a reply to:
Mahogani
And do you believe that if these things can be proven that they all exist in a vacuum of innocence? I have been pointing out since at least 2016 or
2015 when John Kirby openly threatened Russian cities with terrorism back then after they dared to save the government of Syria from a coordinated
attack by Israel, NATO, the Gulf Cooperation Council states, and Turkey as they openly allowed all the world's psychotics to cross the borders into
Syria from Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and even Jordan in an effort to install a friendly government that would run an energy pipeline Through Syria to
Israel for exports to Europe. And the terrorism and sabotage arrived too btw.
I am betting we are going to pretend all of that history not only never happened, but has no bearing on today's flashpoints. Israel directly supported
ISIS and shared the only peaceful border with the califate in all of its years of existence, despite its alleged goal being the destruction of the
Jewish state and liberation of Palestine. yea, cutting off the heads of Muslims, Yazidis, Assyrians and Coptics, Arab Christians and Zooroastrians and
basically every single Semite in the Middle Eats was a target for the Jew hating Islamic extremists, except the jews themselves, who received not even
a single rocket strike into the occupied lands. (save for a single errant round that came from the Golan heights, and they somehow swiftly were able
to be in contact with Israeli officials and not only apologize, but say it was an accident and would not likely happen again.)
I get it, it shows who the real enemy of humanity may be Israel and its action show itself to be the most Anti-semitic institution on Earth. So
knowing all that, which you have already known but will play pretend like it never happened, will probably cast doubt on any of that history.
So with John Kirby having threatened Russian cities ten years ago with terrorism, I am guessing you would still believe Russia has zero justification
for any counter measures or retaliatory measures? Especially after said terrorism arrived. We all saw the last days of ISIS being erased with multiple
cluster munitions and heavy shelling on that small camp in Syria where the black smoke was running thick over the women on the outside as they tried
to stay away from the shooting. I happen to think that was not ISIS being destroyed at all, but an ancient lineage of human bloodline that was being
erased.
That was the real goal of ISIS (mostly chemically zombified maniacs working for Western and Israeli intelligence), to eliminate said bloodlines while
pretending to be them. Now, ISIS has morphed into nothing more than a dog whistle for MIC activities around the world. Need a domestic insurgency
squashed in Pakistan? Call it ISIS. Had a shootout with a rival military power that cost you both heavy?? Call it an attack by ISIS. Did an enemy
intel cell just sabotage some production? We will call that ISIS, and anyone can use them now, not just the West. ISIS is now used in this way in
India, Pakistan, Turkey, Israel, the USA, Russia, Britain, France you name it. If they got a powerful military and they either clash together or use
it on a domestic rebellion they will call it ISIS.
What is happening globally today is directly related to what unfolded in MENA after 2011. When your global military empire tries to reach out and
control all of Earth, there will always be pushback. Anyone who cannot accept that today is a consequence of yesterday is not grounded in reality.
Yea I have been harping on about the Sabotage attacks from all sides being exactly that, sabotage by rival military powers. I have been saying it
since at least 2015. It is good to see folks are now accepting it as reality though. it means people are finally leaving lala land. Also, to try and
pin a British national's murder spree somehow on Russia, that is quite a straw to grasp.
It would have had to involve this kid's pyschological profile being known to agents, a friendly asset within the highest medical authority to be able
to retrieve and pass that information on to the right culprits, and then the recruitment of a loose young lady to boost his ego and confidence with
some friendly words and actions (she usually disappears in chemicals unfortunately) and then point him to a target. But stabbing three random children
has much less value for anyone as opposed to, assassinating a presidential candidate with regarding resource expenditure and time invested.
I am not saying that it is not possible that an intelligent agent, maybe even from Russia recruited this kid. But the math don't make sense. A bunch
of nobody kids the public will mourn for 72 hours and move on to feigned outrage over some non-issue after is not the kind of operation that makes any
mathematical sense. The kid is domestic not imported. These kind of people do not even register on a foreign intel's radar unless a friendly asset in
the medical community present them as a viable murder asset.
Sorry, the theory of Russians somehow being involved with getting this disturbed child to murder other children just seems more like a standard
disassociated western child, desensitized to violence and probably an extreme internet user (like double digit hours a day type). There is a likely
history of some form of violence directed toward the child, but by whom I cannot know without integrating myself into his life for a week and
observing how he reacts with everyone in his day. You can find an antagonist by how their facial expression changes. One would be surprised what they
can learn about
anyone by simply studying their face and body language as they interact with people.