It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by dollmonster
But, the only thing that makes sense is that you left something out of the story.
That's the only thing that makes sense to me.
Hey, I recognize that good old "denial card" being played -- If dollmonster is saying that blacks got the advantage because they were black, then she must have left something out (in other words, lied).
:shk:
How narrow minded of you to assume I lied because you don't believe me. It happened just as I said. He was the only person identified and arrested from the brawl that night. Had the police actually cared about making more arrests, they could have done a little more investigating. But I couldn't care less if you or anyone else believes this or not.
Originally posted by dollmonster
How narrow minded of you to assume I lied because you don't believe me. It happened just as I said. He was the only person identified and arrested from the brawl that night. Had the police actually cared about making more arrests, they could have done a little more investigating. But I couldn't care less if you or anyone else believes this or not.
Originally posted by truthseeka
Dollmonster...
I don't know what all happened with your son. But, the only thing that makes sense is that you left something out of the story.
Originally posted by phoenixhasrisin
Originally posted by BHI didn't think my brother in law was funny. In fact, I was always very uncomfortable with his little "jokes". I said he was trying to be funny, not that I thought he was funny. Just to be clear.
I think that's good. But you need to see what I am trying to get at here.
What you described is not unlike much that I have witnessed as being a half breed. Many white people are very cordial to other races to their faces. But, as soon as they are amongst themselves, the jokes begin, and I have had the unfortunate experience of hearing this first hand because as they later said: "They didn't think I was black".
Originally posted by jsobecky
You certainly aren't talking about me avoiding the topic, are you, truthceeca? Because I addressed this earlier on in this thread:
Originally posted by jsobecky
Today's version of white privilege is probably nothing more than "circling the wagons" in response to the advantages being given to non-whites.
I see nothing wrong with white privilege, as long as it doesn't break any laws.
No, I'm not.
I have nothing to say to you. You acknowledge that it exists, but, more importantly, you are HAPPY that it does. Why should I respond to something like that? Why should I?
When someone is HAPPY that they are given things because they're white, yet ironically is OPPOSED to someone getting things because they're not white, why should I say something? People who share your sentiments, yet have more power than you, are the ones who keep this crap going. As far as your reasoning, .
You care to tell me when AA FIRST debuted? I'm sure white privilege didn't have more than a 300 year head start in America...right?
Originally posted by jsobecky
The south was only comprised of a handful of states, not a continent. More like a small region of a large country.
And the same can be said about every piece of land on earth throughout history. So what?
So, go ahead. Argue "white privilege". I already told you that I see nothing wrong with it. And any time I get the chance to use it to my advantage, I will. Does that make me a racist? About as much as taking advantage of AA makes you a racist.
Originally posted by wagnerian21
White priviledge is a LIE.
Figure 6 [the graph in question] presents the percentage of callbacks received for both categories of black testers relative to those for whites. The effect of race in these findings is strikingly large. Among blacks without criminal records, only 14% received callbacks, relative to 34% of white noncriminals (P.01). In fact, even whites with criminal records received more favorable treatment (17%) than blacks without criminal records (14%).
The rank ordering of groups in this graph is painfully revealing of employer preferences: race continues to play a dominant role in shaping employment
opportunities, equal to or greater than the impact of a criminal record.
Of course, OPM doesn't call it "over hiring" of minorities. They call it "meeting or exceeding affirmative action goals."
Originally posted by truthseeka
When someone is HAPPY that they are given things because they're white, yet ironically is OPPOSED to someone getting things because they're not white, why should I say something? People who share your sentiments, yet have more power than you, are the ones who keep this crap going.
Originally posted by truthseeka
Originally posted by jsobecky
The south was only comprised of a handful of states, not a continent. More like a small region of a large country.
Who said it was a continent? They wanted to secede from the Union. What part of that don't you understand?
And the same can be said about every piece of land on earth throughout history. So what?
Your cavalier attitude about this speaks volumes. Not only do you minimize slavery and genocide in the formation of the US, you ignore the crucial role racism played in the foundation of America. Well, you can't ignore this: who was referenced, no, EXCLUDED in the "all men are created equal" rhetoric?
Originally posted by wagnerian21
Originally posted by riley
Truthseeka,
If white privilege exists.. why are their millions of whites living below the poverty line? They are obviously not privileged.. care to explain why they are not benefitting from having white skin?
Don`t bother.....anyone who raises a legit point in this thread that he happens to disagree with, he`ll either conviently ignore or he`ll try to engage in character assassination, as I showed in my earlier post. This is logic he can`t conceivably refute. Therefore, he`ll ignore it.
It`s a damn good point though, and rest assured that you aren`t the only one who sees it.
White priviledge is a LIE.
Originally posted by riley
As for white privilege.. when the millions of whites living under the poverty line suddenly dissapear you might have a point.
Originally posted by truthseeka
I jump at whites who show fear in their eyes. You should see them fall all over themselves when I do this. I move towards whites who start going the other way, as well as those who move away in the elevator or move to count their money. ... And, why not?
Originally posted by riley
If white privilege exists.. why are their millions of whites living below the poverty line? They are obviously not privileged.. care to explain why they are not benefitting from having white skin?
Originally posted by Dock6
.
WHICH 'white privilege' ?
If a 'white' breaks the law, he pays the penalty.
If a 'white' behaves suspiciously within a store, he attracts the attention and scrutiny of security.
Some 'whites' rise to prominence, fame, wealth --- and many do not, despite their efforts.
'Whites' suffer poverty, denial of justice, hardship in the same way as those who regard themselves as non-white.
'Whites' are subjected to competitive. often unfair environments, lifelong.
The only difference between 'whites' and 'non whites' is the fact that 'WHITES' are not provided the opportunity to blame 'non whites' for their predicament ! Unless they're the 'whites' who ARE being and have been butchered by 'non whites' in places such as Africa, perhaps.
Originally posted by grover
Originally posted by Dock6
.
WHICH 'white privilege' ?
If a 'white' breaks the law, he pays the penalty.
If a 'white' behaves suspiciously within a store, he attracts the attention and scrutiny of security.
Some 'whites' rise to prominence, fame, wealth --- and many do not, despite their efforts.
'Whites' suffer poverty, denial of justice, hardship in the same way as those who regard themselves as non-white.
'Whites' are subjected to competitive. often unfair environments, lifelong.
The only difference between 'whites' and 'non whites' is the fact that 'WHITES' are not provided the opportunity to blame 'non whites' for their predicament ! Unless they're the 'whites' who ARE being and have been butchered by 'non whites' in places such as Africa, perhaps.
WRONG!!! I am a white man who was married into a black family and I witnessed first hand what white privilege is. I was called down to the police station once to pick up my oldest step son. Seems he had been hanging out with his white friends (this was in Maine in the 80's when blacks composed .1% of the population) when the cops stopped and searched them. A little pot was found on one of the other (white) kids but the police did not arrest the kid they found it on, they arrested my step-son, solely because he was black. We got the whole thing thrown out and the officers reprimanded, but if I had been black, that boy would have ended up in jail.
Originally posted by riley
Truthseeka,
If white privilege exists.. why are their millions of whites living below the poverty line? They are obviously not privileged.. care to explain why they are not benefitting from having white skin?
[edit on 6-3-2007 by riley]
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Since YOU asked why not ...
Because it's ignorant and a damned immature thing to do. Instead of acting like a civlilized human being and helping to dispell errors in thinking, you perpetuate and confirm them with this kind of behavior. This behavior makes it hard for other black people. By your behavior you are causing more problems for black people in general. Congratulations.
Your off-topic confession about being an unrepentant racist punk says a alot. :shk:
BTW .. as far as 'counts their money' in public - If someone is at an ATM and is checking their withdrawl from the machine it is common sense and common courtesy to give them the privacy to do so. And if people move away from you, it is most likely because of (*drumroll*) ... you. Seriously ... do you have body odor? Try using Sure deodorant and change your attitude (cuz it stinks). Don't try to blame whitey for your attitude or for the responses you get to it. It's your own choice to act like a punk instead of an adult. Excercising some black privilege??
Originally posted by truthseeka
Originally posted by riley
Truthseeka,
If white privilege exists.. why are their millions of whites living below the poverty line? They are obviously not privileged.. care to explain why they are not benefitting from having white skin?
[edit on 6-3-2007 by riley]
Had you paid attention earlier in the thread, you would see why I'm ignoring you. Let's try it again...
White privilege is not all about money.,/I> Did you see it THIS time?
There's another figure I'm looking for right now. It compares wealth accumulation in poor blacks, whites, and Hispanics. And, surprise surprise , the poor whites are NOT poor when compared to the poor Hispanics and blacks. NOW WHY WOUDL YO GO BACK AND SAY THIS after just saying what you said BEFORE ???
Try again, riley. Btw, you have any idea why that study I cited showed that black males with no criminal record are NO BETTER OFF than whites with criminal records? Couldn't be white privilege, could it?
..any alien, being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for a term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof.
A free Negro of the African race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the Constitution of the United States...Consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them.
Originally posted by truthseeka
Face it. Whites have been historically privileged in America. A look at the books can verify this.
Originally posted by truthseeka
You need to practice reading. I said at stores/restaurants, NOT at ATMs.
Originally posted by truthseeka
or the ones who move 10 feet away from me when they pull out their money,
Originally posted by truthseeka
I don't have the "n.igger stink" you OBVIOUSLY are referring to.
and make them look stupid.
Kodak's aggressive, forced-diversity policies and procedures actively exclude non-minority employees, suppliers and subcontractors
FitzGerald was repeatedly told he could not be hired for certain jobs within McDonald's because those jobs had been reserved exclusively for non-whites. (McDonald's calls these quota-jobs "diversity positions".)