Physically Unfit, Under-Qualified Agents with a Diversity-Obsessed Boss Chosen by Dr Jill Biden

a reply to: SprocketUK

Me too!

I loved the one where she was saying in her job "you need eyes in the back of your head".

Whilst behind her the Outlaws were carrying a dead body.

a reply to: quintessentone

Perhaps they should re name them "Snowflake Agents"?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Doesn't say what the Physical Test entails.

originally posted by: quintessentone
Nobody here knows anything about what makes an SS agent qualified or not.

Our own eyes and common sense do. It's abject stupidity to ignore your own common sense and your own vision, and instead count on a corruptocrat to tell you their version of the truth.

originally posted by: quintessentone
Then someone provide the SS's training and qualifications sources to prove female agents can never qualify for the job.

Sure ... some women undoubtedly could qualify and be competent.
But the little girls protecting Trump on Saturday simply were not.
TOO SHORT.
And obviously didn't know what they were doing.

a reply to: chiefsmom

"Be in excellent health and physical condition and pass an Applicant Physical Abilities Test."

Yes, it doesn't say what the test is, but I would imagine it's fairly tough, but I don't know.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Then someone provide the SS's training and qualifications sources to prove female agents can never qualify for the job.

Sure ... some women undoubtedly could qualify and be competent.
But the little girls protecting Trump on Saturday simply were not.
TOO SHORT.
And obviously didn't know what they were doing.

And, again, the two tall guys flanking him did nothing to protect his head. Explain that.

For those failing to understand logic.

As Per Mr. Bongino, a former SS Agent.

Women can be SS agents. Not the issue at all.

The issue is, Agents should be matched to the subject in which they are guarding. If a man is 6"2, the agents need to be that tall, or taller. If the agent is Large, they need to be super strong.
They must be able to "build a wall" around the subject. And they need to know what they are doing!


This was impossible, with the agents guarding Trump. They should have never been on his PP duty.

They should have been on Jill & Kamala's duty.

Can we make it any easier? Do we need a diagram? Crayons?

a reply to: chiefsmom

Here you go:

www.secretservice.gov...

Height not mentioned.

originally posted by: chiefsmom
For those failing to understand logic.

As Per Mr. Bongino, a former SS Agent.

Women can be SS agents. Not the issue at all.

The issue is, Agents should be matched to the subject in which they are guarding. If a man is 6"2, the agents need to be that tall, or taller. If the agent is Large, they need to be super strong.
They must be able to "build a wall" around the subject.

This was impossible, with the agents guarding Trump. They should have never been on his PP duty.

They should have been on Jill & Kamala's duty.

Can we make it any easier? Do we need a diagram? Crayons?

Do you have the SS's strategic planning manual that we can peruse?

a reply to: quintessentone

Ever stop to think that was not their assignment? I'm sure you didn't

Or the fact that Trump intentionally stood back up to show his supporters that he was okay, pushing his SS agents out of the way a little to do so, might have something to do with it

a reply to: quintessentone

Nope!
Dan Bongino

Ask him. I bet he could answer your questions.

I'm sure he would love to listen to your arguments.

originally posted by: chiefsmom
a reply to: quintessentone

Nope!
Dan Bongino

Ask him. I bet he could answer your questions.

I'm sure he would love to listen to your arguments.

I just read the SS's assessment of that female agent's actions and she did not do anything outside of her training.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Ever stop to think that was not their assignment? I'm sure you didn't

Or the fact that Trump intentionally stood back up to show his supporters that he was okay, pushing his SS agents out of the way a little to do so, might have something to do with it

Might have, could have, should have...are not facts.

a reply to: quintessentone

Neither are your assertions of wrongdoing on anyone else in the SS

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Then someone provide the SS's training and qualifications sources to prove female agents can never qualify for the job.

Sure ... some women undoubtedly could qualify and be competent.
But the little girls protecting Trump on Saturday simply were not.
TOO SHORT.
And obviously didn't know what they were doing.

And, again, the two tall guys flanking him did nothing to protect his head. Explain that.

OK, trump is a 3 dimensional entity. He has a front, two sides, and a back. At the second the shot pierced his ear, none of the agents on the ground knew where the shooter was, or what direction he was shooting from. Hell, they didn't even know it was a man shooting. Could have been some nutter old lady with TDS and mush for brains.

But their job is to surround him and be human shields for him, or whomever was their charge. The tall man were part of the surrounding agents, and it appears they did the surrounding him part right. The only problem was, with Trump over 6 ft tall, and the little girl with the bun, was not much over 5 ft. Not sure how your math skills are, but if you do that cyphering, you might realize even if she has high heels, she wasn't going to be able to protect his melon, from any angle. I am sure she is a wonderful person, as Eric has said, (and I'm glad you are accepting the word of random Trump family as the gospel, it's important, and a good thing) but perhaps she would be better at covering someone shorter.

But I hope that explanation explained why the other tall men were able to protect Trump. I have doubts you will grasp it based on previous conversations, but I hold out hope you will grow some. And do better. And stop being silly.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Neither are your assertions of wrongdoing on anyone else in the SS

Wrongdoing? That will be determined on Monday's bipartisan committee hearing, not here on this site.

a reply to: quintessentone

You tried to shift blame from the female agent to the male agents, that is claiming wrongdoing on their part. You know exactly what you were intending when you said it.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

You tried to shift blame from the female agent to the male agents, that is claiming wrongdoing on their part. You know exactly what you were intending when you said it.

Did the male agents protect Trump's head or not?