It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by marko1970
Originally posted by AngelaLadyS
I wanted to point something out right quick about this self-awareness/soul thing. Self-awareness isn't a prerequ for having a soul, nor does it mean that a creature has one.
Many people (look at the case of Terry that was drug through the courts before they killed her) - We know she had a soul, but the doctors insisted she had no self-awareness.
Hmmmmm.
The Terry Schaivo case. Indeed a great point.
She was absolutely a living, breathing being. Indeed has a soul, although no longer connected to the physical body.
So, just a hunch, or an opinion, but I'm thinking the Brain is the connecting point between the soul & the physical body during one's life.
I Think the Terry Schaivo example was a good one to bring up!
It shows the difference between the soul, & "self-awareness".
Originally posted by GameSetMatch
Originally posted by AngelaLadySWow. That's quite different from anything I've heard or contemplated. Do you believe in a Creater or that we just accidentaly exploded into being (whatever they call that now days).
I believe in a Creator. There is no accidents everything happens for a reason even if we do not understand or comprehend it at the time.
Originally posted by Thymus
Sure, we all experience godlike activity all around this planet. However, some people can figure out what it is.
But how come, Greys don't call themselves GODs at Area51, at the same time they are doing very good things to us? And how come, other aliens force humans to worship them as GODs , still keeping them in primitive, poor situations compared to other nations?
Just some thoughts about the existance of GOD.
Originally posted by AngelaLadyS
But I am thinking that you feel as if Aliens are God?
And I'd like to make a quick point, for God to be God, there can only be one of Him. But those who talk about aliens and greys etc, always talk about them in plural context.
Can you help me 'get', to a better degree, what it is you follow as a general belief system. (I don't want to believe that you think aliens are God, I guess this is my denial and 'double checking').
The Soul is a place/container.... The Ego goes in that container/place.... and the Spirit is the fuel, or driving force for everything.. it sustains, promotes, runs everything.
The Ego to me is who we are as individuals... and just like our physical bodies our Ego bodies can wear "clothing" per-se... like anger, as a ripped garment, or jealousy, or concepts and good things as well... but stripped naked the ego is itself, unchangable, like our physical bodies... only by forced 'butchery'(plastic surgery) can it be changed.... and its changes are permanent... same goes for the EGO, when you do plastic surgery on it.. [plastic surgery for the ego IMO is drugs]
Now as far as the soul being a 'place or container'... it's just the opposite actualy. It needs no container, but it just so happens that here in this 3D physical life, we have one - the body. After death we are free! No longer are we TRAPPED in this 'container'
Originally posted by AngelaLadyS
And those that don't believe in God, also try to say there is no soul or spirit (or anything else they can't see or scientificaly test).
That's why this was a bit confusing to answer and I left things kind of 'seperated out'.
Originally posted by T0by
I agree with someone in a previous post about it being up to us what happens after we die.
Our own creative freedom, and creational powers are somewhat limited in the physical world, due to its density.
A question that needs to be answered is how much of our consciousness/awareness is a product of our brain, and how much is of our 'soul' if it exists.
A random thought, what if we were modified in the past from apes to humans in order to become suitable carriers for our souls?
Originally posted by saint4God
We do know the body and the soul are two separate things:
"Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell." - Matthew 10:28
That there is a shepherd and an overseer:
"To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in his steps.
"He committed no sin, and no deceit was found in his mouth." When they hurled their insults at him, he did not retaliate; when he suffered, he made no threats. Instead, he entrusted himself to him who judges justly. He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness; by his wounds you have been healed. For you were like sheep going astray, but now you have returned to the Shepherd and Overseer of your souls." - 1 Peter 21:25
Does that mean the soul can be destroyed?
"As surely as I live, declares the Sovereign LORD, you will no longer quote this proverb in Israel. For every living soul belongs to me, the father as well as the son—both alike belong to me. The soul who sins is the one who will die." - Ezekiel 18:4
How do you keep the soul alive then?
"so that, just as sin reigned in death, so also grace might reign through righteousness to bring eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." - Romans 5:21
Originally posted by dnero6911
You know Saint... I read a lot of your replies.. its not that your uneducated.. because obviously you are a scholar of sorts or you wouldn't be able to quote and remember quotes...
Originally posted by dnero6911
But My only problem with you, and its not really a problem, more of wish that you would maybe hold more credence to your actual experiences... You quote stuff but it seems its just a bunch of pretty words.. like you don't actual understand it.. (not saying you don't) but you don't relate it to life.. or how you incorporate your learnings into life.. you seem more like your speaking at people.. (which I do all too much).. but I was hoping to more hear your experiences with your knowledge than just your knowledge.. I've already replied to this thread and no one responded to me so I refer to that post.. this is by no means a 'flame' war... I just was hoping I could relate to you Saint, because we all have such a hard time explaining ourselves, we need to better articulate ourselves.. (me aswell).. using the old texts as a means to explain anything isn't explaining anything new.. or better... thats the problem. We as the 'new' thinkers need to explain it to the new thinkers in a way that relates to their experiences.. I dunno anymore man.. blah
Originally posted by dnero6911
AngelaLadyS,
I *believe* we are saying the exact same thing perhaps, I just think semantics are to blame here... You have to understand that we are individuals as well as being 'the whole' ... this is not covered enough... the individual thing is not seperate from the whole.. in other words.. being an individual does not mean you have strayed away from the source... thats impossible, its our perception and I would like to give two definitions of perception (the psychological)
Originally posted by dnero6911
The belief that the ego is bad and must be destroyed is ludacris... have fun destroying yourself, because that is who we are..
Originally posted by dnero6911
Our 'ego' obtains/attains energy... in our neuro-net... adding to our energy...
We misunderstand the nature of the 'soul' and the nature of the 'ego' .. remember there are 3 to the trinity...
it is
SPIRIT - which runs everything
SOUL - (gas tank for spirit)
EGO - the machine, the individual... the spark, the knowing, the awareness, the observation of God...
Originally posted by dnero6911
I would also like to comment on your post here..
Now as far as the soul being a 'place or container'... it's just the opposite actualy. It needs no container, but it just so happens that here in this 3D physical life, we have one - the body. After death we are free! No longer are we TRAPPED in this 'container'[/ex
That is a big misconception... we are free already.. we simply haven't realized it..
This 'prison' is a prison of thought... the body is a by-product of the combination of spirit and soul...
I see what your saying, and I undersatnd your point of view - but it isn't the same as mine. I believe differently.
Originally posted by dnero6911
(see what I'm saying here?)
the spirit goes in the soul...(as above)
the ego goes in the flesh...(as below)
Well, spirit/soul are the parts of us that are non physical and they continue to live on eternaly. The ego is in the flesh, is a part of the flesh etc. This I can agree with.
Originally posted by Thymus
Originally posted by AngelaLadyS
And those that don't believe in God, also try to say there is no soul or spirit (or anything else they can't see or scientificaly test).
That's why this was a bit confusing to answer and I left things kind of 'seperated out'.
Trying to say: either believe in God, or just back up your posts with proof?
Originally posted by Thymus
Also, I am clearly aware of your knowledge, I know that youu KNOW things you just don't want to post here. Anyway, I don't really want to beg youu to post me anything useful, simply watching your mistakes. Whether they are well set up, or not. Because it seems to be, that anything ruled out from your "belief" is wonderful information-flow for me.
It applies to other aliens on this site, not just to you.
PS: why do youu dislike Greys exactly?
Originally posted by dnero6911
You know Saint... I read a lot of your replies.. its not that your uneducated.. because obviously you are a scholar of sorts or you wouldn't be able to quote and remember quotes... But My only problem with you, and its not really a problem, more of wish that you would maybe hold more credence to your actual experiences... You quote stuff but it seems its just a bunch of pretty words.. like you don't actual understand it.. (not saying you don't) but you don't relate it to life.. or how you incorporate your learnings into life..
Originally posted by dnero6911using the old texts as a means to explain anything isn't explaining anything new.. or better... thats the problem. We as the 'new' thinkers need to explain it to the new thinkers in a way that relates to their experiences.. I dunno anymore man.. blah