Taylor Swift endorses Kamala Harris after presidential debate

a reply to: frogs453

He seems to grasp there is a problem. More than I can say from Harris. Bidenomics is working! She owns that, all of it.

This is sooo Hunger Games mixed with Idiocracy, but without the games and without the brawndo. What a joke the Presidential debates have become.

a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

a reply to: interupt42

Well summarized.

Cheers

originally posted by: Boomer1947

originally posted by: TheMisguidedAngel
The thing is people will just follow whatever she says which is a shame because 99% of the big issues don't mean squat to her. She's a billionaire so grocery prices, jobs and the economy don't mean anything to her. She lives in a manion with lots of security and a big wall around it so everyday crime rates don't mean anything to her, she's always safe. She has armed body guards and police escorts if she has to move around in public anywhere so again crime rates don't mean anything to her.

The border being open and illegals and homeless don't mean anything to her because they will never be living in her neighborhood or being allowed anywhere near her house. The fentanyl problem doesn't mean anything to her because it won't be in her neighborhood that the needles and homeless will be laying around everywhere. She will never have to walk through a drug area and see the abuse and crime.

These rich celebrity endorsements are a joke because the issues that are facing the common American don't ever effect someone like Taylor Swift.

Everything you just wrote applies equally well to Trump.

EVERYTHING I wrote APPLIES to EVERY Presidential candidate IN EVERY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION in the modern history of elections, including Kamala, whether they be republican or Democrat, that's not the point, I'm talking about CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENTS!!!

Celebrity's are telling their followers who to vote for when the issues don't impact them one bit. I'm not talking about the candidates because the candidates are supposebly trying to fix the issues for normal Americans, the celebrities aren't fixing nothing.

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof

originally posted by: TheMisguidedAngel
The thing is people will just follow whatever she says which is a shame because 99% of the big issues don't mean squat to her. She's a billionaire so grocery prices, jobs and the economy don't mean anything to her. She lives in a manion with lots of security and a big wall around it so everyday crime rates don't mean anything to her, she's always safe. She has armed body guards and police escorts if she has to move around in public anywhere so again crime rates don't mean anything to her.

The border being open and illegals and homeless don't mean anything to her because they will never be living in her neighborhood or being allowed anywhere near her house. The fentanyl problem doesn't mean anything to her because it won't be in her neighborhood that the needles and homeless will be laying around everywhere. She will never have to walk through a drug area and see the abuse and crime.

These rich celebrity endorsements are a joke because the issues that are facing the common American don't ever effect someone like Taylor Swift.

With the risk of being ''that guy'', I gotta say that sounds exactly like how one can describe Donald Trump.

EVERYTHING I wrote APPLIES to EVERY Presidential candidate IN EVERY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION in the history of modern elections including Kamala, whether they be republican or Democrat, that's not the point, I'm talking about CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENTS!!!

Celebrity's are telling their followers who to vote for when the issues don't impact them one bit. I'm not talking about the candidates because the candidates are supposebly trying to fix the issues for normal Americans, the celebrities aren't fixing nothing

a reply to: TheMisguidedAngel

supposedly trying to fix the issues for normal Americans,

So your stance here is ''sing and shut up''? ''Dribble and shut up''? Celebrities come in all shapes and sizes. Anyone who excels in their field can become a celebrity. Doctors, professors, scientists, authors, it's a long list. Would you have them all give up their right of free speech? Or is it just in the case of a celebrity who is so celebrated that their free speech can be so loud and possibly sway so many voters that you object.

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

That would logical and smart. I guess that would be just too hard.

September 15, 2024

Taylor Swift endorsement of empty-suit Kamala is backfiring...

Source: www.breitbart.com...

Once again, she's just a singer who dates a football player. Right?

a reply to: WeMustCare

A survey of 1,120 voters means nothing?

a reply to: WeMustCare

ABC poll shows the same thing.

Even Taylor Swift shows little impact: Just 6% in the latest ABC News/Ipsos poll say the pop star singer-songwriter's endorsement of Harris makes them more likely to vote for her; 13%, instead, say it makes them less likely to support her, with 81% saying it makes no difference.

ABC

If you are affected by any political statement that a celebrity entertainer spits out, then you have allowed yourself to be manipulated. Pure and simple.

It is propaganda 101, yet most people react to it automatically.

Gee wiz! I think Trump is upset about Swift's endorsement!

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

Who said anything about celebrities giving up their rights? They legally can say whatever they want.
It's just that people who blindly follow them are stupid.

Just because someone sings and writes songs you like doesn't mean their opinion should matter.
In fact, there's plenty of reasons why their endorsement should have less weight than the average person.

Taylor cares more about making a ton of money than the welfare of her average fan. Why doesn't she sell her tickets on a sliding scale? She would still be a multi-millionaire. Yet, she supports a candidate who forces the poor to share their meager resources with illegals.

Taylor wants asthmatics to pay hundreds more for their medicine to help the environment while at the same time having a fleet of private jets.

Taylor wants open boarders but her housing are guarded by armed guards.

And before you write a response, both the left and the right are like this - the elite control things.

So no, people shouldn't automatically vote for someone just because they were red hats and have funny insults. They shouldn't automatically vote for their favorite song writer.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

That's a totally rational thing for the Republican candidate to be twittering or truthing on the backstretch of a campaign 4 days after the endorsement happened.

Gotta hand it to him. He can divide and conquer other cults of celebrity and use the rabidness of his own fanbase to make himself the most important thing in their fanbase too.

He's gonna further divide her fans now because she dared to oppose him, but he will say it is for being political as an influential celebrity. It will be her fault she loses revenue for endorsing his opponent, and all those horrible things she represents.

It's like, "You'll either let me use your unauthorized likeness, or you'll suffer the consequences." Define catch 22. Let him use your likeness and let people think you support him, or lose your Trumpiest fans clearing things up.

In all cases he will prove HIS cult of celebrity is supreme and more godlike.

a reply to: Daughter2v2

In Taylor Swift's defense she told all of her fans exactly who she is:

"Did you hear my covert narcissism I disguise as altruism. Like some kind of congressman? (Tale as old as time)" ~ Swift

At least she is honest.