Well we know Putins ICBMs won't fail in their silos

originally posted by: KrustyKrab
a reply to: yuppa

Using a MIRV missile as a kinetic bombing platform is a new one though. In effect he had used the non nuclear ones to try and intimidate the west into surrendering. They were essentially as strong as bunker busters. All they rely on is speed and mass. No electronics necessary to evade interceptors. The impactors didnt even explode.

They’re saying that the warheads were probably inert. I saw the damage to one of the buildings and it looked like something just blew right through the top. Mach 10 is no joke and no defense system they have is fast enough to stop them. Even if loaded with conventional warheads it’s going to be a game changer.

No Im saying those are STRICTLY KINETIC WARHEADS on those missiles. They hit with the force of a bunker buster. And besides you hit those in SPACE in the boost phase when attacking a ICBM or similiar missile. Nuclear air defense missiles can destroy incoming warheads,but they also fry the area they defend if its too close to ground.

a reply to: yuppa

The damage patterns would seem to suggest a kinetic strike.

As to nuclear air defense missiles being able to destroy incoming warheads.

Yes, but only to the tune of around 10-20% or thereabouts if its a full-blown attack.

a reply to: putnam6

Just to add that ICBM was mounted to the back of a vehicle.

It was not in a silo per say.

Pro Zelensky/Bandera crowd underestimated Russia’s capabilities on strapping a washing machine to a ICBM that got punted into the atmosphere by a shovel.

a reply to: Imhere

Bandera is long dead. He only seems to be living on in your head.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

By the looks of it he owns beachfront property in said melon.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Imhere

Bandera is long dead. He only seems to be living on in your head.

Deflection.

Not shocking because you’re the one supporting the current regime in Kiev renaming streets to Bandera. and having statues propped all over in the nazi orgy sh*thole “Lviv”.

But nice try.

Anything to add on the ICBM strike?

Or are you going to continue to whimper about “mad Vlad ” ?

a reply to: Imhere

I take it you mean Kyiv.

As to the ICBM strike, what has that changed?

Not exactly having the desired effect methinks.

Aside from screaming desperation in spades.

a reply to: Imhere

Not taking your bait.

It wasn't an ICBM.

Do keep up.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Imhere

I take it you mean Kyiv.

As to the ICBM strike, what has that changed?

Not exactly having the desired effect methinks.

Aside from screaming desperation in spades.

It doesn’t matter what “methinks”

What matters is the whole world just watched the ICBM (IRBM) strike. Hence why you’re commenting in this thread lol

Seeing the arrival of what could be the equivalent of about 50 Hiroshima bombs in a relatively small area in seven seconds, definitely had some effect.


Didn’t you make some “ghost of Kyiv 8.0” hoax thread a couple days ago?

“Dramatic Moment Ukrainian Nursery Teacher Takes Out Russian Missile With Rocket Launcher” ? lmao

At least Carpy pointed out it was some bunk hoax story lol

originally posted by: Imhere

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Imhere

I take it you mean Kyiv.

As to the ICBM strike, what has that changed?

Not exactly having the desired effect methinks.

Aside from screaming desperation in spades.

It doesn’t matter what “methinks”

What matters is the whole world just watched the ICBM strike. Hence why you’re commenting in this thread lol

Seeing the arrival of what could be the equivalent of about 50 Hiroshima bombs in a relatively small area in seven seconds, definitely had some effect.


Didn’t you make some “ghost of Kyiv 8.0” hoax thread a couple days ago?

“Dramatic Moment Ukrainian Nursery Teacher Takes Out Russian Missile With Rocket Launcher” ? lmao

At least Carpy pointed out it was some bunk hoax story lol

Yes a stunning demonstration of decades old technology that everyone already knew Russia had.

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: Imhere

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Imhere

I take it you mean Kyiv.

As to the ICBM strike, what has that changed?

Not exactly having the desired effect methinks.

Aside from screaming desperation in spades.

It doesn’t matter what “methinks”

What matters is the whole world just watched the ICBM strike. Hence why you’re commenting in this thread lol

Seeing the arrival of what could be the equivalent of about 50 Hiroshima bombs in a relatively small area in seven seconds, definitely had some effect.


Didn’t you make some “ghost of Kyiv 8.0” hoax thread a couple days ago?

“Dramatic Moment Ukrainian Nursery Teacher Takes Out Russian Missile With Rocket Launcher” ? lmao

At least Carpy pointed out it was some bunk hoax story lol

Yes a stunning demonstration of decades old technology that everyone already knew Russia had.

Stunning that the Pro Zelensky crowd thought they wouldn’t work.

Btw, this is a new ballistic missile.

KYIV, Nov 21 (Reuters) - Russia fired a hypersonic intermediate-range ballistic missile at the Ukrainian city of Dnipro on Thursday in response to the U.S. and UK's allowing Kyiv to strike Russian territory with advanced Western weapons, in a further escalation of the 33-month-old war.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, in a televised address, said Moscow struck a Ukrainian military facility with a new medium-range, hypersonic ballistic missile known as "Oreshnik" (the hazel) and warned that more could follow. He said civilians would be warned ahead of further strikes with such weapons.

www.reuters.com...

a reply to: Imhere

Seen that before through haven't we.

As to the thread you have an issue with.

Not that you're on topic as usual, but i think you may find said thread appears to be in "mainstream news forum" and not the hoax bin.

Any other unfounded offtopic claims you had in mind?

Or is it just going to be more Bandera Bandera Bandera crap.

Next. LoL

a reply to: BedevereTheWise

Yep. It was an experimental version of an old IRBM that was apparently shelved in 2018.

Some more info here:

www.twz.com...

originally posted by: Imhere

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: Imhere

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Imhere

I take it you mean Kyiv.

As to the ICBM strike, what has that changed?

Not exactly having the desired effect methinks.

Aside from screaming desperation in spades.

It doesn’t matter what “methinks”

What matters is the whole world just watched the ICBM strike. Hence why you’re commenting in this thread lol

Seeing the arrival of what could be the equivalent of about 50 Hiroshima bombs in a relatively small area in seven seconds, definitely had some effect.


Didn’t you make some “ghost of Kyiv 8.0” hoax thread a couple days ago?

“Dramatic Moment Ukrainian Nursery Teacher Takes Out Russian Missile With Rocket Launcher” ? lmao

At least Carpy pointed out it was some bunk hoax story lol

Yes a stunning demonstration of decades old technology that everyone already knew Russia had.

Stunning that the Pro Zelensky crowd thought they wouldn’t work.

Btw, this is a new ballistic missile.

KYIV, Nov 21 (Reuters) - Russia fired a hypersonic intermediate-range ballistic missile at the Ukrainian city of Dnipro on Thursday in response to the U.S. and UK's allowing Kyiv to strike Russian territory with advanced Western weapons, in a further escalation of the 33-month-old war.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, in a televised address, said Moscow struck a Ukrainian military facility with a new medium-range, hypersonic ballistic missile known as "Oreshnik" (the hazel) and warned that more could follow. He said civilians would be warned ahead of further strikes with such weapons.

www.reuters.com...

New as in shorter ranged version of existing missile.

I don't think anyone has any doubt that Russia has advanced missiles. But much like their advanced planes and tanks it's there ability to mass produce or maintain them that is questionable.

a reply to: Imhere

"Seeing the arrival of what could be the equivalent of about 50 Hiroshima bombs in a relatively small area in seven seconds, definitely had some effect."

What effect has it had?

A MIRV re-entry was achieved and succeeded. if the warheads were active it would be glass. Some of you are arguing about the weapon. FFS.

Wake up peeps. If you think the global cabal will not level a city you have already forgotten COVID.

originally posted by: Imhere


Not shocking because you’re the one supporting the current regime in Kiev renaming streets to Bandera. and having statues propped all over in the nazi orgy sh*thole “Lviv”.

But nice try.

Are we back to Nazis again

a reply to: matafuchs

If.

And if that had happened there would be dire consequences, not least from the radiation that does not respect borders.

You are talking about strategic nukes not tactical ones.

Wake up yourself.

originally posted by: matafuchs
A MIRV re-entry was achieved and succeeded. if the warheads were active it would be glass.

Wake up peeps.

This isn't new... They have had this for a good while now and why Trump dropped out of the treaty in 2019 since they never stopped testing missiles in the 400 to 3500 mile range as the treaty prevented.