It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by deaf fences hit
it's conditioned in a way that there appear to be SET choices that we HAVE to make,
Originally posted by deaf fences hit
and that violates the term free will.
Originally posted by deaf fences hit
freedom entitles the ability to not only choose from anothers proposed condition, but to also ignore it and/or create choices of ones own will, if need be.
Originally posted by saint4God
When you said you had a walk with God, could you be more specific?
Also, could you give a little background to how you've come to believe?
This does tie into free will, because I think foundationally it's important when discussing how we come to believe whether or not we have it. queenannie seems to think we do not have free will as well, but I'm wondering if we're saying the same thing but getting tangled up in the definition...
Originally posted by they see ALL
think of it like this:
the teacher (God) tells you to do an optional asignment (in our case, the asignment will represent acting good and following the 10 commandments and all that)...
the teacher says, if you do it, you will get points (by going to heaven, in our case)...
if we don't do it, we do not get points (in our case, by going to hell)...
so, we are forced to do it...
in other words, God tells us to act good (and this is optional) and if we act good, we go to heaven, and if we don't, we go to hell...
even though its optional, we must do it to go to heaven...
Ever heard the phrase: "Still on the fence, I see", or "Still haven't picked which side of the fence you are on?"
Please answer me this,if we need to accept this jesus and live by these given bounderies of "good" or burn in hell for eternity what happens to people who lived before him and those right up to the present day who haven't heard of him,or who haven't been taught these bounderies of behaviour do they get a free pass or is it straight to hell?
Awesome sig!
"Liberate the minds of men and ultimately you will liberate the bodies of men."
Originally posted by saint4God
This does tie into free will, because I think foundationally it's important when discussing how we come to believe whether or not we have it. queenannie seems to think we do not have free will as well, but I'm wondering if we're saying the same thing but getting tangled up in the definition...
I know exactly what you mean--but you certainly expressed them well--something that doesn't always come by default with the experience.
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
I thank you Queenannie for the kind words, but again ...... I do not claim to be the only author of those words.
Exactly.
How can I utilize my "gift" of free will to be seperate from that which is omnipotent?
I think that all three 'minds'--conscious and it's 'sub' and 'super' partners must somehow be bound tightly in the end--just as Daniel's 3 comrades were bound when they were cast into the 'furnace of affliction.'
Perhaps the subconscious mind is noncompatible with the conscious mind if the conscious mind does not believe in an omnipotent GOD. Perhaps the subconscious mind is where the keys are.
Originally posted by queenannie38
Now, don't take that as me saying I don't believe in God--the God of Israel that created us all, that sent His Anointed to free the captives in the Last Year of Jubilee--I not only believe, I know* God is real--like Esoteric Teacher, I have experienced walking with God, and it is not something possible to describe to another who has not yet done so--all that can be done is to demonstrate personal integrity as support for telling whomever asks that yes, it is possible and it is the destiny of all souls. The rest is up to God, and you--but it's more about consciousness than it is boundaries and dogma--for the only hard and fast rule is LOVE--the love of God, each other, and of Truth.
*(this 'knowing' is a personal knowing, but nonetheless just as valid for me as is knowing that the curtain beside me is a lovely apple green color. Both of those 'knowings' I cannot prove to you--even if I sent a pic of the curtain, how can you really know that it is the same one that now hangs in the window to my left?)
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
If GOD is not omnipotent, then GOD is not GOD.
If GOD is not within me, then GOD is not omnipotent.
If GOD is omnipotent, then GOD is within me.
Originally posted by queenannie38
Saint4God~this thread has had me thinking a lot,
Originally posted by queenannie38
and especially your post. I think you are right, in the sense that some of the discrepancies arise from semantics (as is always the case!).
Originally posted by Ras Dedan
God has told no one anything
Originally posted by Ras Dedan
I also believe in God,my concept of God is far removed from that of christianity but I'm not trying to knock people's beliefs,my personal belief is no more or less valid than that of anyone elses.
My own interpretation of heaven/hell is they are states of living right here on earth and therefore also states of mind,loss of connection to the spiritual aspect of our nature which I percieve to be the manifestation of God and by extension the failure to see the divine in others and nature brings about a mindset focused solely upon base physical needs and materialism.
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
If GOD is not omnipotent, then GOD is not GOD.
If GOD is not within me, then GOD is not omnipotent.
If GOD is omnipotent, then GOD is within me.
How can you know whether God is omnipotent or not ?
A favourite one that atheists will throw at this claim is,is it possible for God to create a stone too heavy for God to lift?
This concept of being omnipotent,omniscient etc are the same as saying God is good and merciful.The concepts of goodness and mercy spring from the minds of man and are attributed to God by man based on what they imagine God to be.
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by Ras Dedan
God has told no one anything
This I'll disagree on. He has told me things. All of which parallel what has been said before in the Record as well as others who live in the same light. I can say that before I took a step towards Him though, He did not tell me anything. Rightly so I think, I didn't care enough about Him to accept anything He had to say anyway.
Originally posted by Ras Dedan
Very interesting and please excuse my scepticism but I'm extremely doubtful of the factual basis of this statement
Originally posted by Ras Dedan
and it's entirely unprovable one way or the other.
Originally posted by Ras Dedan
I can accept the concept as stated above that our conscience etc are derived from God,conscience is something that is universal within man,but God actually telling us things if we accept HIM is another matter.
Originally posted by Ras Dedan
Again your reasoning gets back to God only accepting people who approach through this Roman ideology,which in terms of human history is relatively new,everyone else can go by the wayside.
Originally posted by Ras Dedan
If God is so strict about the acceptable way of worship we should have had this set out from the start instead of waiting till a mere 2,000 years ago or is it just that the rules were changed at that point.
Originally posted by Ras Dedan
The usage of male pronouns He and Him is also interesting,God is definitely male then? HE is all these otherwordly things but HE is also bound by gender ?
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
To help people stay on their own path will eventually lead them to themselves, which is what they are looking for to begin with. Do not try to make them deviate from that path. Instead, help them:
Ask a logical question
Get a logical answer
Ask the next logical question
Get a logical answer
Ask the next logical question
..... and so on and so forth, until ....
The last logical question
How can you know whether God is omnipotent or not ?
By the definition of what GOD is. If GOD isn't all knowing, then how can it be GOD? If GOD is not omnipotent, then where is where GOD isn't?
Originally posted by saint4God
My experience may be unprovable, but that does not mean you cannot obtain your own proof that God exists.
Er, not what I'm saying. My concious has led me to things that were wrong, thank God He stopped it. Hard to explain, something that'd have to be experienced...
Candidly, I don't care what Roman ideology is. Sorry Rome...or Romans...or whoever I just offended...
It's a growth experience that we had to go through as humanity. Looking at the Book on the whole, one can see the progression of thought and can understand why in the beginning, with the way we were thinking/acting, we had to do things one way (which we constantly disobeyed), and now another. We went 'downhill' to such a point we needed a lift...and got it.
Originally posted by Ras Dedan
I'm not denying the existence of God just my doubts over actual communication,although I will say that while I do believe in God this does not and never will constitute proof of God's existence,proof is something you can hold in your hand or put in a jar,
Originally posted by Ras Dedan
I never be able to whip out my God jar and stun atheists into silence with it.
Originally posted by Ras Dedan
No,sorry for the confusion it's what I was saying previously about conscience.I could accept that as being interpreted as communication with God but other than that I don't follow.
Originally posted by Ras Dedan
The Roman ideology I refered to is christianity.
Originally posted by Ras Dedan
If you look around do you really see a great improvement in the thinking and actions of people.In all the countries that profess to live by the bible and whose societies are supposedly founded on it's teachings can you point out even one of them that has stood by these principles and is a shining example of this in action.
[i, you said:
I also believe in God,my concept of God is far removed from that of christianity but I'm not trying to knock people's beliefs,my personal belief is no more or less valid than that of anyone elses.
Yes—this are my understandings. ‘Consciousness’ in the sense of true unity with The Mind that created all things by thought and word—that was the ‘Garden.’ The snake is the ‘twisting leviathan’ in the earth—representing the state of fleshly mortal existence—earth is the realm of matter and time only exists within that realm, in a helical fashion that is perceived by mortals as linear—and that prison of perception is where we are bound as slaves to death—with no other perception available, we have no choice but to die.
you said:
therefore also states of mind,loss of connection to the spiritual aspect of our nature which I percieve to be the manifestation of God
Yes—that’s the knowledge of ‘evil’. Also—it’s definitely impossible to see the divine in others if we don’t first realize/acknowledge the divine in ourselves. Funny how Christianity won’t permit those who obey it to acknowledge that divine seed. It says it all throughout the bible! They say it is a sin to aspire to divinity—and so in damning restoration, they maintain the state of the fallen. As well—they think it is best to avoid the nature of ‘sin’—which is obviously the necessary first step toward divinity. IOW, the dark must be first in order for the illumination to be understood. Darkness cannot conquer light—but even the smallest light can overcome the darkest dark, by rendering it ‘not as dark.’ A bunch of little lights, and you’ve got a big light.
you then said:
by extension the failure to see the divine in others and nature brings about a mindset focused solely upon base physical needs and materialism
I understand what you are saying—and at best, many of the words that can best describe God have been bastardized by fakers and those who desire so bad they convince themselves—causing the world at large to misunderstand.
you then said:
This concept of being omnipotent,omniscient etc are the same as saying God is good and merciful.The concepts of goodness and mercy spring from the minds of man and are attributed to God by man based on what they imagine God to be.