It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Get Smart! Epispde 52

page: 10
49
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 04:21 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 04:23 PM
link   
a reply to: twitchy




Pretty big damned boom if you ask me, oddly immediately preceeding the collapses of both WTC 1 and WTC 2. 911research.wtc7.net...

And just how many experts say that it matches a nuke?
Odd how they got the nukes to the correct floors to match the plane impacts.
Also odd how nothing was ejected with great force at the EXACT instant the buildings started their collapse.

Maybe it was a BLACK HOLE nuke !!!
Yea that's it !
The black hole nuke sucked in a lot of the debris so the final pile was only a few stories high !
I solved 911 !! That that Judy Woods !
edit on 29-12-2015 by samkent because: additional



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 04:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: wildb
Because of people like you..


You mean people who point out the problems with silly 9/11 conspiracy theories!


Because there not allowed too. Overseas is another story..


Overseas most stories were on how silly 9/11 conspiracy theories are....


It is more alive then ever, it has become a world wide movement..


Care to show evidence of this "world wide movement"?



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 04:27 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 04:30 PM
link   
a reply to: samkent

How many 'experts' do you reckon would publicly comment on it? There was one that worked at Pallisades who said it looked consistent with an underground detonation, of course you won't find that laying around on the net now even tough it was something that was reported in the MSM at the time....
I'd say 600 feet of lateral ejection at a 45 degree angle is a pretty decent amount of 'great force'.
Blackhole nuke now is it? You guys should send ole Howard Roark back in, at least he wasn't as condescending and repetitive.



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 04:32 PM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce




You mean people who point out the problems with silly 9/11 conspiracy theories!


There is nothing silly about 3000 dead Americans, why don't you tell that to the victims family's. Your spitting in there face, you should be ashamed of yourself.

911 was a conspiracy.. get a clue..





Overseas most stories were on how silly 9/11 conspiracy theories are....



Again get a clue, most were about the OS being a lie, which it is..




Care to show evidence of this "world wide movement"?



Yeah thats easy, google 911 truth..
edit on 29-12-2015 by wildb because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 04:38 PM
link   
donaldfox.wordpress.com...
Have any of you guys even looked at that link? Here, I'll even help you guys a little, i.e. Debunk that, and the fallout would be a dead issue, no?



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 04:42 PM
link   
a reply to: twitchy



LOL I'm guessing you've not read a damned thing I've posted, you ask me where I got my information from about fallout, and your bloody quote even has a piece of the link I supplied. I love a good debate, but you're too much for me.


I know what I am talking about because of my more than 40 years in military aviation, (Air Force and Army) and 18 months with the Navy as a civilian worker on nuclear submarines, in addition to my employment with defense contractors and my wartime experiences. It all adds up to knowledge that places me in a prime position to debunk disinformation that is being spread by 9/11 conspiracy theorist. I might further add that my Wing Commander was inside the Pentagon when American 77 struck.

If you want to know who I am, you can find me on the Internet. I have led chapters which consist of military and civilian pilots, (commercial, instructor, private, sport and student pilots), military and FAA-certified aircraft technicians, military officers and enlisted personnel, and military and civilian DoD retirees.

About the other seismic data, "On that graph, the 8- and 10-second collapses appear—misleadingly—as a pair of sudden spikes. Lamont-Doherty's 40-second plot of the same data (Graph 2) gives a much more detailed picture: The seismic waves—blue for the South Tower, red for the North Tower—start small and then escalate as the buildings rumble to the ground. Translation: no bombs.

.

edit on 29-12-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 04:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: twitchy
donaldfox.wordpress.com...
Have any of you guys even looked at that link? Here, I'll even help you guys a little, i.e. Debunk that, and the fallout would be a dead issue, no?


Read his full paper, its very good and not all about 911, its called America nuked..



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 04:44 PM
link   
a reply to: samkent
As much of a third of the mass of the towers was literally atomized into micron sized particulate, so I'm glad you brought up a 'blackhole nuke', maybe you're right as there's nothing on this planet aside from a nuclear detonation or a chemical reaction that would explain that pulverized concrete. The energy required to do that has never been accounted for, certainly not by NIST or the 9/11 commission.



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 04:46 PM
link   
 




 


(post by MotherMayEye removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)

posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 04:47 PM
link   
a reply to: twitchy

Just to let you know the WTC nuke story was a hoax and has been used to discredit the Truth Movment.

Would you like to know who planted that hoax?
edit on 29-12-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 04:49 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 04:50 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 04:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: twitchy
a reply to: samkent
As much of a third of the mass of the towers was literally atomized into micron sized particulate, so I'm glad you brought up a 'blackhole nuke', maybe you're right as there's nothing on this planet aside from a nuclear detonation or a chemical reaction that would explain that pulverized concrete. The energy required to do that has never been accounted for, certainly not by NIST or the 9/11 commission.



Good point, but you know a few facts will not get under all that sand and into there brain to register..



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 04:57 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 05:01 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 05:03 PM
link   
Closed for staff review.



posted on Dec, 29 2015 @ 05:50 PM
link   
ATTENTION!!!

Please review this post about the 9/11 forum before posting again.

The topic IS NOT each other - EVER!!!

This starts again and accounts will be in jeopardy.

Blaine91555
Moderator



new topics

top topics



 
49
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join