It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Source: www.cnn.com...
With its immunity ruling on Monday, the Supreme Court granted former President Donald Trump’s wish of all but guaranteeing that his criminal trial for trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election will not go to trial before the 2024 election in November.
It also granted presidents in general, a definitive “absolute immunity” from prosecution for core official acts, and said presidents should be presumed immune for a much more expansive list of acts.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
He said to put Trump in a bullseye.
That could have been a manchurian trigger.
But honestly ... I don't think this guy knows what is going on.
And I doubt he's in charge of anything.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
He said to put Trump in a bullseye.
That could have been a manchurian trigger.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: WeMustCare
I won’t put it past the government. They’ve done some strange things to protect their interests.
But a dweeb with an AR and iron sights just seems out of place if you’re going to put the fix in with PD and SS.
Seems like a whole lot of risk and exposure with a very flawed plan.
I know it wasn’t a long shot, but I still feel like a bolty and scope would make a world of difference for a conspiracy with so much to lose and so much conviction.
originally posted by: Mantiss2021
a reply to: WeMustCare
Lest we forget, it was Trump who first claimed Presidential immunity, in fact, Absolute Presidential immunity for Any act committed while in office.
Biden never claimed, or sought through legislation, or the SCOTUS, that power.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
He said to put Trump in a bullseye.
That could have been a manchurian trigger.
But honestly ... I don't think this guy knows what is going on.
And I doubt he's in charge of anything.
originally posted by: Athetos
Biden can’t both be a potato and evil mastermind.
Biden is a potato, so who was pulling the potato’s strings.
a reply to: WeMustCare
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: WeMustCare
I won’t put it past the government. They’ve done some strange things to protect their interests.
But a dweeb with an AR and iron sights just seems out of place if you’re going to put the fix in with PD and SS.
Seems like a whole lot of risk and exposure with a very flawed plan.
I know it wasn’t a long shot, but I still feel like a bolty and scope would make a world of difference for a conspiracy with so much to lose and so much conviction.
OK, you are for only one shooter and believe the OS?
I am sure there was at least two assassins shooting and a pack of lies for the OS, IMHO.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Mantiss2021
a reply to: WeMustCare
Lest we forget, it was Trump who first claimed Presidential immunity, in fact, Absolute Presidential immunity for Any act committed while in office.
Biden never claimed, or sought through legislation, or the SCOTUS, that power.
I am curious, do people actually think that killing a political opponent would be an official act and not something subject to impeachment, removal, and public trial and jail? The system didn't change, the SCOTUS just acknowledged what the interpretation was. Nobody is king or above the law. Nobody.