October surprise incoming?

Being President is a 24/7/365 job.


second line.

a reply to: RickinVa

Wait... so Clinton's office dalliance with his intern was part of his "official duty?" Ummm ok.

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: WeMustCare
Obama on Diddy Video.

truthsocial.com...@MattUsaf2016/113239587565793095

Fixed the link for ya

TRUTH SOCIAL

No wonder Obama is not out on the campaign trail for Harris. Between the Diddy video and the info Trump has, Obama's name will be synonymous with "traitor scoundrel" in a few months.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: RickinVa

Wait... so Clinton's office dalliance with his intern was part of his "official duty?" Ummm ok.

"Serve and protect" is part of the oath he took.

a reply to: WeMustCare

Yes true and using his campaign and random whackos to concoct an illegal scheme to stay in power is not part of that oath.

originally posted by: frogs453
Maybe it's actually the 165 page court filing from Smith. With details. Not surprisingly the link I've posted before about what happened at TCF in Detroit and Trump having his campaign call fake elector Meshawn Maddock to get the Patriots there, was actually because he wanted a full out riot. He was already informed that he was likely going to lose. Haven't made it through the whole filing.

You can download the full pdf here

The TRUMP PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY will have a corner filled with all of Jack Smith's & Bob Mueller's filings and a big flashing sign over the piles that says, "Criminalized DOJ Failed Coups!"

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: WeMustCare

Yes true and using his campaign and random whackos to concoct an illegal scheme to stay in power is not part of that oath.

In war, the rules are bent, ignored, or thrown out all-together. Trump/MAGA declared war on 2020 election Cheaters/Fraudsters.

a reply to: frogs453

I’ll be saying the same about Biden’s potus immunity, except his transgressions were when he was a civilian.

You shouldn’t get your hopes up.
It’s going to get nuked and sanctions will be the least of it.
Haven’t you been paying attention?
All this lawfare is bit by bit going away.

They have to prove intent and they cannot.
They can’t even question it, potus is immune.

a reply to: frogs453
A scheme has to be executed before anything becomes illegal. Funny I don't remember any of that happening. Seems like they were just bouncing around ideas.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: RickinVa

Wait... so Clinton's office dalliance with his intern was part of his "official duty?" Ummm ok.

That was for Hillary to determine wasn't it. Like she didn't know at the time? 🤣🤣

a reply to: xuenchen

Bill gave new meaning to the term, "underling" 🤣

a reply to: underpass61

Yep until the fake electors sent the fraudulently signed certificates of ascertainment to congress and the archivist. That's a bit more than just a "plan" right? Or did he just consider that a "concept of a plan"? Wonder when we will find out why Grassley stated he would be the one to preside on the 6th and not Pence days before the 6th.

a reply to: frogs453

These "fake electors" were operating under the direct instruction of Trump? Citations please.

a reply to: underpass61

Well starting on page 31. Which by the way this meeting with Michigan GOP flown out to the WH was tweeted about by fraudulent elector Meshawn Maddock and there are news reports which actually noted in Nov that his push to have alternate electors could be illegal. Trump invites Michigan GOP to WH anyway starting on page 31 of the pdf.

Three days before Michigan's Governor signed a certificate of ‘ascertainment appointing Biden's electors based on the popular vote, the defendant met with[JE] I IEEE Michigan GOP Senate Majority Leader and Speaker of the House, at the Oval Office. * The defendant initiated the meeting by asking RNC Chairwoman|EEE to reach out to and gauge his receptivity to a meeting." The defendant also asked [IEE co participate in the meeting, but [JIEEH told him that she had consulted with her attorney and that she could not be involved in a meeting with legislators because it could be perceived as lobbying '** After[JJGEEI] made the first contact, on November 18, the defendant reached out to[JE and[EEEEMN] to extend an invitation!

Despite failing to establish any valid fraud claims,[|SSH] followed up with[EHH and and attempted to pressure them to use the Michigan legislature to overturn the valid election results, On December4,[EGER sent message toJRE claiming that Georgia was poised to do so (based on[JESS and[SSE false advocacy there in the December 3 hearing) and askedJIE fo help: “Looks like Georgia may well hold some factual hearings and change the certification under Artll sec 1 12of the Constitution.

This was a lie. Previous pages in the pdf show Georgia declared there was no evidence of fraud and no changes or hearings planned.

The defendant's co-conspirators worked with his Campaign staff, and used his pre-election Campaign apparatus, to execute the fraudulent elector plan. ** The defendant communicated with EE5 and about the plan, and they in tum communicated with and EEE Ultimately, ‘and other Campaign staff and agents helped carry out

Now, the weird letters are the redactions of individual names and this is only a portion of what occurred in one state. There are more. If you really wanted to know, you would read the pdf. I can't quote 165 pages here.

a reply to: frogs453

Looks more like jibberish from old spy movies and shows 😁

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: Vermilion

🤣🤣 ahh the desperation to defend dear leader.

As Trump stated(noted in the filing) when told Pence's life was in danger..."So what."

And his meltdown today is screaming more "guilt" than "this will all go away."

Wait until Chutkin allows the release of the attachments to the filing. You might blow a gasket.

Was that a soundbite? or just hearsay?
No they are doing what Mueller did to hillary and this is payback by hillary.
Trump did not say anything like assault the capitol. he said peacefully and loudly protest. Protest is not rioting.
"fight like hell" was not to be taken literally either. it means politically do all they can. DEMOCRATS have said this as well and didnt mean anything like riot and get violent.
Also the crowd he so called incited was 15 mins away from the people at the capitol who started the trouble.

At the time he was still president at the time and opinions of a president are protected same as congress and senators while they are on the clock.
Smith dont got anything,and essentially is doing the same as before,just rewording it to cause trouble till election.
It be nice to see the SC call them both to chambers to explain how rewording is viable.

Candis has a new video out about the book Kamala made up. Some pictures of relatives in it are not relatives at all and some relatives have no pictures in that book.



Who exactly is this Kamala Harris person? I don't think she knows herself.

Candis had a pbone call with Kamala's uncle. It is better if you watch the video. It is too complicated for me to do it justice.

a reply to: BeyondKnowledge3

Kamala Harris is an obedient MK Ultra slave to her masters.
The same as every single person who lives in silicon valley.
And a great number of illegal immigrnts as well. Most of
of you, not only on this site, but the world over haven't got
a god damn clue WTF is really going on.

a reply to: BeyondKnowledge3

although that woman was speaking the truth about harris, after the auntie and uncle part i had to close that frickin video.
to me she is as irritating if not more that her subject, and that constant on and on droning vocie. i bet people doent get a wrd in edge wise when talking to candice

originally posted by: BernnieJGato
a reply to: BeyondKnowledge3

although that woman was speaking the truth about harris, after the auntie and uncle part i had to close that frickin video.
to me she is as irritating if not more that her subject, and that constant on and on droning vocie. i bet people doent get a wrd in edge wise when talking to candice

So you would rather listen to somebody more pleasing to your
personal preferences than someone telling the truth? Perfect
response. Welcome to idiocracy.