It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Lazy88
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Lazy88
originally posted by: chr0naut
If debt can be slowed and GDP continue to rise, the economic outcome will improve.
One problem. There is interest on the national debt where there is still borrowing.
Interest payments on the national debt top $1 trillion as deficit swells
www.cnbc.com...
Where inflation needs to be reigned in.
Inflation is necessary for growth, but if you do not limit inflation to a reasonable rate, then things fall apart.
How is inflation above 3 percent signs of a healthy economy?
What are you, like 12 years old.
originally posted by: Lazy88
originally posted by: chr0naut
The downturn in the US economy clearly began before Trump had left office.
You mean the lockdowns because of Covid, with democrat lead states and cities having some of the most stringent lockdowns and restrictions who could work. And what could be produced.
originally posted by: Cracka
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: tjack
Nobody is above the law amirite?
Not even the President elect.
And any attempt to pardon themselves is corruption, pure and simple.
if you wish to comment on US things, you might want to educate yourself on US things. Like the Constitution. Start with finding the part where a president can't pardon himself and go from there.
Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 places the President above the law. It is political corruption written into the US Constitution from the get-go.
Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 also contradicts the Presidential pledge of office, and Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution.
Even under Article II, Section 2, Clause 1, the President cannot grant any pardon without the specific written advice of the principal officers of the executive departments. Nor can the President pardon themselves from an impeachment.
Presidential pardons dilute the balance of the judicial branch to make lawful judgement and that of Congress to enact binding laws.
Yep, so if need be, Trump can pardon himself. Now you might start to grasp this.
But if some other political leader had committed crimes, and then pardoned themselves through political power and influence, would that mean that they didn't commit those crimes?
I mean, what's to stop someone in that position from lying, cheating, stealing, murder, and etc, then they just say, nah, I'm all good, I pardon myself. Do you think that isn't obvious corruption?
Impeachment would stop them. You would also need to CONVICT them during the impeachment.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: hangedman13
a reply to: chr0naut
All of your comparisons are just junk about the US election system. The US is made up of different states, or mini countries if you will. All with different values and population size. We use the electoral college to try and migrate large population centers drowning out the outlying areas. For instance NY went mostly red except for NYC, Albany and a few other counties. First blush because Kamala won the state was that she strongly won it. Not quite. But in NY it is winner take all. So she got those votes from the electoral college. But even in allegedly blue NY she was not that popular.
Read the Federalist Papers 54ā55. The Electoral College mechanism had its genesis in the 3/5ths compromise and slavery. It's still in the Constitution:
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.
No it isn't "still in the Constitution".š You've been pressing this for a few weeks now and sneak it in when ever you can. š And you never did show any examples of where it is still used.
In the United States Constitution, the Three-fifths Compromise is part of Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3. Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment (1868) later superseded this clause and explicitly repealed the compromise.
Three-fifths Compromise
originally posted by: chr0naut
Did you know that the US has been through stuff like wars and other pandemics before the COVID pandemic?
originally posted by: chr0naut
Did you know that Trump's lawyers in 2020 tried arguing that the 3/5ths compromised referred to undocumented entrants to the US, because they were 'other people'.
originally posted by: chr0naut
Of course, Trump's lawyers lost, but it indicates that the clause has NOT been rescinded and is still in legal statute, poisoning US law.
Trump's top contender for head of the CIA, Kash Patel:
-Wants to implement a 24/7 declassification office releasing files about JFK and 9/11.
-On day one, he wants to bring out Jeffrey Epstein's black book of names that were being blackmailed.
-He wants to bring out all the Russia Gate files that are hidden and expose the truth about the January 6th pipe bomber.
-He told Steve Bannon he wanted to exact justice and find the conspirators in the government and the media who worked to usurp the will of the people.
-He wants systematic change at the FBI and CIA coming from an awakened American people.
It's going to be an incredible four years, Patriots.