It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by princeea
Sites down, can someone post the vids? Trying again later...
Edit: links are broken
[edit on 10-1-2006 by princeea]
August 1678, Hertfordshire. A pamphlet describing an unusual luminous phenomenon seen in a field. The next day circles were found cut into the crop. Is this a 17th century prankster, an act of revenge on a farmer or an ancient crop circle account?informantnews.com
Originally posted by Unplugged
As for the age of this phenomenon, the olders crop circle I know of is from 1678.
Originally posted by Hvitserk
a lot of circles are definitely hoaxes , and these are usually easy to spot , not because of their patterns, but of other factors like the pressure that had to be applied on the stalks or bent stalks, em signatures etc etc... you just can't apply enough pressure with a board and your body weight to achieve some of the results seen. Machines ? ok why not, but why haven't the hoaxers come out with them yet and debunked all of it ?
Just like with the UFO phenomenon, a lot of BS and a minority of yet unexplainable events.Does it prove it has an extra-terrestrial origin ? Definitely not. Has any of us the possibility to prove that 100% of these circles are hoaxes ? Definitely not .
Originally posted by BlackGuardXIII
I could not find any percentages of hoaxes to real ones, but it appears that hoaxes make up a small percentage of total circles. And 25 people have claimed to be witnesses to the formation of real ones. I was going to post a load of links that give lots of good information on the differences between hoaxes and real ones, and the reasons why it is nearly impossible that hoaxers are creating some of the more complex ones.
But.... instead of links, this is all you get.
Go to dogpile dot com and enter 'crop circle hoax' and you'll get more information than you want.
paranormal.about.com...
there is a good site with a lot of good information about "real" crop cirlces
Originally posted by bpletcj
I can't get you link to work.
Originally posted by sanctum
Originally posted by bpletcj
I can't get you link to work.
It works ok for me, bpletc.
Originally posted by Frosty
These must have been done by an alien right?
By 1988, hundreds of crop circles had been documented and researched. And every year they had grown exponentially, always developing and splitting in structure as if suggesting some sort of language, more complex as the years progressed and at the pace in which the research teams picked up on the subtle clues left on the fields. Circles developed a simple ring, then double rings. Then Celtic crosses, where the four 'satellite' circles were connected by a thin band, too narrow even for a small child to thread without disturbing the crop. In 1988, during a BBC interview inside a new formation, the cricket-like warble that had been heard several times throughout the years was captured on tape. Eventually analyzed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, it was measured as 100 bpm, at a frequency of 5.2kHz, and mechanical in nature. A bird or insect was also out of the question.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
As our planet struggles to find an answer to crop circles, back in 1972 and 1977 our planet had sent out equally similar messages to the stars. One day in the very far future, when the message bearing spacecraft crash lands onto a planet, its metal structures corroded, perhaps some intelligent lifeform will stumble upon the gold plaques or gold discs, and wonder if it was the work of some local 'alien' schoolkid's joke.
Earth's messages to other intelligent lifeform
Originally posted by Hvitserkfactors like the pressure
em signatures
come out with them yet and debunked all of it ?
Just like with the UFO phenomenon, a lot of BS and a minority of yet unexplainable events.Does it prove it has an extra-terrestrial origin ? Definitely not. Has any of us the possibility to prove that 100% of these circles are hoaxes ? Definitely not .
Originally posted by Implosion
Originally posted by Frosty
I fail to see how a couple of blokes armed with a plank did that in one night.
Fail to see? How much manual labor have you done in your lifetime? Planning out these operation to a t can make it avery simple process compared to what you are thinking.
If you have a look around that site, you will find all sorts of crazy information encoded into crop formations.
Never found anything out of the ordinary.
By 1988, hundreds of crop circles had been documented and researched. And every year they had grown exponentially, always developing and splitting in structure as if suggesting some sort of language, more complex as the years progressed and at the pace in which the research teams picked up on the subtle clues left on the fields. Circles developed a simple ring, then double rings. Then Celtic crosses, where the four 'satellite' circles were connected by a thin band, too narrow even for a small child to thread without disturbing the crop. In 1988, during a BBC interview inside a new formation, the cricket-like warble that had been heard several times throughout the years was captured on tape. Eventually analyzed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, it was measured as 100 bpm, at a frequency of 5.2kHz, and mechanical in nature. A bird or insect was also out of the question.
What is meant by exponentialy, where is there information to suggest this? What suggest crop circles as a language or suggesting they are growing complex, where are those numbers a+bi? Maybe the people making these circles became better at what they were doin - Criminals and artist alike have a habit of doing this. What does 'anyalzed by NASA's JPL' mean? Do you know what they were anaylzing?
Why would NASA analyse something connected to a bunch of circles made by two blokes and a plank?
That is irrelevant. You are attepmting to use a government agencies actions as a basis for the validity of your arguement? Proof by funding: Afterall, how could a government agency be wrong?
I'm forced to concur with stumason. Sure there are some hoaxes out there, including some high profile advertising projects [which BTW are underwhelming alongside the real thing]. But there is no way, that all crop circles are man made IMO.
How are you able to distinguish between hoaxes? Why do the characteristics of hoaxes not comply with characteristics of what you would call 'genuine'? EM signatures? Honestly, give me a credible explanation of how this allows for any margin of the existence of off-worlder design., Why? Because you do not know what an EM signature is or how to replicate it therefore it is work of an off-worlder, that what you mean? you are calus like my big toe.