A woman met a group of migrants at a school bus stop. Then the story hit the internet

a reply to: BeyondKnowledge3

Ok then, explain how hiding a group of men in bushes to conceal that they are there and bringing them out all together is not aggressive in any way? Sounds like it could be considered that way to me.

I would say that hiding in the bushes with weapons ready to ambush passersby would be aggression. Hiding in the bushes as these folks did I would categorize as defense.

a reply to: NorthOS

And addressing those issues was not the focus of this thread, only this one issue that was blown out of proportion so as to fit in that over all narrative.

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

I actually edited my post right after posting it to say “very few anyways”. For the reason being…some do. But anyways……..

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
a reply to: BeyondKnowledge3

All I can suggest to you is to read back in that conversation where the poster states their opinion to which I replied, he had made it abundantly clear. That poster then replied that ''no one gets it'' and i replied that half the country did. I just grabbed a general percentage there and was not being factual.

I thank you for admitting to magically pulling numbers out of thin air. I gave you a star for that.

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

What part of "Illegal immigrant" don't you understand ?

These are not "Migrants or "newcomers" or whatever soft word the Democrats have for them this week. They entered this country illegally and are not entitled to US taxpayer money, but the Biden administration seems a hell of a lot more worried about taking care of them than they do the citizens who are in desperate need of help after the hurricane.

I have no problem at all with legal immigrants who bring something to this country, but the millions who have poured across are not acceptable. Spin it any way you want, they are a burden on American taxpayers.

originally posted by: KrustyKrab

originally posted by: Boomer1947

originally posted by: rickymouse
…..

There should be a mandatory requirement that anyone coming into this country to live must know how to speak English. Why should our school kids now be forced to take Spanish class?

There is.

Here are the requirements for an immigrant to become a naturalized citizen:

Age: Be at least 18 years old when you apply
Permanent residency: Have been a lawful permanent resident (Green Card holder) for at least five years
Physical presence: Have been physically present in the US for at least 30 months out of the 5 years
English proficiency: Be able to read, write, and speak basic English
Civics knowledge: Have a basic knowledge of US history and government
Moral character: Be a person of “good moral character”
Loyalty oath: Take a loyalty oath and support the Constitution and form of government of the United States

I guess you didn’t get the memo.

Almost all nations have the same or similar requirements to have some proficiency in the local language, if you are going to stay there permanently.

Also, no school kid is forced to take Spanish. Many school districts have a requirement to study a foreign language in high school, with the main options being Spanish, French, Russian, German, and Chinese. Having been born and raised in a former Spanish colony (California) I took Spanish and found it quite useful—especially when I started traveling to the larger Spanish-speaking world.

Again, most developed countries have similar requirements. It’s not uncommon for younger citizens of European countries to speak 2 or more languages besides their native one.

Yeah well first they have to meet the requirements for applying for asylum, which is how most are getting in, most of them are not here because of religious, political or racial persecution. They’re here for the money, you here this coming directly from there own mouths. That is not a legal grounds for obtaining asylum. Maybe you didn’t get the memo.

That’s the thing, they can just claim asylum then are able to legally remain in the US until there claim can be verified, which currently takes about 5 years because the systems so backed up.

Biden had a bill which would’ve made that process 6 months, taking away a lot of the motivation to falsely claim asylum, but Trump blocked it… you know, because he cares so much.

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

No links to the quotes????? WTF is with this? 🤣

Wheeewwwwwwww it's getting thick 😀

Star & Flag

a reply to: JadedGhost

Show us the exact language in that Bill that supports your wild claims. 😬

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: KrustyKrab

originally posted by: Boomer1947

originally posted by: rickymouse
…..

There should be a mandatory requirement that anyone coming into this country to live must know how to speak English. Why should our school kids now be forced to take Spanish class?

There is.

Here are the requirements for an immigrant to become a naturalized citizen:

Age: Be at least 18 years old when you apply
Permanent residency: Have been a lawful permanent resident (Green Card holder) for at least five years
Physical presence: Have been physically present in the US for at least 30 months out of the 5 years
English proficiency: Be able to read, write, and speak basic English
Civics knowledge: Have a basic knowledge of US history and government
Moral character: Be a person of “good moral character”
Loyalty oath: Take a loyalty oath and support the Constitution and form of government of the United States

I guess you didn’t get the memo.

Almost all nations have the same or similar requirements to have some proficiency in the local language, if you are going to stay there permanently.

Also, no school kid is forced to take Spanish. Many school districts have a requirement to study a foreign language in high school, with the main options being Spanish, French, Russian, German, and Chinese. Having been born and raised in a former Spanish colony (California) I took Spanish and found it quite useful—especially when I started traveling to the larger Spanish-speaking world.

Again, most developed countries have similar requirements. It’s not uncommon for younger citizens of European countries to speak 2 or more languages besides their native one.

Yeah well first they have to meet the requirements for applying for asylum, which is how most are getting in, most of them are not here because of religious, political or racial persecution. They’re here for the money, you here this coming directly from there own mouths. That is not a legal grounds for obtaining asylum. Maybe you didn’t get the memo.

That’s the thing, they can just claim asylum then are able to legally remain in the US until there claim can be verified, which currently takes about 5 years because the systems so backed up.

Biden had a bill which would’ve made that process 6 months, taking away a lot of the motivation to falsely claim asylum, but Trump blocked it… you know, because he cares so much.

Do you mean that joke of a bill that would require lots of border crossings per day before they thought about stopping anyone?

The limit for illeagle crossings per day before stopping them should be none. No illeagle crossings.
They should have worked through proper channels in their country and our government to arrange for asylum and migration.

Don't want to play by the rules? Then go home. It is that simple.

CLOSED PENDING SOURCES FOR THE QUOTES ON PAGE ONE
reopened......

a reply to: KrustyKrab

a reply to: BeyondKnowledge3

originally posted by: JadedGhost

Biden had a bill which would’ve made that process 6 months, taking away a lot of the motivation to falsely claim asylum, but Trump blocked it… you know, because he cares so much.

What???? I had no idea Trump is part of the house and the senate, and he is in charge of allowing bills to pass.

Do you really know what you are talking about? I guess not.

But I can tell you what biden and kamala did, the reverse all the border policies allowing the nation to be invaded, by no only illegals but drug cartels, child sex traffickers and terrorist.

Yep that is not a lie, I can post every single report in here if you want.

Biden signs 3 executive orders reversing Trump on immigration

nypost.com...

a reply to: DontTreadOnMe

Thank you for the addition of the link to the first post of that three part post that was included on the original third post.

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

Needs to be in the OP.

a reply to: JadedGhost

How about just don't let them into the country until their status is verified ?

Nah. Who am I kidding ? That's make much more sense and the Democrats wouldn't be able to use it to score political points, right ?

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: KrustyKrab

originally posted by: Boomer1947

originally posted by: rickymouse
…..

There should be a mandatory requirement that anyone coming into this country to live must know how to speak English. Why should our school kids now be forced to take Spanish class?

There is.

Here are the requirements for an immigrant to become a naturalized citizen:

Age: Be at least 18 years old when you apply
Permanent residency: Have been a lawful permanent resident (Green Card holder) for at least five years
Physical presence: Have been physically present in the US for at least 30 months out of the 5 years
English proficiency: Be able to read, write, and speak basic English
Civics knowledge: Have a basic knowledge of US history and government
Moral character: Be a person of “good moral character”
Loyalty oath: Take a loyalty oath and support the Constitution and form of government of the United States

I guess you didn’t get the memo.

Almost all nations have the same or similar requirements to have some proficiency in the local language, if you are going to stay there permanently.

Also, no school kid is forced to take Spanish. Many school districts have a requirement to study a foreign language in high school, with the main options being Spanish, French, Russian, German, and Chinese. Having been born and raised in a former Spanish colony (California) I took Spanish and found it quite useful—especially when I started traveling to the larger Spanish-speaking world.

Again, most developed countries have similar requirements. It’s not uncommon for younger citizens of European countries to speak 2 or more languages besides their native one.

Yeah well first they have to meet the requirements for applying for asylum, which is how most are getting in, most of them are not here because of religious, political or racial persecution. They’re here for the money, you here this coming directly from there own mouths. That is not a legal grounds for obtaining asylum. Maybe you didn’t get the memo.

That’s the thing, they can just claim asylum then are able to legally remain in the US until there claim can be verified, which currently takes about 5 years because the systems so backed up.

Biden had a bill which would’ve made that process 6 months, taking away a lot of the motivation to falsely claim asylum, but Trump blocked it… you know, because he cares so much.

No they can’t just claim asylum. First off they’re supposed to claim asylum in the first country the enter upon exiting their’s. Secondly to claim asylum legally you have to do it at a port of entry otherwise you’re illegally in the country. By law you can’t stroll into the country and apply for asylum. We just have a corrupt administration that doesn’t care about immigration laws so they ignore them.

Lastly the bill was killed by Schumer Not Trump, Schumer wouldn’t bring it back up for vote because he knew it wouldn’t pass because it’s a horribly written bill. You need to put your pipe down if you think 140k illegals per month has any resemblance of border reform. It’s unsustainable, the bill was garbage and did nothing to fix the problem. That’s most likely why Trump was against it not to mention he wasn’t even in office to stop the bill anyways.

When you don’t do the research and you don’t pay attention to what’s really happening besides what your left wing propaganda sources tell you, you really embarrass yourself when you try and speak on the subject. You’ve a bad habit of doing this.

a reply to: KrustyKrab

First off they’re supposed to claim asylum in the first country the enter upon exiting their’s.

If you're thinking Mexico can, and is willing to, take all these refugees/asylum seekers, you'd be wrong.

For many, the country is not at all safe. Mexico falls far short of meeting the legal requirements that would permit U.S. officials to treat it as a “safe third country” for the purpose of turning back asylum seekers.

humanrightsfirst.org...#:

Secondly to claim asylum legally you have to do it at a port of entry otherwise you’re illegally in the country. By law you can’t stroll into the country and apply for asylum.

Again, not the way the law currently works.

(a)Authority to apply for asylum
(1)In general
Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title.

www.law.cornell.edu...

a reply to: DontTreadOnMe

In all my years, I have never made more than a one part OP so I had no idea as I just considered the entire thing the OP. But now I know.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: KrustyKrab

First off they’re supposed to claim asylum in the first country the enter upon exiting their’s.

If you're thinking Mexico can, and is willing to, take all these refugees/asylum seekers, you'd be wrong.

For many, the country is not at all safe. Mexico falls far short of meeting the legal requirements that would permit U.S. officials to treat it as a “safe third country” for the purpose of turning back asylum seekers.

humanrightsfirst.org...#:

Secondly to claim asylum legally you have to do it at a port of entry otherwise you’re illegally in the country. By law you can’t stroll into the country and apply for asylum.

Again, not the way the law currently works.

(a)Authority to apply for asylum
(1)In general
Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title.

www.law.cornell.edu...

Who said anything abou Mexico? They’re coming from all over the world The only countries that “should” be eligible to apply for asylum in Mexico is Belize, Guatemala and the US. You don’t get to pass through 5, 10 or how many ever countries to apply for asylum in America. Although diplomatic asylum does works a little differently. And please don’t try and tell me every country in South America isn’t eligible to accept asylum seekers. Even if Mexico was a no go they still have other countries they should seek asylum in. FFS They’re coming from China, Pakistan, Egypt, Turkey, Syria. You going to tell me there’s not another country they can stop in🙄

Unless the law has changed and I don’t think it has, I think you’re incorrect or Cornell is incorrect which wouldn’t surprise me. This is ex -ICE director explaining legal asylum to AOC. I’m pretty sure he knows what he’s talking about. He was involved with the border for years and years.