Well we know Putins ICBMs won't fail in their silos

Kind of odd this game was just released called "ICBM Escalation"


All the warmongers pushing continued war and death are using Putin as a scapegoat for what they really want, which is to see more people die there, and also secretly hoping it turns nuclear. These warmongers and their cheerleader squads are also mostly left wing idealists and they often show that they really hate everything already, so that adds more evidence that they really want a nuclear holocaust since they already don't value life too much.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

I don't think anyone on here thinks that way.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

I don't think anyone on here thinks that way.

I think there's a few here who definitely do, only you don't know it, or see it.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

I haven't seen it. Can you give any examples?

a reply to: BedevereTheWise

Not all of them do. You do while saying you don't.

Joe Biden and his deep state controllers certainly do.

And many left wing idealists that cheerlead everything the Biden regime says and does certainly do, by constant escalation and zero compromise.

I think you might enjoy that new steam game that came out today.

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: BedevereTheWise

Not all of them do. You do while saying you don't.

Joe Biden and his deep state controllers certainly do.

And many left wing idealists that cheerlead everything the Biden regime says and does certainly do, by constant escalation and zero compromise.

I think you might enjoy that new steam game that came out today.

Really? You think I and others are all really in favour of nuclear war despite not saying anything like that.

But you know we really are because?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

I am awake. I see what is happening. You, again, want to argue the vehicle not the action. Can anyone name the last time two warring factions launched ICBM/IRBM during a conflict? Anyone?

You cannot because it has NEVER happened.

The US has no Executive Branch right now. It does not exist. We are vulnerable and Russia is sending ballistic missiles into Ukraine.

a reply to: matafuchs

WW2? V2's?

BEFORE YOU POST.
READ THIS....

Important if Actively Posting

Be the Change you Wish to see... Redux





Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (Redux)

Community Announcement re: Decorum




These rules apply to all threads and if you want to engage in personal attacks there are other sites on the Internet where you can do that. Our goal is for ATS to be above that. For members here to post like mature adults.


To repeat, those who refuse to "get it" WILL face LENGTHY POSTING BANS!!
YOU are responsible for your own posts





And, as always...
Do not reply to this post.

I've got 2 questions

1 Why no pictures of mass destruction from this new missile you would think Putin would be promoting them.

2 Why no news of Ukraine using long range missiles other than the few that have done no damage.

The V2? Yes. A guided 'rocket' but it is not the same as this. I understand the reach, and I get it, but the great-grandpappy of the current ICBM is not the same.

This was a warning to let everyone know that they are serious. I would take this as serious. You have the US providing the Ukraine with weapons they should not be providing.

We do not need a new global conflict and I could care less about the welfare of Ukraine. It is not the US.

a reply to: matafuchs

An IRBM, actually. And it happened.

Yes, it was a warning. Or, a bluff?

Would you have cared about the welfare of, say, the UK, in WW2, because it is not the US?

Nobody I know wants another global conflict.

The only State threatening it, is Russia.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

You, again, want to argue the vehicle not the action. Can anyone name the last time two warring factions launched ICBM/IRBM during a conflict? Anyone?

I already said IRBM but again, it is a missile attack. This is not an IED. A drone. Some BS 'rockets' from the Houthis.

Russia is not threatening me or the US? It is not threatening the UK. It is in a local conflict with a state that separated that they have been fighting with for decades.

Asking about the welfare of the UK in WW2 is not even close.

a reply to: matafuchs

Russia has been launching missiles at Ukraine for nearly 3 years now.

And yes, Russia has threatened the UK with nukes.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Nobody I know wants another global conflict. The only State threatening it, is Russia.

So do you think by the UK and the US supplying missiles to Ukraine that it isn’t escalating the possibility of a global conflict?
If I were to guess, I’m about 100% positive that Putin perceives that as a escalating threat to Russia’s well being.

a reply to: KrustyKrab

Do you imagine Russia acquiring the likes of attack drones, artillery shells, and ballistic missiles from North Korea and Iran bodes any better regarding escalating the possibility of a global conflict?

a reply to: KrustyKrab

Global conflict = WW3=M.A.D.

Would Putin want that, what with Trump imminent?

a reply to: Ravenwatcher

Why no pictures of mass destruction from this new missile you would think Putin would be promoting them.

That strike was not intended to create mass destruction, it was a warning to everyone involved to stop what they’re doing.

I don’t want to see Russia continue with impunity but it’s time that calmer heads prevail and have a chat. Part of the problem is we currently have no one competent enough to do that. VP is on vacation and well….biden’s brain has been on vacation for years now, neither one of them competent. So, I’m not sure which one of this administrations flunkies are capable of negotiating anything between U and R. Blinken and Austin are certainly not up to the task.