Abortion Funds Are In ‘A State Of Emergency’

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Trump has not been in office in almost 4 years. He is not responsible for what is happening now and yes, children at an alarming rate are being brought into the US.

That is for another thread. Maybe you can make one about pimping and raping.....

I'll also leave this right here. Close the thread....

Link

You to can find someone to fund your abortion

Link

a reply to: matafuchs

Trump has not been in office in almost 4 years.

Trump didn't fix anything at the border, when he was in office. His policies didn't protect anyone from human trafficking. So when Joe Biden revoked Trump's executive orders, He and Kamala weren't suddenly gleefully promoting children being trafficked and raped. So, supporting Kamala's Harris' election doesn't make anyone complicit and in support of human trafficking and child rape.

K?

And YES! Trump is absolutely responsible for the fact that women in the USA have lost a civil right. He campaigned on it, he selected judges that promised to revoke the right, and he bragged about having been responsible for it being revoked, and he's campaigning on that "win" again this time around. In the meantime, desperate women are dying and children are losing their mothers.

So, yeah. This is Trump. It's all Trump!

a reply to: Sookiechacha

NO civil right was lost. Please, show me where you have the right to an abortion. Because, if you can, and it IS a Civil Right it should be funded by the government.

RvW did not take away any rights. It simply gave the decision back to the states and if they want to allow and/or fund.

This argument is the same as legal weed. Federal government classifies it as illegal but I have a card in FL and can smoke all I want. Other states, I cannot.

It is not a civil right though. Neither is healthcare and the ACA.

Link

Congress is responsible for the border. If they would have allowed a wall and the ability to fund and update BP there wold be no issues but they did not, did they? That is for another thread though.....

a reply to: matafuchs

NO civil right was lost.

Yes, it was. This is history, Buddy. SC0TUS ruled, in Roe V Wade, that a woman's access to abortion was a civil right, protected under the 14th Amendment, based on the case before them. For 50 years, a woman's right to access abortion was a federally protected civil right, and that's why Roe had to go.

0nce Roe was overturned, and the civil right revoked, states' powers to regulate women's bodies became possible again, like it was pre-Roe. But, it wasn't possible as long as Roe stood.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude

are young women and children NOT being trafficked by the cartels due to the open border we currently have?

No. Pimps are not walking trafficked children across the border. Trump's "Stay in Mexico" policy didn't save any children from being raped for profit. Trump's Family/Child Separation policy didn't save any children from being raped and/or trafficked.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

this is a human issue and not a political one. When there is no place to put the kids you are about to pimp out, you are less likley to find places to put them until you can get them moved to the places they can be sold. One simple thing that, again, should be a human thing and not a political one, would help greatly, is if people were vetted BEFORE they are allowed entry into the US. I fully grasp that many want to come here. Of the asylum seekers, only a small percentage of them actually qualify for that status. So rather than allowing everyone to come in and wait years to ignore their court case, all while selling these kids, why not just follow the rules and laws we have on the bookd regarding the border? It secures our natoin, saves some kids from a horrific injustice, and keeps things orderly.

Is there a good answer for why we are doing things so backwards today?

a reply to: Sookiechacha

So, it went back to the states as it should have been all along. Second, it was never a civil right to begin with and the current SCOTUS decision corrected it.

Civil rights are personal rights that protect individuals from discrimination and ensure their participation in society. You do not need to have a choice to have an abortion to participate in society protected if it is not illegal.

This thread is about funding though. There are plenty of people out there willing to help people find a place to kill a child. Plenty. Because unless medically necessary to save the infant or mother it is the killing of child. THAT is choice people have to make and it is heart wrenching. A girl who se body count on Tik-Tok is 76 who lives in a state where it is banned. Could care less and should not be allowed in my opinion. It is birth control.

No one can tell a woman what to do with her body in the US unless it is female sports and then they are told to compete against men.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude

are young women and children NOT being trafficked by the cartels due to the open border we currently have?

No. Pimps are not walking trafficked children across the border. Trump's "Stay in Mexico" policy didn't save any children from being raped for profit. Trump's Family/Child Separation policy didn't save any children from being raped and/or trafficked.

That’s a lie as usual from you. This crap wasn’t happening under Trump, not even close to the level of this administration anyways. They absolutely are being trafficked through the border and sent to people who are pimping them out in the sex and labor trades, it’s a known fact you’re pretending doesn’t exist. That’s why kids are coming across with coded wrist bands it tells them where they need to go and money owed back to the cartel. Sad that you completely ignore facts from people like the CBP that have been shown to you. You don’t get to just continue lying and have it come true. Liberalism really is a mental health problem I guess.

a reply to: matafuchs

So, it went back to the states as it should have been all along.

Civil rights don't belong to the states.

This thread is about funding though.

Yep. There's an emergency, because women, in all stages of their pregnancies, are losing their lives and reproductive abilities, due to the loss of their civil rights and bad, ignorant, anti-women laws acorss the the country.

Charities are stepping up to try and get these women to safe states, where they can access the health care that they need.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Trump didn’t lose 100k kids that this administration has no clue where they’re at. Biden opened the border with open invitations to anyone that wants to come and they did by the millions. Remain in Mexico pretty much put a stop to that, the data doesn’t lie. Anyway I can’t with you anymore, it’s impossible to have a conversation with someone that keeps making up their own facts and completely ignores the true facts like you do.

a reply to: KrustyKrab

So, you think there are 10s of 1000s of young women and children being forced into rapey sex trafficking, because of an insecure border, but you want to make sure they don't get abortions when they get pregnant?

Is that right? That's what you're worried about, underage sex slaves getting abortions?

THE TITLE

Abortion Funds Are In ‘A State Of Emergency’

BEFORE YOU POST.
READ THIS....

Important if Actively Posting

Be the Change you Wish to see... Redux




These rules apply to all threads and if you want to engage in personal attacks there are other sites on the Internet where you can do that. Our goal is for ATS to be above that. For members here to post like mature adults.


To repeat, those who refuse to "get it" WILL face LENGTHY POSTING BANS!!
YOU are responsible for your own posts





And, as always...
Do not reply to this post.
Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (Redux)

edit on Fri Oct 18 2024 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Civil rights don't belong to the states.

You are talking about civil liberties not rights. Civil Rights are in place as to not allow discrimination. It has nothing to do with the right to have an abortion. It also does not apply to reproduction.

LGBT - Civil Rights
Have an Abortion - Not a Civil Right

Further, the OP is about funding. Good. Let private companies and Non-Profits raise money to help. It should not be Federally Funded and especially not with my tax dollars.

Those go to Civil Programs. Food. Shelter. Clothing. A new life. Not ending one.

Yep. There's an emergency, because women, in all stages of their pregnancies, are losing their lives and reproductive abilities, due to the loss of their civil rights and bad, ignorant, anti-women laws acorss the the country.

No.There is not. 1000's upon 1000's are not dying because of lack of funding. There were more abortions this year that before RvW was overturned.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: matafuchs

In the meantime, desperate women are dying and children are losing their mothers.

So, yeah. This is Trump. It's all Trump!

And the complacent people who are unwilling to donate to the many charities that are struggling to help women receive abortions because their donation funding is declining significantly.

a reply to: Dandandat3

Who could have seen the crisis coming? Who could have imagined that Trump and the Heritage Foundation would betray and harm women so severely? /sarc

I mean, in early 2022 women were protected from life threatening abortion bans. Then, as Trump promised, by summer his judges overturned Roe and revoked a civil right, causing Trump's signature, chaos, and Trump abortion bans in no less than 24 states today. Now, women are bleeding out in parking lots, dying in bathrooms, leaving their children motherless, because Trump traded American's girls' and women's safety for personal power, fame and money.

All while MAGA celebrates.

Until this injustice is rectified, sadly, charities are stepping up where the government has betrayed us.

Thank goodness Huffington Post is getting the word out, eh?

a reply to: Sookiechacha

If you read the article instead of just getting on your anti-maga soap box you would know that the funding issues pre-dates maga and the Fund's problems are far deeper than the current issues of certain states putting bans on abortion. If MAGA evaporated tomorrow the Funds would still have a short fall.

But don't worry you win the tribal argument on a dieing message board; you screamed the loudest and shook your fist with adequate vigger.

Still, plenty of women are not getting the help they need because to many people would rather argue on message boards than donate.

Yes, the Huffington post did an excellent job covering the story in order to help the cause. It's why I started this thread and linked their article.

I don’t think it’s particularly unusual to have a windfall as result of an event. And for it to subside over time (not exclusive to abortion funding).

It’s a good marketing tool.

Good article to draw supporters back in.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

THERE HAVE BEEN MORE ABORTIONS IN THE US SINCE ROE V WADE WAS REVERSED.

What part of this do you not get? HuffPo is still producing the lies to scare young women and not protect them. You see nothing wrong with trying to scare young women to have them produce a vote? It is sick.

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Sookiechacha

THERE HAVE BEEN MORE ABORTIONS IN THE US SINCE ROE V WADE WAS REVERSED.

What part of this do you not get? HuffPo is still producing the lies to scare young women and not protect them. You see nothing wrong with trying to scare young women to have them produce a vote? It is sick.

More or more reported?

What used to be a private matter between doctor and patient — has now become everyone’s business who can’t keep their nose out of what is not their business.