Hunter Biden guilty on 3 charges

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

Much like Trump, Hunter's a first time offender and these are non-violent crimes. The odds of jail time for either of them are relatively low.

Yes, but as Hunter is now a convicted felon, when he is found guilty in the tax case, his sentence will be judged based on the fact that he is a felon. Enhanced time I think it's called.

I learned all this from the Trump trial as folks on your side schooled us all on how being a convicted felon can be a hinderence to your future. But Trump is in his 70's and likely going to win the presidency regardless of the charges. Hunter has quite a few more years to think about how being a convicted felon will effect his lifestyle.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

Much like Trump, Hunter's a first time offender and these are non-violent crimes. The odds of jail time for either of them are relatively low.

Yes, but as Hunter is now a convicted felon, when he is found guilty in the tax case, his sentence will be judged based on the fact that he is a felon. Enhanced time I think it's called.

I learned all this from the Trump trial as folks on your side schooled us all on how being a convicted felon can be a hinderence to your future. But Trump is in his 70's and likely going to win the presidency regardless of the charges. Hunter has quite a few more years to think about how being a convicted felon will effect his lifestyle.

a reply to: JinMI

Got a link for that? I can only find this:

 

ISSUE: 

SENATOR BRAD HOYLMAN

 

SD 27

 

ADULT SURVIVORS ACT

 

SEXUAL ASSAULT SURVIVORS

NEW YORK -- Today, the New York Senate passed the Adult Survivors Act (ASA) (S.66/A.648), sponsored by Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Brad Hoylman (Manhattan-D/WFP) and Assembly Member Linda B. Rosenthal (Manhattan-D/WFP). This legislation would create a one-year window for the revival of time-barred civil lawsuits based on sex crimes committed against individuals who were 18 years of age or older.

Senator Brad Hoylman said: “Adult survivors of serial sexual assaulters like Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein and former OB-GYN Robert Hadden have been shut out of our courthouses by inadequate statutes of limitations. That ends now. In 2019 we passed the Child Victims Act, which has helped more than 6,000 sexual assault survivors seek justice. The Adult Survivors Act extends that exact same opportunity to thousands more survivors, letting them hold their predators accountable in court. For far too long our justice system has failed survivors of sexual assault, the passage of the Adult Survivors act is a powerful step to fix that historic wrong. I’m grateful for Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins’ unflappable commitment to seek justice for survivors of sexual assault, and for the leadership and persistence of Assembly Member Linda Rosenthal and so many incredible survivor-advocates.”

NY Senate

x.com...

Rep. Tim Burchett
@RepTimBurchett
The courts just found Hunter Biden guilty on gun charges. Now Congress needs to condemn the intelligence community for lying to voters and covering up the story about Hunter's laptop to help his father win an election.

originally posted by: theatreboy
a reply to: JinMI

How long did they deliberate?

Bonus Question: How long before the pardon?

I think it will play out like this:

Hunter will now accept a plea deal for the September IRS trial. Daddy then pardons both of them and resigns. They ride off into the sunset and the dems put up a new candidate. That their voters did not have a say in.

I am leaning towards Kennedy.

Cant be Kennedy because the Democrats are owned by big Pharma lobbyist who are fighting to quiet RFK Jr.

a reply to: frogs453

Is that next for H.Biden? 😧

a reply to: putnam6

Would that be the laptop that the FBI testified in this case that they couldn't confirm whether or not it had been tampered with after it left Hunter's possession?

Get Hunter on gun charges then no one finds out about the human trafficking & other crimes. Looks like another win for the protected class.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: frogs453

Is that next for H.Biden? 😧

Wouldn't it be great if his neice decided to come forward about time spent with Hunter when she was only fifteen? Of course, the Biden family doesn't operate that way; incestual relations and perversion seem to be their norm. Children learn what they live, after all....and the lil' apple, Hunter, didn't fall far from the Biden tree.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: putnam6

Would that be the laptop that the FBI testified in this case that they couldn't confirm whether or not it had been tampered with after it left Hunter's possession?

The FBI just testified to the fact that the laptop was NOT tampered with.
Hunters own cloud confirmed that fact.

The FBI knew it was legit since December 2019 yet didn’t say a peep when the 51 traitorous intel jerks wrote that letter.

Hunters trial produced some amazing evidence.
Way better than the actual justice Hunter faces.

a reply to: Threadbarer

Go read the transcripts again, they said it was not tampered with. Under oath.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: putnam6

Would that be the laptop that the FBI testified in this case that they couldn't confirm whether or not it had been tampered with after it left Hunter's possession?

Sure if that makes you feel better...

originally posted by: theatreboy
a reply to: Threadbarer

Go read the transcripts again, they said it was not tampered with. Under oath.

Thats what thought as well, looking for link or citation

a reply to: JinMI

after this rulling do you think it would be wise to go the way of bar tenders? Kinda like how if a patron is too intoxicated the bar tender can be held liable. So does it not stand to reason that a law should be in place to help protect the gun seller. Maybe say a mandatory substance test for any and all before the purchase? That is probably what will happen.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: VariedcodeSole

He should appeal it. Seriously.

I agree!
While I personally am glad that a crack addict can't legally possess a gun, the law itself it too easily abused. No one regisltered to legally purchse marajuana in California can't legally possess a firearm, for example.

Plus, I believe the lower courts have ruled that the actual form, that Hunter lied on, violates the 5th Amendment of a person's right not to incriminate oneself. That case is rambling thorugh the court system, somewhere.

SERIOUSLY??? Jeezus!

But, to your point, if there was a prosecutorial or legal proceeding error, then he should appeal it. After all, it's his right. That said your points on why are beyond ABSURD, in my not so humble opinion.

a reply to: putnam6

There was a recent thread about this...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: budzprime69
a reply to: JinMI

after this rulling do you think it would be wise to go the way of bar tenders? Kinda like how if a patron is too intoxicated the bar tender can be held liable. So does it not stand to reason that a law should be in place to help protect the gun seller. Maybe say a mandatory substance test for any and all before the purchase? That is probably what will happen.

What part of "Shall not be infringed." do people not get?

While I agree that the question should not be there, it was made law. And the courts let it stand.

But let's not add more laws just bc lefties are sad their favorite addict just got convicted.

originally posted by: Encia22
a reply to: putnam6

There was a recent thread about this...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Thank you sir, I haven't been here in a while...

originally posted by: Vermilion

originally posted by: xuenchen
Any comments from Jill and James?? Jill was there trying hard to intimidate 🤣🤣🤣

The good doctor wasn’t there for the verdict, nor any of his other family.
Only the gold digging wife.
Go figure.

Jill was there, but not in the room at the time the verdict was announced.

I'm sure she had very specific instructions NOT to be in the courtroom when the verdict was read. That way, there could never be a picture, sketch or image of the First Lady as the verdict was announced.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: putnam6

Would that be the laptop that the FBI testified in this case that they couldn't confirm whether or not it had been tampered with after it left Hunter's possession?

Wow, the degree that you go to in order to defend these corrupt clowns is astonishing. It’s like some sick and twisted version of the Stockholm Syndrome.

Hunter is a immoral lying corrupt alcoholic tax dodging crack head who was banging his brother’s widow and selling his daddy around the globe. He’s been connected to prostitution and sex trafficking which I think anyone with half a brain knows is most likely true. It doesn’t stop there, there’s a long list of deranged crap he’s done. Yet, you defend him and the bidens no matter what they do. Doesn’t sound very healthy or sane to me but you do you Xcal. Nothing to see here, as usual, right?