Warning Graphic Images – Close-up of DJT’s wounded ear to debunk naysayers

I'm guessing I'm missing something.

Where is anyone arguing that there is a hole in his ear? (except the person arguing there isn't one, when I can't find where anyone said there was?)

My goodness.

A gouge.
A graze.
A slit.

NOT A HOLE!

Still got shot at. Still got grazed. Still damn lucky to be alive.

a reply to: Encia22

Phuck the naysayers. They're just angry, jealous of the beautiful Trump family, Trump success, and are about to be marginalized to nothingness.

a reply to: Justoneman
Looking at the image Kurokage posted he seems to have a couple of bumps where I think you are saying there is fleshy debris.

Could just be that blood running down gives that impression.

Either way, his campaign is on the record that it was just skin deep. The holes that some people have claimed to be able to see clearly were never there.

a reply to: chiefsmom

a reply to: MetalThunder

Amen.
I have a 10year old grandson that will argue that cats don't have claws, just to argue.

I see more and more of that on this site lately.

originally posted by: chiefsmom
I'm guessing I'm missing something.

Where is anyone arguing that there is a hole in his ear? (except the person arguing there isn't one, when I can't find where anyone said there was?)

www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

I had someone reply to me saying the hole was obvious but my mind was blocking it out.

Someone even made a fake video showing the little plug flying out of the ear.

originally posted by: pianopraze
Millimeters from dead.

All but for last second tilt of his head to look at screen he would not be here.

analyses: the shooter shot at a target of right full profile BUT target suddenly pivoted foot-body-head 90 degrees to be wounded facing the shooter...
i propose the shooter blinked as the bullet fired, and DJT waked away

amazing 1/2 second in modern era

a reply to: chiefsmom
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Absolutely, in fact, the whole point of my OP was to show clearly that there is a real wound that would have been almost impossible to fake in those few seconds that had elapsed.

But the clear wound that they marked contradicts the letter issued by the person who has been taking care of the wound daily.

I don't understand why people can't just accept that you can't clearly see the wound.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: chiefsmom
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Absolutely, in fact, the whole point of my OP was to show clearly that there is a real wound that would have been almost impossible to fake in those few seconds that had elapsed.

But the clear wound that they marked contradicts the letter issued by the person who has been taking care of the wound daily.

I don't understand why people can't just accept that you can't clearly see the wound.

Because we see it. Sorry. I see it. I have no reason to lie. I am just calling things as I see it. You are too, but I think we know your record speaks for itself. At least you have some working brain cells.

a reply to: daskakik

OMG
The first one is not even this thread!
Go argue in that one!!!!

Not seeing any claim to an actual hole in the second one either!

a reply to: chiefsmom
Neither of them are but people were saying they could see the hole. That isn't on me.

a reply to: chiefsmom
First link:

and even a slowmo video of the ear hole in real time.

Second link:

there have been other angles that show what looked to be a small hole near the top of his ear.

a reply to: Justoneman
His own campaign put out a letter saying it is just skin deep.

You might think you see a hole but the person who had been changing his bandage daily disagrees with you. Maybe take it up with them?

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: chiefsmom
I'm guessing I'm missing something.

Where is anyone arguing that there is a hole in his ear? (except the person arguing there isn't one, when I can't find where anyone said there was?)

www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

I had someone reply to me saying the hole was obvious but my mind was blocking it out.

Someone even made a fake video showing the little plug flying out of the ear.

So you are arguing with another poster from another thread that isn't even posting here ?

WOW

Bizzare
LoL

a reply to: MetalThunder

So it isn't just me? LOL

BTW, good to see you around!

originally posted by: MetalThunder
So you are arguing with another poster from another thread that isn't even posting here?

No, I gave a couple of examples of people claiming a hole was visible.

The OP here said they marked a pic where he thought the wound was.

The person tending to the wound described it somewhere else. Obviously it isn't as clear and obvious as some make it out to be.

Wray is a partisan idiot.

From left wing New York Times -

Trajectory Analysis Contradicts FBI Shrapnel Testimony

The New York Times reported Friday that its own analysis of bullet trajectory, video, audio and photo evidence "strongly suggests" that the gunman's first shot "grazed" Trump's ear.

In all, at least three of the shots came close to seriously injuring the former president, according to the paper's analysts.

So...have we established Trump had his own real blood on his head yet...or are idiots still arguing he staged it?

a reply to: FlyersFan

originally posted by: CarlLaFong
So...have we established Trump had his own real blood on his head yet...

Have you?

Maybe you should have gotten a sample to run DNA tests on it.