It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by johnlear
I think common sense would be enough...but if you believe that Venus has an atmosphere of sulphuric acid plus 90 bars of pressure plus hot flowing lava all over the place plus a surface temperature of 800 degrees... I've got some valuable swampland to sell you.
Uh huh. Please remember that the only gas giant in our solar system is NASA.
[
Originally posted by Mouth
Originally posted by johnlear
I think common sense would be enough...but if you believe that Venus has an atmosphere of sulphuric acid plus 90 bars of pressure plus hot flowing lava all over the place plus a surface temperature of 800 degrees... I've got some valuable swampland to sell you.
Common sense? I asked for evidence, and you reply with some garbage. The ONLY scientific proof that we have to go by is by experts who actually do all of the research. YOU are not even close to qualified. it is a PROVEN fact that the farther away you are from a heat source, the less energy you receive, and vice versa. Good luck trying to stand on the surface of mercury.
Oh yeah, lets not even get into the whole bit about oxygen.
By your "claims," do you also think it is possible to live on the moon? You do realize that it is impossible to breath without an atmosphere, right?
Uh huh. Please remember that the only gas giant in our solar system is NASA.
[
Much like the gas that is within your skull.
Whatever man, it is pretty obvious that you have no knowledge of astronomy or physics, which means you are not credible to say the least.
Originally posted by InSaneTK
How do you know that our planets in our solar system is not inhabitable? Have you ever seen the planet for your own eyes? been on it? You only belive what NASA has said, what if what they say is a lie?, a part of the alien cover up.
To me you seem to ridicule other people that think otherwise then your impression on the world. This is also comes from using the smileys: and ...
Common sense? I asked for evidence, and you reply with some garbage. The ONLY scientific proof that we have to go by is by experts who actually do all of the research. YOU are not even close to qualified. it is a PROVEN fact that the farther away you are from a heat source, the less energy you receive, and vice versa. Good luck trying to stand on the surface of mercury.
Oh yeah, lets not even get into the whole bit about oxygen.
By your "claims," do you also think it is possible to live on the moon?
You do realize that it is impossible to breath without an atmosphere, right?
Much like the gas that is within your skull.
Whatever man, it is pretty obvious that you have no knowledge of astronomy or physics, which means you are not credible to say the least.
Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by Mouth
Common sense? I asked for evidence, and you reply with some garbage. The ONLY scientific proof that we have to go by is by experts who actually do all of the research. YOU are not even close to qualified. it is a PROVEN fact that the farther away you are from a heat source, the less energy you receive, and vice versa. Good luck trying to stand on the surface of mercury.
That would be correct if, in fact, the sun was a continuous thermonuclear explosion as previously thought. However, current scientific wisdom, as noted by the "Doc", a former NASA employee, is that the sun is a gigantic electromagnetic sphere which in turn generates the eletromagnetic fields of other planets. In other words the sun seems to be more of a gigantic electrical light than a gigantic thermonuclear reactor. This means that 'heat' experienced from the solor orb on a planets' surface is not so much determined by their proximity to the the sun, but more by the amount and type of atmosphere with which the solar rays interact to produce friction and heat. In simple terms, the sun is not 'hot' in the sense that most believe, but the solar flares and explosions taking place on the surface of the sun are more consistent with tremendous electrical 'arcs' than with nuclear explosions. Although you have been led, by ancient scientific dogma, to believe that the surface of Mercury is hot enough to melt lead, Mercury is actually a nice, comfortable place to live.
Oh yeah, lets not even get into the whole bit about oxygen.
Oh c'mon Mouth. Lets! What would you like to know?
By your "claims," do you also think it is possible to live on the moon?
Humans from this planet have been going to and living and working on the moon since 1962. Thats roughly 44 years. I once talked to an engineer who helped build a mining machine here on earth for transport to the moon. He told me that when the project was finished he rented an airplane to fly around it just to get an idea of how big the machine was. People go back and forth to the moon all day every day.
You do realize that it is impossible to breath without an atmosphere, right?
The moon does have an atmosphere, equivalent in some places to about 15,000 to 18,000 feet on earth. In some places and in lower valleys even more. The atmosphere on the moon is what makes the sky blue and what makes high res video tapes disappear. I realize that its impossible to breathe without an atmosphere but fortunately for those who live and work on the moon, there is plenty of atmosphere to breathe and besides they never have to go outside for that long. Inside there is normal breathing.
Much like the gas that is within your skull.
Much the same.
Whatever man, it is pretty obvious that you have no knowledge of astronomy or physics, which means you are not credible to say the least.
I must have a little bit otherwise you wouldn't be wasting your time here. Right? I mean, no sense in debating with a complete dunce, is there?
When I argue with people whom I consider to be complete dunces I always give them the benefit of the doubt and try not to call their ideas 'garbage'. Just in case.
I think your right about everything you said, i watched a video on the net for a week ago where some guy said the moon even got plants growing on it now that change color in seasions.
What makes me really really sad is WHY we are not told the truth!!!
Originally posted by johnlear
Do you think anybody would believe it? If President Bush appeared with VP Cheney and Secretary of State Rice, the Secretary of Defence and the Joint Chiefs of Staff and his cabinet and said, "My fellow Americans, there are rivers, lakes, meadows, clouds, trees, people, houses, buildings and gigantic machines on the moon, 99% of the population would say "Thats garbage."
Originally posted by Diplomat
So if there are plants on the moon, a nice breathable atmosphere, and little communities of humans that have been living there for years, then what exactly is the reason for not telling the public about all of this? I can understand why the government might want to keep alien visitation to Earth a secret, but why hide something like simply going back and forth to the moon and that it actually has an atmosphere? It doesn't make sense to keep that a big secret lol...
Originally posted by InSaneTK
Originally posted by Diplomat
So if there are plants on the moon, a nice breathable atmosphere, and little communities of humans that have been living there for years, then what exactly is the reason for not telling the public about all of this? I can understand why the government might want to keep alien visitation to Earth a secret, but why hide something like simply going back and forth to the moon and that it actually has an atmosphere? It doesn't make sense to keep that a big secret lol...
Because the aliens got a base on the back side of the moon :O That's what i heard.
And people can actualy think by themself, imagine if they actualy said the moon was like that. People would start to ask what else is secret about our solar system.
And what spacecraft are they traveling in. It would reveale everything.
[edit on 17-8-2006 by InSaneTK]
Originally posted by Diplomat
So if there are plants on the moon, a nice breathable atmosphere, and little communities of humans that have been living there for years, then what exactly is the reason for not telling the public about all of this? I can understand why the government might want to keep alien visitation to Earth a secret, but why hide something like simply going back and forth to the moon and that it actually has an atmosphere? It doesn't make sense to keep that a big secret lol...
And another thing, you can go out at night and look at a full moon with the naked eye and can clearly tell that it is just a boring desolate rock floating out there. Oh let me guess, "they" are also controlling what we see right? It's just one big fake painting up here hahah...
[edit on 17-8-2006 by Diplomat]
So if there are plants on the moon, a nice breathable atmosphere, and little communities of humans that have been living there for years, then what exactly is the reason for not telling the public about all of this? I can understand why the government might want to keep alien visitation to Earth a secret, but why hide something like simply going back and forth to the moon and that it actually has an atmosphere? It doesn't make sense to keep that a big secret lol...
And another thing, you can go out at night and look at a full moon with the naked eye and can clearly tell that it is just a boring desolate rock floating out there.
Oh let me guess, "they" are also controlling what we see right?
It's just one big fake painting up here hahah...
Originally posted by johnlear
Its not exactly 'floating' Diplomat. Its in orbit around the earth. And it is in rotational lock which means only one side faces earth. The side facing earth may look boring but its not. Mare Crisium, the little round thing at the the one o'clock position has several domes, one of them over Yerkes. "Malibu" is known for its strange brightness. Prom. Agurum has a city and huge construct of some sort. More to the 12 oclock position Endymion has the remants of what once must have been a dome. The the northwest of Endymion is de la Rue which is a huge, beautiful arch which can be seen on any reasonable enlargement of the moon. There are only a few in any case, most taken by the Lick Observatory in the 40's and 50's. You don't seen any recent, unretouched photos of the full moon. Bullialdus down near Tycho with is strange huge tubes, Gassendi with its strange markings. Ukert, with its perfectly equilateral triangle shape. Copernicus, Mt. Piton (what is that thing anyway?) Oh its not boring Diplomat, but you have to know where to look and you can't find that watching American Idol.
Originally posted by observe50
Long ago the Moon was not in the right position it was the Grey's that moved this hollow metal orb into the correct position. What is within the Moon is quite interesting itself.
I would love to see good photos of all the places you describe on the moon... Do not say you have none because with all the amazing telescopes( not gov't owned) on this earth there must be some photos.
If you have no proof you cannot make such huge claims.