poor or disadvantaged, based on the fiction that prior to the "Civil Rights" era, all whites had a supreme legal and social position by the very fact of the color of their skin.
The former South Carolina black slave Waters McIntosh recalled, "When I was a boy we used to sing, 'Rather be a 'n-word' than a poor white man."
Black slaves viewed themselves as better than poor whites because their masters did too. According to Eugene Genovese, "Rosa Starke who had been owned by a big planter in South Carolina reported that poor whites had to use the kitchen door when they went up to the Big House. Her mistress 'had a grand manner; no patience with poor white folks."
The negro slave Ella Kelly stated, "You know boss, dese days dere is three kind of people. Lowest down is a layer of white folks, then in de middle is a layer of colored folks, and on top is de cream, a layer of good white folks..."
The hierarchy described by Kelly remains in effect to this day. In the 1930s, when the Dust Bowl forced penniless Oklahoma immigrants west, no "white skin privilege" protected these Okies from being driven from California, beaten and reviled as "maggots."
One doesn’t have to be a superhero to take on responsibility. One doesn’t have to swing through skyscrapers to assume the mantle of civic duty. One simply has to be a man or a woman. But political correctness discourages manhood and womanhood amongst blacks and women, for it romanticizes victimhood. It idealizes the victim. It renders otherwise legitimate disciplines such as Black studies and Women’s studies mere Victim studies.
...
But black studies, as a pseudodiscipline, isn’t interested in dialogue. It’s about the monologue of the victim. No dialectics here. It’s the black bourgeois monolith of victimology. Hence, this pseudodiscipline neutralizes the Garveyite passion for self-reliance and equity. It neutralizes black agency. It encourages the DuBoisian passions of resentment and envy. It entrenches black victimhood. DuBois is its God. Rev. Dr. King is its patron saint. “Somebodiness” is its holy grail.
Victimology and identity politics (read “victim politics”) are the theory and practice of the black bourgeoisie, respectively. The house Negro thereof sees only from the perspective of the victim. Thus, he is the extreme of self-righteousness, which is OK, for, as we all know, the victim is always right. But is he really a victim? Um, no. Come to my neighborhood in Anacostia, Southeast D.C. — I’ll show you some victims. Come hop on the number 109 for a 20-minute bus ride into Chester — I’ll show you some victims. Victims aren’t privy to $38,000-a-year college educations. Blacks here are just as privileged as their white counterparts.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Today, everywhere from the Justice Department to the Ivy League Universities, the bureaucrats and professors justify discrimination against whites on the basis of the notion of "white skin privilege." According to this concept, legal palliation for America's "past cruelty toward blacks" must come at the expense of all whites, however poor or disadvantaged, based on the fiction that prior to the "Civil Rights" era, all whites had a supreme legal and social position by the very fact of the color of their skin.
It's clear to me that many black of people today are more angry at and hate white people much more than their actual slave ancestors.
The former South Carolina black slave Waters McIntosh recalled, "When I was a boy we used to sing, 'Rather be a 'n-word' than a poor white man."
Black slaves viewed themselves as better than poor whites because their masters did too. According to Eugene Genovese, "Rosa Starke who had been owned by a big planter in South Carolina reported that poor whites had to use the kitchen door when they went up to the Big House. Her mistress 'had a grand manner; no patience with poor white folks."
The negro slave Ella Kelly stated, "You know boss, dese days dere is three kind of people. Lowest down is a layer of white folks, then in de middle is a layer of colored folks, and on top is de cream, a layer of good white folks..."
One doesn’t have to be a superhero to take on responsibility. One doesn’t have to swing through skyscrapers to assume the mantle of civic duty. One simply has to be a man or a woman. But political correctness discourages manhood and womanhood amongst blacks and women, for it romanticizes victimhood. It idealizes the victim. It renders otherwise legitimate disciplines such as Black studies and Women’s studies mere Victim studies.
...
But black studies, as a pseudodiscipline, isn’t interested in dialogue. It’s about the monologue of the victim. No dialectics here. It’s the black bourgeois monolith of victimology. Hence, this pseudodiscipline neutralizes the Garveyite passion for self-reliance and equity. It neutralizes black agency. It encourages the DuBoisian passions of resentment and envy. It entrenches black victimhood. DuBois is its God. Rev. Dr. King is its patron saint. “Somebodiness” is its holy grail.
I don't deny that white privilege exists. But black privilege ALSO exists. They each have their specialties, but they're both alive and well in America today, just as racism is. Racism against all races.
But if a black person cannot acknowledge black privilege, he's no better than a white person who denies white privilege, truthseeka.
Originally posted by Deus_Brandon
BTW, Keep attacking me and I might throw some things out there that get me barred from this and every other thread on here. As where I am from you don't say things like you have said here. Although I am such a BOOR and I obviously have no cognitive ability to even be posting here ... ... ...
[edit on 8-3-2007 by Deus_Brandon]
Originally posted by jsobecky
Just a word of advice: don't fall into the trap of responding to personal attacks upon you. That will only get you banned. It's the mod's job to stop those type of attacks.
Remember: when people cannot attack your argument, they try to attack your character. So, stick to the issues and stay away from any attempts to bait you into losing your temper. Stay cool.
In 1998 Rochester elementary student Jessica Haak, who is white, was denied a transfer to a "better" suburban school due to her skin color.
13 year old Julia McLaughlin, who is not a minority, was denied admission to Boston Latin because of her race. Over 100 minority students with scores lower than Julia’s were admitted to the school while Julia was denied entry! In August 1995 her father, an attorney, filed suit
In spite of Sandy Atkins credentials and her extensive teaching experience, the Benton Harbor Area School district has denied her a promotion on at least 10 occasions mostly, as her suit alleges, because she is white. She filed suit in U.S. District Court in Lansing, Michigan on January 6, 2000.