Well we know Putins ICBMs won't fail in their silos

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Yes. So where is this official policy?

a reply to: Boomer1947

That's important because as soon as the US sees the silo covers being opened in the Russian missile fields, we go to high alert and assume that a missile could be coming our way.

I don’t think it would go down the way you think it would. Russia has the second largest submarine fleet in the world. They have a total of 66 submarines, which includes 12 ballistic missile submarines, 10 cruise missile submarines, 14 nuclear attack submarines, 22 diesel attack submarines, and eight special-purpose submarines. They’re are a total of 640 nuclear missiles on those subs and I guarantee you some of them are parked not far from US soil. And don’t forget about their Bombers that carry nukes. They don’t have to open a single silo door to end the world.

a reply to: YouSir

You still don't seem to grasp the concept of M.A.D.

I just hope and pray that your pal Putin does.

a reply to: KrustyKrab

Bombers?

The turboprop Bears?

originally posted by: YouSir

Ummm...you really need to broaden your horizons...

YouSir

Linky then?? Instead of being snarky.

originally posted by: Ravenwatcher
a reply to: KrustyKrab

He won't have a home or arse if he decides to play big boy games, I'm sure he knows this.

Oh yeah? Who’s going to fire the first nuke at Russia? Whoever does is getting wiped off the planet too. So tell me who’s willing to take that chance? Russia has the largest nuclear arsenal in the world and more than capable of delivering whatever wherever.

May I recommend watching the film, The Bedford Incident, in these times of heightened nuclear fear?

www.imdb.com...

originally posted by: KrustyKrab

originally posted by: Ravenwatcher
a reply to: KrustyKrab

He won't have a home or arse if he decides to play big boy games, I'm sure he knows this.

Oh yeah? Who’s going to fire the first nuke at Russia? Whoever does is getting wiped off the planet too. So tell me who’s willing to take that chance? Russia has the largest nuclear arsenal in the world and more than capable of delivering whatever wherever.

Pay attention If HE decides to play big boy games and HE Fires the 1st shot HE will be wiped off the planet by every NATO country with Nukes .. Hope that's clear now

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
May I recommend watching the film, The Bedford Incident, in these times of heightened nuclear fear?

www.imdb.com...

Ummm...I much prefer..."On the Beach"...by Nevil Shute...


Even the Newer rendition...



YouSir

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: KrustyKrab

Bombers?

The turboprop Bears?

Oh they have plenty of TU95’s/Bears to do the job but I’m not seeing any props on their TU160.

a reply to: KrustyKrab

Plenty of non stealthy Blackjack B1 knock offs?

Whereas the US has very stealthy B2s.

originally posted by: matafuchs
In 2021 there was a huge build up. Everyone said not to worry. They invaded. They want to occupy not destroy. This is why you are seeing the warfare you are.

For them to launch this, they are warning that they have the capability. This is a warning and it should be heeded.

Looking, Putin said it was not hypersonic and no one but this guy from Norway has said it was armed with MIRV. There was also 7 missiles fired in the same area with 6 different than this test one. It is also said it was a knockoff of another one that could carry 4 warheads of the tactical nuke size.

originally posted by: Ravenwatcher

originally posted by: KrustyKrab

originally posted by: Ravenwatcher
a reply to: KrustyKrab

He won't have a home or arse if he decides to play big boy games, I'm sure he knows this.

Oh yeah? Who’s going to fire the first nuke at Russia? Whoever does is getting wiped off the planet too. So tell me who’s willing to take that chance? Russia has the largest nuclear arsenal in the world and more than capable of delivering whatever wherever.

Pay attention If HE decides to play big boy games and HE Fires the 1st shot HE will be wiped off the planet by every NATO country with Nukes .. Hope that's clear now

Nah, I don’t think so. Do you really think the US or anyone else would launch nuclear missiles at Russia just because of Ukraine? Ukraine is not even a NATO member. I don’t even think the UN has the jurisdiction to intervene in a war between two non NATO countries, especially intervening with nukes. And again whoever did fire nukes at Russia is done. I can’t think of a single country willing to make that mistake, don’t forget about NK either, I’m sure they’d want to play ball too.

originally posted by: KrustyKrab

originally posted by: Ravenwatcher

originally posted by: KrustyKrab

originally posted by: Ravenwatcher
a reply to: KrustyKrab

He won't have a home or arse if he decides to play big boy games, I'm sure he knows this.

Oh yeah? Who’s going to fire the first nuke at Russia? Whoever does is getting wiped off the planet too. So tell me who’s willing to take that chance? Russia has the largest nuclear arsenal in the world and more than capable of delivering whatever wherever.

Pay attention If HE decides to play big boy games and HE Fires the 1st shot HE will be wiped off the planet by every NATO country with Nukes .. Hope that's clear now

Nah, I don’t think so. Do you really think the US or anyone else would launch nuclear missiles at Russia just because of Ukraine? Ukraine is not even a NATO member. I don’t even think the UN has the jurisdiction to intervene in a war between two non NATO countries, especially intervening with nukes. And again whoever did fire nukes at Russia is done. I can’t think of a single country willing to make that mistake, don’t forget about NK either, I’m sure they’d want to play ball too.

Not sure what the reaction would be if he Nuked Ukraine, But he has been threatening anyone that supplied Ukraine with long range missiles my comment was more to the fact that if he decided to nuke a Nato member

I don’t know guys/gals, but I’m pretty sure if Biden keeps playing stupid games, DC is first to get hit, and probably not by a nuke either. Cutting the head off the proverbial snake in Putins thoughts. I wonder how many subs are off the east coast waiting.

Damn it man, these jokers need to knock it off.

originally posted by: Ravenwatcher

originally posted by: KrustyKrab

originally posted by: Ravenwatcher

originally posted by: KrustyKrab

originally posted by: Ravenwatcher
a reply to: KrustyKrab

He won't have a home or arse if he decides to play big boy games, I'm sure he knows this.

Oh yeah? Who’s going to fire the first nuke at Russia? Whoever does is getting wiped off the planet too. So tell me who’s willing to take that chance? Russia has the largest nuclear arsenal in the world and more than capable of delivering whatever wherever.

Pay attention If HE decides to play big boy games and HE Fires the 1st shot HE will be wiped off the planet by every NATO country with Nukes .. Hope that's clear now

Nah, I don’t think so. Do you really think the US or anyone else would launch nuclear missiles at Russia just because of Ukraine? Ukraine is not even a NATO member. I don’t even think the UN has the jurisdiction to intervene in a war between two non NATO countries, especially intervening with nukes. And again whoever did fire nukes at Russia is done. I can’t think of a single country willing to make that mistake, don’t forget about NK either, I’m sure they’d want to play ball too.

Not sure what the reaction would be if he Nuked Ukraine, But he has been threatening anyone that supplied Ukraine with long range missiles my comment was more to the fact that if he decided to nuke a Nato member

If he nuked a NATO country that would be a game changer. I don’t think he’d be that reckless. SHTF if did. One thing Putin isn’t, is stupid. He’s a very intelligent and calculated person.

a reply to: KrustyKrab

Using a MIRV missile as a kinetic bombing platform is a new one though. In effect he had used the non nuclear ones to try and intimidate the west into surrendering. They were essentially as strong as bunker busters. All they rely on is speed and mass. No electronics necessary to evade interceptors. The impactors didnt even explode.

China has said to nto do it,and I imagine a weakened russia is just what CHina wants so they can get those yummy resources when they move in to prevent WW3. then the world will be Oh china..you're our hero!!! And then Xi will slowly weaken the rest of the world till they strike taiwan.

No one else looks at this as a warning shot?

originally posted by: matafuchs
No one else looks at this as a warning shot?

I do, I think that’s exactly what it was. I don’t think Putin is going to be playing much longer. This war is unwinnable for Ukraine. The more we meddle in it the worse it’s going to get for Ukraine. This administration and the UK did one of the stupidest moves ever by allowing rockets that could hit inside Russia. Biden is a absolute dumbarse in everything he does. Can’t wait till that senile puppet is out of office and all the top military brass that’s creating this mess is gone.

a reply to: yuppa

Using a MIRV missile as a kinetic bombing platform is a new one though. In effect he had used the non nuclear ones to try and intimidate the west into surrendering. They were essentially as strong as bunker busters. All they rely on is speed and mass. No electronics necessary to evade interceptors. The impactors didnt even explode.

They’re saying that the warheads were probably inert. I saw the damage to one of the buildings and it looked like something just blew right through the top. Mach 10 is no joke and no defense system they have is fast enough to stop them. Even if loaded with conventional warheads it’s going to be a game changer.