It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by chinawhite
That was the plan . Im not to sure of your knowledge of the korean war so ill fill you in. MacArthur was planning to put 14 nukes on the chinese border filled with colbalt so the chinese infantry couldn't go over the mountain.
The amount of munitions the indian planes could ahve dropped per day
Its all about the terrain in this case. In the open moving troops are vulnearble as hell.
The agreement with britain and tibet was illegal as my post above stated.
And could you provide those international maps or understanding?
And if these lands were in indian control why was the need for forward deployment that nehru implmented?. Or how about that massive freeway passing though askin chin that india only knew about after it was actually built?. Good administering.
Your lack of understanding about this issue is quite laughble. Not to offend but the land rights issues with askin chin and AP should be common knowledge to anyone which sudies the border conflict
Here is a brieft summary
India claims Askin chin and AP
China claims Askin chin and AP or NEFA
China was willing to give up its claim to NEFA if india gave up its claim for Askin chin. Chinese forces went out of the NEFA as a gesture of good will to india so india would go back to the negotiating table
Originally posted by yuanshao101
I was, not making a point of the USA against the world, I was just mearly pointing out the fact that alot of my fellow americans seem to always rekon that when the age old argument of Britain vs USA, we would just steam roll over the United Kingdom, in my opinion that is what would happen if we tried . . . .
As to the IC argument, the factories are already there, for everything except Military uses, then again how do we know the chinese are not rolling out 100 tanks a day ???,
Originally posted by rogue1
Originally posted by yuanshao101
I was, not making a point of the USA against the world, I was just mearly pointing out the fact that alot of my fellow americans seem to always rekon that when the age old argument of Britain vs USA, we would just steam roll over the United Kingdom, in my opinion that is what would happen if we tried . . . .
Hmm between just the US and and the UK, they probably would steam roller over them, no doubt. I suggest you do a little more reading on teh order of battles and weapons both sides employ.
As to the IC argument, the factories are already there, for everything except Military uses, then again how do we know the chinese are not rolling out 100 tanks a day ???,
You can't prodice guns from a factory which makes shoes or TV's, teh factory has to be completely retooled. I assume the US with it's 100+ military surveillance factories know lmost exactly what is coming out of Chinese factories. It's not that hard.
Originally posted by yuanshao101
are you chinese ???
if not and you happen to be American, how many times do I have to say we are NOT invincible, our army, really isn't up to a standard of some other nations, mainly the Europeans. People were saying, that we would roll over the British Isles, so I made my opinion on what would happen if we tried, it ISN'T FACT, nor is it based entirely on facts, but I am sure quite a few other people would agree with me when I say the British would hammer us, maybe not on their own, but with their political out reach and support for our nation already at nothing they would easily repel us ??
I LOVE MY COUNTRY just as much as the next man, but seriously dude you need to open your eyes the United States are not the best army in the world, sure we are the most powefull in terms of firepower but in terms of actually battlefield, man to man we arn't all that good compare to other nations,
Originally posted by yuanshao101
and where do you get your crap about the US military being the Most sophisticated ?? we are the most powerful because of the sheer weight of weapons we can put forth into a battle zone, don't forget the British and us pretty much share technology so we are about equal, only difference is they have a 10th of what we have in terms of man power and have noware near the same equipment numbers.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
Cobalt nukes?
Dream on.. and don't forget to gloat while you're at it..
Which is how much? I don't want sentence reconstructions. You said that they would dropped less per soldier than what was dropped in Korea. Prove it.
Kashmir is in India's control. No forward deployment there?
The international maps are those printed by the allies post WWII and post Indian Independance. Both Aksai Chin and NEFA as you call it were shown as a part of India.
If you can see the aksai chin border was decided AFTER 1962. Before that it was a part of India but it wasn't administered by India.
It was DEFEINITELY not with China.
AP was with India all along.
For the first two decades after the Simla Conference, the Survey of India did not show the McMahon Line as the border between British India and Tibet either; only in 1937 did they publish a map showing it as the official boundary; in 1938 the Survey of India published a map showing Tawang as a part of Tibet. In 1944, Britain established administrations in the area, from Dirang Dzong in the west to Walong in the east. The situation developed further as India became independent and the People's Republic of China was established in the late 1940s: with the PRC poised to take over Tibet, India unilaterally declared the McMahon Line to be the boundary in November 1950, and forced the Tibetan administration out of the Tawang area in 1951, despite Tibetan and PRC protests
Lack of understanding?
Do you know that the post 62 era (until this millenium) was a total freeze in Indo-China relations?What negotiating table?
Originally posted by chinawhite
Its the truth isn't it
You asked a question and i gave you an answer. Or do you wish to deny it?
You can do the maths
The amount of indian planes that could be deployed againest roughly 200,000+ chinese soldiers. Compared with the US airforce againest (you can subsitute the figure you came up with) and you get a grand sum of more tons per soldier from the US airforce than india could have provided
And how about the areas under pakistani control or chinese control?. Do you even know what forward deployment policy is/was?
Allies or the british?
China was one of the big four countries and would never have agreed to that map. The KMT government in china still claims outer mongolia
Are you aware how this war even started?. The indian military attacked the chinese forces in askin chin that were building the highway which cuts askin chin in half. It was in chinese control and not indian because they didn't even have a clue about a 1000 mile highway crossing right though "their" terrioty
For the first two decades after the Simla Conference, the Survey of India did not show the McMahon Line as the border between British India and Tibet either; only in 1937 did they publish a map showing it as the official boundary; in 1938 the Survey of India published a map showing Tawang as a part of Tibet. In 1944, Britain established administrations in the area, from Dirang Dzong in the west to Walong in the east. The situation developed further as India became independent and the People's Republic of China was established in the late 1940s: with the PRC poised to take over Tibet, India unilaterally declared the McMahon Line to be the boundary in November 1950, and forced the Tibetan administration out of the Tawang area in 1951, despite Tibetan and PRC protests
en.wikipedia.org...
I mean lack of knowledge
I never said they did negotiate but the chinese pulled back as a gesture of goodwill so india might accept it
Originally posted by yuanshao101
Once again your talking about pwer and how we rock, when u just contradicted your self with ur sentence about tomahawks, your not arguing any case, your just saying what I stated in the last sentence that we have more tomahawks than they do ?? whic his what I said, but then again their challenger easily hammers our M1A variations ??
So we and the brits goto war, they then simply take over and annex our many many RADOMES etc ?? aswell as the coulpe of Airfields we use ??? so now they have the intelligence capabilities that we do, except for the fact that theirs is already alot better than ours lol.
dude sont just keep statign that we have more weapons BECAUSE NO ONE IS DENYING THAT, but dont go on about how we own them with all over technology owning there and then say something stupid like "but we have more tomahawks than then" lol.
Originally posted by st3ve_o
3) typhoon vs f-22, theres many websites comparing these 2 aircraft, whilst i agree the f-22 is probably better - the typhoon is 4 times cheaper than the f-22 and the typhoon can do 90% of what the raptor can do.
Originally posted by White Chapel
Once again I ask, who cares about cost? Cost is irrelevent on the battlefield, it either works or it doesn't. No one ever won a battle because of the cost of their equipment.
Originally posted by st3ve_o
3) typhoon vs f-22, theres many websites comparing these 2 aircraft, whilst i agree the f-22 is probably better - the typhoon is 4 times cheaper than the f-22 and the typhoon can do 90% of what the raptor can do.
4) after next year the US won't have the greatest warship when the first of the type45's are launched.
5) astute class submarines, id bet this sub can rival any the US have, ive done some reading up about this and bae say the astute class subs are "more complex than a space shuttle".
6) we've got 2 new carriers in development, also which websites tell me is the most 'advanced' carriers ever built.
8) the challenger2 tanks, many people say its either the british challenger2 tanks or german leopard which is the worlds best 'allround' tank.
10) special forces - SAS, most high profile forces unit in the world
(summary) us brits have everything, the only thing we lack is 'numbers' compared to america, which we now do not need now since the british empire ended 60 years ago...never the less no country as a better military record than ours (70 years ago we owned 25% of the world)!!
over the years our puny island as kicked/and still kicks (falklands) some major arse
Originally posted by st3ve_o
yeah but it can still do just about everything the f-22 can do!!
besides i can argue the fact that the raptor is 'unproven'.
in dog-fights there's been articles about how the two f-15's figher jets were chasing the typhoon in a 'mock' dogfight,
the typhoon suprised both american piots, managed to outmanoeuvr both and get into a shooting position!!
Originally posted by rogue1
The typhoon is incomparable with an F-22. It doesn't even rate.
Well that's really debatle especially since it uses an inferior mechanical radar rather than the much more advanced phased arrays, used on American ships.
It is still inferior to a Virginia class sub and probably a Seawolf Class.
The us also has a new carrier in development.
Some people say it isn't Considering the Leopard 2 of CHallenger have never really seen combat, it's pretty silly to use inuendo.
Erm yes, tehy are, seems every second SAS trooper writes a book. However the best units ar ethose which keep a low profile. US Delta and SEALS are easily just as capable as the Brit SAS, although inferior to the Australian SASR.
LOL, if you say so. The difference is now, one mistake and its all over the news, back in teh days of British military power, they could massacre people wihtout any public scrutiny. Just look at the British handling of WW1, completely woeful, tehn of course there's Singapore in WW@, lol. Cone t think of it, it's the former colonial troops which saved your bacon many times ie, the Australians at Tobruk.
LOL, you're lucky teh Argies dropped so many incorectly fused bombs on their A-4's otherwise half the British fleet would have been sunk. I think they had more strikes with dummy bombs than properly fused ones.
And since when has the Typhoon been proven. If it had been a real dogfight the F-15's would hvae used missiles and blown it away. I find this story fancifiul at best.